Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper synthesizes a wide range of knowledge on the role of sex/gender in Learning and Development (L&D) and applies Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model to propose a research agenda for advancing women’s equity in L&D. The paper highlights how the learning and development of women are historically, culturally and socially constrained by gendered environments, norms, expectations, opportunities, and barriers. The analysis is based on a systematic-narrative hybrid literature review of a wide range of research and contributions on sex/gender in L&D. The paper argues L&D is part of a system that perpetuates inequities for women. The paper proposes a future research focus on the impact of women’s embodied transitions, the role of sex/gender in situated L&D proximal processes and outcomes, intersectionality and diversity within the category women and supporting women’s agency in L&D research and practice. The proposed research agenda is envisioned as a collaborative undertaking between scholars and practitioners.

Keywords

equity for women sex/gender learning and development Bronfenbrenner bioecological model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadi

Dirani

K. M.

Rezaei

F. D.

(2022). Women in leadership: A systematic literature review of Middle Eastern women managers’ careers from NHRD and institutional theory perspectives. Human Resource Development International, 25(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1840847

Abalkhail

J. M.

(2019). Women’s career development in an Arab Middle Eastern context. Human Resource Development International, 22(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1499377

Acilar

Sæbø

Ø.

(2023). Towards understanding the gender digital divide: A systematic literature review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 72(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2021-0147

Acker

(2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499

Acker

(2009). From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du Travail, 51(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2009.03.004

Aisa

Gonzalez-Alvarez

M. A.

Larramona

(2016). The role of gender in further training for Spanish workers: Are employers making a difference? Feminist Economics, 22(3), 154–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1101520

Alagaraja

Wilson

Alagaraja

McLean

(2016). The confluence of individual autonomy and collective identity in India: A narrative ethnography using an Indian–U.S. sociocultural lens. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422315615090

Allied Market Research . (2024). Corporate training market research, 2035. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/corporate-training-market-A06445

Athan

(2016). Matrescence. https://www.matrescence.com/

10.

Belenky

M. F.

Clinchy

B. M. V.

Goldberger

N. R.

Tarule

J. M.

(1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books.

11.

Bendl

(2008). Gender subtexts - reproduction of exclusion in organizational discourse. British Journal of Management, 19(s1), S50–S64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00571.x

12.

Benschop

van den Brink

M. C. L.

(2014). Power and resistance in gender equality strategies. Comparing quotas and small wins. In Kumra

Simpson

Burke

R. J.

(Eds), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 332–352). Oxford University Press.

13.

Bhowmick

(2025). Career or child: Is the neoliberal working women’s fertility on thin ice? Human Resource Development International, 28(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2388918

14.

Bierema

L. L.

(2020). Ladies and gentlemen, your implicit bias is showing: Gender hegemony and its impact on HRD research and practice. Human Resource Development International, 23(5), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1809254

15.

Bierema

L. L.

Callahan

J. L.

Elliott

C. J.

Greer

T. W.

Collins

J. C.

(2024). Human resource development: Critical perspectives and practices. Routledge.

16.

Bierema

L. L.

Cseh

(2003). Evaluating AHRD research using a feminist research framework. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1047

17.

Boll

Bublitz

(2018). A cross-country comparison of gender differences in job-related training: The role of working hours and the household context. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(3), 503–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12299

18.

Boxenbaum

Rouleau

(2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330898

19.

Brewis

Beck

Davies

Matheson

(2017). The effects of menopause transition on women’s economic participation in the UK. Department for Education.

20.

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

21.

Bronfenbrenner

(1988). Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: Present and future. In Bolger

Caspi

Downey

Moorehouse

(Eds.), Persons in contexts: Developmental processes (pp. 25–49). Cambridge University Press.

22.

Bronfenbrenner

(1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In Moen

Elder

G. H.

Luscher

(Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). American Psychological Association.

23.

Bronfenbrenner

(1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In Friedman

S. L.

Wachs

T. D.

(Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (pp. 3–28). American Psychological Association.

24.

Bronfenbrenner

Ceci

S. J.

(1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568

25.

Bronfenbrenner

Evans

G. W.

(2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging theoretical models, research designs, and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114

26.

Bronfenbrenner

Morris

P. A.

(2006). The bioecological model of human development. In Damon

Lerner

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). Wiley.

27.

Brooks

A. K.

Edwards

(2009). Allies in the workplace: Including LGBT in HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308328500

28.

Butler

(2006). Gender trouble; feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge Classics.

29.

Byrd

(2023). HRD practice: Who is doing the work? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 25(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223221140162

30.

Calás

M. B.

Smircich

Holvino

Kumra

Burke

R. J.

Simpson

(2014). Theorizing gender-and-organization: Changing times…changing theories? In The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.013.025

31.

Callahan

J. L.

Elliott

C. J.

(2020). Gender hegemony and its impact on HRD research and practice. Human Resource Development International, 23(5), 469–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1816606

32.

Cho

You

Choi

Kim

Y. H.

Kim

Kang

S. H.

Lee

Kim

(2023). Career chance events of highly educated women with doctoral degrees in South Korea. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(9), 921–945. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2022-0049

33.

CIPD (2023). Learning at work, 2023. Retrieved, November 5, 2025, from https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/2023-pdfs/2023-learning-at-work-survey-report-8378.pdf

34.

Clarke

(2011). Advancing women’s careers through leadership development programs. Employee Relations, 33(5), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451111153871

35.

Connell

R. W.

(2006). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities. In Skelton

Francis

Smulyan

(Eds.), The sage handbook of gender and education (pp. 18–30). Sage Publications.

36.

Cornwall

Gideon

Wilson

(2008). Introduction: Reclaiming feminism: Gender and neoliberalism. IDS Bulletin, 39(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2008.tb00505.x

37.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139.

38.

Dämmrich

Kosyakova

Blossfeld

H. P.

(2015). Gender and job-related non-formal training: A comparison of 20 countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56(6), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715215626769

39.

Darling

(2007). Ecological systems theory: The person in the center of the circles. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600701663023

40.

Debebe

Anderson

Bilimoria

Vinnicombe

S.M.

(2016). Women’s leadership development programs: Lessons learned and new frontiers. Journal of Management Education, 40(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916639079

41.

Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

42.

Dosunmu

A. G.

Adeyemo

K. S.

(2018). Lifelong learning, human capital development and the career advancement of women in the telecommunications industry in South Africa. Industry and Higher Education, 32(3), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218765501

43.

Doyle

Findlay

Young

J. D.

(2012). Workplace learning issues of hotel employees: Examining differences across management status and gender. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 11(4), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2012.690679

44.

Duckworth

(2013). Learning trajectories, violence and empowerment amongst adult basic skills learners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383537

45.

Due-Billing

Alvesson

(2014). Leadership. A matter of gender? In Kumra

Simpson

Burke

R. J.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 200–222). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.001.0001

46.

Ely

Padavic

(2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1121–1143. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585842

47.

Ely

R. J.

Ibarra

Kolb

D. M.

(2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914533088

48.

Ely

R. J.

Meyerson

D. E.

(2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 103–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2

49.

English

L. M.

Carlsen

(2019). Lifelong learning and the sustainable development goals (SDGs): Probing the implications and the effects. International Review of Education, 65(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09773-6

50.

European Institute for Gender Equality . (2020). Gender equality index 2020: Digitalisation and the future of work. https://eige.europa.eu/publications-resources/toolkits-guides/gender-equality-index-2020-report/gendered-patterns-use-new-technologies?language_content_entity=en

51.

Ferguson

K. E.

(2017). Feminist theory today. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111648

52.

Gallant

(2014). Symbolic interactions and the development of women leaders in higher education. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12030

53.

Gallos

J. V.

(2017). Republication of “Women’s experiences and ways of knowing: Implications for teaching and learning in the organizational behavior classroom”. Journal of Management Education, 41(5), 649–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917702904

54.

Garavan

(2023). Editorial: Mapping the next phase of growth for HRDR. Human Resource Development Review, 22(4), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231213205

55.

Garavan

Wang

Matthews-Smith

Nagarathnam

Lai

(2018). Advancing national human resource development research: Suggestions for multilevel investigations. Human Resource Development International, 21(4), 288–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1429171

56.

Garavan

Wang

Nolan

Lai

O’Brien

Darcy

Matthews‐Smith

McLean

(2023). Putting the individual and context back into national human resource development research: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12308

57.

Gedro

(2009). LGBT career development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308328396

58.

Gedro

Hartman

L. P.

(2016). Education as a response to NHRD gaps in developing economies: a case study of l’Ecole de Choix/The School of Choice (Haiti), as critical national human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21220

59.

Gegenfurtner

(2020). Testing the gender similarities hypothesis: Differences in subjective task value and motivation to transfer training. Human Resource Development International, 23(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1449547

60.

Germain

M.-L.

Herzog

M. J. R.

Hamilton

P. R.

(2012). Women employed in male-dominated industries: Lessons learned from female aircraft pilots, pilots-in-training and mixed-gender flight instructors. Human Resource Development International, 15(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2012.707528

61.

Gouthro

P. A.

(2009). Neoliberalism, lifelong learning, and the homeplace: Problematizing the boundaries of ‘public’ and ‘private’ to explore women’s learning experiences. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927733

62.

Greenhalgh

Thorne

Malterud

(2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931

63.

Greig

(2019). Factors affecting modern apprenticeship completion in Scotland. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12142

64.

Hoobler

J. M.

Lemmon

Wayne

S. J.

(2014). Women’s managerial aspirations: An organizational development perspective. Journal of Management, 40(3), 703–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311426911

65.

Horsley

(2019). Tips for improving the writing and reporting quality of systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 39(1), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000241

66.

Howell

S. L.

Carter

V. K.

Schied

F. M.

(2002). Gender and women’s experience at work: A critical and feminist perspective on human resource development. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713602052002003

67.

Hyde

J. S.

Bigler

R. B.

Joel

Tate

C. C.

van Anders

S. M.

(2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307

68.

INSEAD . (n.d.). Women leaders programme. https://www.insead.edu/executive-education/leadership/women-leaders-programme?_ref=finder

69.

Johansson

Abrahamsson

(2018). Gender-equal organizations as a prerequisite for workplace learning. The Learning Organization, 25(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2017-0050

70.

Kairys

M. R.

(2018). The influence of gender on leadership in education management. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2017-0094

71.

Kaul

(2021). The misogyny of authoritarians in contemporary democracies. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1619–1645. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab028

72.

Kroese

I. C.

(2022). Is employee training really gender-neutral? Introducing a sex/gender-sensitive model of training. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100890

73.

Kroese

I. C.

(2023a). Sex/gender‐blind training maintains and creates inequity. Gender, Work and Organization, 30(3), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12947

74.

Kroese

I. C.

(2023b). Implications for practice: How to write a meaningful contribution. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 25(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223231176058

75.

Kroese

I. C.

(2025). Sex/gender inequity in management learning equals violence towards women. Management Learning, 56(3), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076241260957

76.

Lapidus

Kazakov

(2017). A methodological basis for assessing the cost-effectiveness of corporate training. Problems of Economic Transition, 59(7–9), 600–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2017.1394754

77.

Lewis

(2014). Feminism, post-feminism and emerging femininities in entrepreneurship. In Kumra

Simpson

Burke

R. J.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 107–129). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.001.0001

78.

Lorde

(2017). Your silence will not protect you. Essays and poems. London, UK: Silver Press.

79.

Lowik

A. J.

(2021). “Just because I don’t bleed, doesn’t mean I don’t go through it”: Expanding knowledge on trans and non-binary menstruators. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1-2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2020.1819507

80.

Matsuda

M. J.

(1991). Beside my sister, facing the enemy: Legal theory out of coalition. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229035

81.

Mavin

Grandy

(2012). Doing gender well and differently in management. Gender in Management: International Journal, 27(4), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411211244768

82.

Mavin

Yusupova

(2021). Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production. Management Learning, 52(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620950176

83.

McFadden

(2015). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender careers and human resource development: A systematic literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314549456

84.

McGrath

Ramsarup

Zeelen

Wedekind

Allais

Lotz-Sisitka

Monk

Openjuru

Russon

J. A.

(2020). Vocational education and training for African development: A literature review. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 72(4), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1679969

85.

McKinsey (2024). Women in the workplace 2024: The 10th-anniversary report. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace#/

86.

Melesk

(2021). Combining learning with family responsibilities: European women in comparative perspective. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 41(7/8), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2020-0194

87.

Merçon‐Vargas

E. A.

Lima

R. F. F.

Rosa

E. M.

Tudge

(2020). Processing proximal processes: What Bronfenbrenner meant, what he didn’t mean, and what he should have meant. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12373

88.

Metcalfe

B. D.

(2006). Exploring cultural dimensions of gender and management in the Middle East. Thunderbird International Business Review, 48(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20087

89.

Metcalfe

B. D.

(2007). Gender and human resource management in the Middle East. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601068292

90.

Metcalfe

B. D.

(2011). Women, empowerment and development in Arab Gulf States: A critical appraisal of governance, culture and national human resource development (HRD) frameworks. Human Resource Development International, 14(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.558310

91.

Metcalfe

B. D.

Makarem

Afiouni

(2021). Macro talent management theorizing: Transnational perspectives of the political economy of talent formation in the Arab Middle East. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(1), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1819858

92.

Metz

Kulik

C. T.

(2014). The rocky climb: Women’s advancement in management. In Kumra

Simpson

Burke

R. J.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 175–199). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.001.0001

93.

Nadeem

Abedin

Marjanovic

(2020). Gender bias in AI: A review of contributing factors and mitigating strategies. In: ACIS 2020 proceedings, 27. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2020/27

94.

Noffke

S. E.

Somekh

(2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021021

95.

Nusair

Palmer

(2023). Weak foundations in Arabic literacy: Drivers of learning poverty in Jordan. International Journal of Educational Development, 99, Article 102774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102774

96.

Orchard

E. R.

Rutherford

H. J. V.

Holmes

A. J.

Jamadar

S. D.

(2023). Matrescence: Lifetime impact of motherhood on cognition and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.002

97.

Orgad

Rottenberg

(2024). Mediating menopause: Feminism, neoliberalism, and biomedicalisation. Feminist Theory, 25(3), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001231182030

98.

Orser

B. J.

Elliott

C. J.

(2022). A conceptual model and assessment criteria to inform gender-smart entrepreneurship education and training plus. Gender in Management: International Journal, 37(3), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-12-2020-0378

99.

Pillay

Tones

Kelly

(2011). Gender patterns for aspirations for transitional employment and training and development in local government. Gender in Management: International Journal, 26(5), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411111154903

100.

Ray

Zarestky

(2022). Gender in vocational education and training: An integrative review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2019-0196

101.

Razvi

Roth

(2010). Non-governmental organizations and the socio-economic development of low-income women in India. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678861003589008

102.

Riddell

Ahlgren

Weedon

(2009). Equity and lifelong learning: Lessons from workplace learning in Scottish SMEs. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(6), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370903293252

103.

Rogers

(2012). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1–17. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1704&context=tqr.

104.

Róisín Reid

Kelestyn

(2022). Problem representations of employability in higher education: Using design thinking and critical analysis as tools for social justice in careers education. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 50(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2054943

105.

Rosa

E. M.

Tudge

(2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022

106.

Rottenberg

(2019). Women who work: The limits of the neoliberal feminist paradigm. Gender, Work and Organization, 26(8), 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12287

107.

Salminen-Karlsson

(2006). Situating gender in situated learning. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2005.05.005

108.

Sami

Mayai

Sheehy

Lightman

Boerma

Wild

Tappis

Ochan

Wanyama

Spiegel

(2020). Maternal and child health service delivery in conflict-affected settings: A case study example from Upper Nile and Unity states, South Sudan. Conflict and Health, 14(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-020-00272-2

109.

Sánchez-Moreno

López-Yáñez

Altopiedi

(2015). Leadership characteristics and training needs of women and men in charge of Spanish universities. Gender and Education, 27(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024618

110.

Santrić Milicevic

M. M.

Bjegovic-Mikanovic

V. M.

Terzic-Supić

Z. J.

Vasic

(2011). Competencies gap of management teams in primary health care. The European Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq010

111.

Schmidt

S. W.

Githens

R. P.

Rocco

T. S.

Kormanik

M. B.

(2012). Lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgendered people and human resource development: An examination of the literature in adult education and human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 11(3), 326–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312447193

112.

Selzer

Howton

Wallace

(2017). Rethinking women’s leadership development: Voices from the trenches. Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7020018

113.

Shank

(2016). What do you know: About men’s and women’s brains and learning. TD Insights. https://www.td.org/insights/what-do-you-know-about-mens-and-womens-brains-and-learning

114.

Sheerin

Hughes

Garavan

(2020). Gendered practices and tacit knowledge sharing in organizations: A structuration perspective. Human Resource Development International, 23(5), 542–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1769402

115.

Shepherd

D. A.

Suddaby

(2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647102

116.

Sim

Jeong

(2023). Mapping the future of intersectional research in human resource development: An integrated literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 22(4), 554–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231205066

117.

Sjöberg Forssberg

Parding

Vänje

(2020). Conditions for workplace learning: A gender divide? Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2020-0134

118.

Smit

Preston

L. D.

Hay

(2020). The development of education for learners with diverse learning needs in the South African context: A bio-ecological systems analysis. African Journal of Disability, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v9i0.670

119.

Sritanyarat

Sakdiyakorn

Chaudhuri

Cho

(2020). Vicarious learning from innovative women entrepreneurs in Thailand. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 22(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422320907049

120.

Streets

V. N.

Major

D. A.

(2014). Gender and careers. In Kumra

Simpson

Burke

R. J.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 293–313). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.001.0001

121.

Swan

Stead

Elliott

(2009). Feminist challenges and futures: Women, diversity and management learning. Management Learning, 40(4), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609336709

122.

Syed

Metcalfe

B. D.

(2017). Under Western eyes: A transnational and postcolonial perspective of gender and HRD. Human Resource Development International, 20(5), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1329367

123.

Tan

(2014). Human capital theory: A holistic criticism. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314532696

124.

The Sojourner Truth Project

(nd). Retrieved June 18, 2025, from. https://www.thesojournertruthproject.com/

125.

Thomsen

Hooley

Mariager-Anderson

(2022). Critical perspectives on agency and social justice in transitions and career development. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 50(4), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2106551

126.

Tornello

S. L.

(2020). Division of labor among transgender and gender non-binary parents: Association with individual, couple, and children's behavioral outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(15), 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00015

127.

Tuana

(2017). Feminist epistemology. In Kidd

Medina

Pohlhaus

(Eds.), The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 313–323). Routledge.

128.

Tudge

J. R. H.

Merçon-Vargas

E. A.

Liang

Payir

(2017). The importance of Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory for early childhood educators and early childhood education. In Cohen

Stupiansky

(Eds.), Theories of early childhood education: Developmental, behaviorist, and critical (pp. 45–57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641560

129.

Turnbull

Chugh

Luck

(2023). Systematic-narrative hybrid literature review: A strategy for integrating a concise methodology into a manuscript. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), Article 100381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100381

130.

Turnbull

(2002). Bricolage as an alternative approach to human resource development theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302011006

131.

United Nations Development Program . (2023). Innovation and technology enabling gender equality. https://www.undp.org/blog/innovation-and-technology-enabling-gender-equality

132.

United Nations Sustainable Development Group . (2020). Policy brief: The impact of COVID-19 on women. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-impact-covid-19-women

133.

United Nations Women . (2022). Press release: Achieving full gender equality is still centuries away, warns the United Nations in a new report. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/press-release/2022/09/press-release-achieving-full-gender-equality-is-still-centuries-away-warns-the-united-nations-in-a-new-report

134.

United Nations Women . (nd). Redistribute unpaid work. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/csw61/redistribute-unpaid-work

135.

University of Cambridge . (n.d.). Cambridge rising women leaders programme. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/executive-education/leadership/cambridge-rising-women-leaders-programme/

136.

Valls

Gibert

(2022). Editorial women in artificial intelligence. In Valls

Gibert

(Eds.), Women in artificial intelligence (AI) (pp. 1–8). MDPI.

137.

Van de Pas

Mans

Koutsoumpa

(2023). An exploratory review of investments by development actors in health workforce programmes and job creation. Human Resources for Health, 21(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00835-3

138.

Van de Ven

A. H.

Johnson

P. E.

(2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385

139.

Velada

Caetano

Bates

Holton

(2009). Learning transfer - Validation of the learning transfer system inventory in Portugal. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(7), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910985390

140.

Wang

(2019). Demystifying literature reviews: What I have learned from an expert? Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828857

141.

Wilson

(2015). Towards a radical re-appropriation: Gender, development and neoliberal feminism. Development and Change, 46(4), 803–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12176

142.

Windels

Mallia

K. L.

(2015). How being female impacts learning and career growth in advertising creative departments. Employee Relations, 37(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2014-0011

143.

Wotschack

(2019). Exploring the (missing) gender training gap in Germany: The role of organizations and sectors in continuing training participation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 26(3), 444–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy021

144.

Zoch

(2023). Participation in job-related training: Is there a parenthood training penalty? Work, Employment and Society, 37(1), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221128692

A Proposed Research Agenda to Advance Equity for Women in L&D

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References