Effective leadership has become a critical organizational challenge as remote and hybrid work modes become more prevalent. This systematic literature review examines 36 peer-reviewed articles that address leadership strategies for engaging employees in non-traditional work arrangements. Grounded in the job demands-resources model, self-determination theory, and social exchange theory, we examine the role of leaders as a major driver and mediator of job demands and resources. Our findings highlight that established leadership constructs, such as transformational and LMX, remain effective. In contrast, emerging approaches like e-leadership and family-supportive leadership have become increasingly relevant for guiding flexible work. The review reveals the importance of trust-building, digital competencies, and emotional intelligence in enhancing employee engagement. This review offers actionable insights for leaders and HRD professionals, providing strategies to navigate the challenges of remote and hybrid work. By tailoring leadership approaches to flexible work arrangements, this review contributes to the HRD discourse and sets an agenda for future research in this evolving field.
*AhujaJ.PuppalaH.SergioR. P.HoffmanE. P. (2023). E-leadership is un (usual): Multi-criteria analysis of critical success factors for the transition from leadership to e-leadership. Sustainability, 15(8), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086506
2.
AkkermansJ.SeibertS. E.MolS. T. (2018). Tales of the unexpected: Integrating career shocks in the contemporary careers literature. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 44(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1503
3.
*ArunprasadP.DeyC.JebliF.ManimuthuA.El HathatZ. (2022). Exploring the remote work challenges in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: Review and application model. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(10), 3333–3355. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2021-0421
4.
Babapour ChafiM.HultbergA.Bozic YamsN. (2021). Post-pandemic office work: Perceived challenges and opportunities for a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294
5.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
6.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
7.
BakkerA. B.TimsM.DerksD. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
8.
BasileK. A.BeauregardT. A. (2016). Strategies for successful telework: How effective employees manage work/home boundaries. Strategic HR Review, 15(3), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-03-2016-0024
9.
BieremaL. L. (2020). HRD research and practice after ‘the great COVID-19 pause’: The time is now for bold, critical, research. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1779912
10.
BoccoliG.SestinoA.GastaldiL.CorsoM. (2022). The impact of autonomy and temporal flexibility on individuals’ psychological wellbeing in remote settings. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 40(2), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.7433/s118.2022.15
11.
*BoccoliG.GastaldiL.CorsoM. (2024). Transformational leadership and work engagement in remote work settings: The moderating role of the supervisor’s digital communication skills. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(7), 1240–1257. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2023-0490
12.
BoellS. K.Cecez‐KecmanovicD.CampbellJ. (2016). Telework paradoxes and practices: The importance of the nature of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12063
ByrneZ.AlbertL.ManningS.DesirR. (2017). Relational models and engagement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-01-2016-0006
15.
Carasco-SaulM.KimW.KimT. (2015). Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314560406
16.
ChananaN.Sangeeta. (2021). Employee engagement practices during COVID‐19 lockdown. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2508
17.
ChoudharyN.JainS. (2024). A systematic literature review to explore the antecedents of employee engagement among remote workers. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 17(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-11-2023-0136
18.
Cooper-ThomasH. D.XuJ.SaksA. (2018). The differential value of resources in predicting employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(4/5), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2017-0449
19.
*CorderyJ. L.SooC. (2008). Overcoming impediments to virtual team effectiveness. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 18(5), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20119
20.
*CostantiniA.WeintraubJ. (2022). The benefits of being proactive while working remotely: Leveraging self-leadership and job crafting to achieve higher work engagement and task significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833776
21.
CrawfordJ. (2022). Working from home, telework, and psychological wellbeing? A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(19), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911874
22.
CropanzanoR.AnthonyE. L.DanielsS. R.HallA. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. The Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
23.
DasGuptaP. (2011). Literature review: E-leadership. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 1–36.
24.
DecuypereA.SchaufeliW. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 34(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219892197
25.
DecuypereA.SchaufeliW. (2021). Exploring the leadership–engagement nexus: A moderated meta-analysis and review of explaining mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168592
26.
*DeepaR.DharshiniJ. J. (2024). Driving sustained work engagement: Moderating role of leadership and organizational support for remote work. Management Research Review, 47(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-11-2022-0806
27.
DeRueD. S. (2011). Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31(2011), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.007
28.
*FawehinmiO.OjoA. O.Mohd YusoffY. (2023). Determinants of psychological empowerment and work engagement during COVID-19 pandemic. Kybernetes, 52(10), 4110–4129. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-08-2021-0690
29.
FerreiraA. I.MachM.MartinezL. F.MiragliaM. (2022). Sickness presenteeism in the aftermath of COVID-19: Is presenteeism remote-work behavior the new (Ab) normal?Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748053
FrankeF.FelfeJ.PundtA. (2014). The impact of health-oriented leadership on follower health: Development and test of a new instrument measuring health-promoting leadership. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 28(1-2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221402800108
32.
*GaanN.MalikS.DagarV. (2024). Cross-level effect of resonant leadership on remote engagement: A moderated mediation analysis in the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis. European Management Journal, 42(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.01.004
33.
*GalantiT.GuidettiG.MazzeiE.ZappalàS.ToscanoF. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
34.
*GerardsR.de GripA.BaudewijnsC. (2018). Do new ways of working increase work engagement?Personnel Review, 47(2), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
37.
*GüntherN.HauffS.GubernatorP. (2022). The joint role of HRM and leadership for teleworker well-being: An analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(3), 353–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022221083694
38.
HahmS. W. (2017). Communication strategies of online-based leadership and members' work engagement and job burnout. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 18(5), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2017.18.5.103
39.
*HajjamiO.CroccoO. S. (2024). Evolving approaches to employee engagement: Comparing antecedents in remote work and traditional workplaces. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(3/4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-10-2022-0103
40.
HanS. J.HazardN. (2022). Shared leadership in virtual teams at work: Practical strategies and research suggestions for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 21(3), 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221093376
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513
43.
HouseR. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90024-7
44.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
45.
KallebergA. L.MarsdenP. V. (2015). Transformation of the employment relationship. In: Emerging Trends in The Social and Behavioral Sciences. Wiley, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0364
46.
*KimM.BeehrT. A. (2020). The long reach of the leader: Can empowering leadership at work result in enriched home lives?Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000177
47.
*KlebeL.FelfeJ. (2023). What difference does it make? A laboratory experiment on the effectiveness of health-oriented leadership working on-site compared to the digital working context. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15798-2
48.
KorogluŞ.OzmenO. (2022). The mediating effect of work engagement on innovative work behavior and the role of psychological well-being in the job demands–resources (JD-R) model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-09-2020-0326
49.
LamprinouV. D. I.TasoulisK.KravaritiF. (2021). The impact of servant leadership and perceived organisational and supervisor support on job burnout and work–life balance in the era of teleworking and COVID-19. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-12-2020-0526
50.
LiP.SunJ. M.TarisT. W.XingL.PeetersM. C. (2021). Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101458
51.
MabasoC. M.ManuelN. (2024). Performance management practices in remote and hybrid work environments: An exploratory study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2202
*MaheshwariG.ClarkeS.NguyenQ. A. N.McClellandR.KunteM. (2024). Effect of E-leadership on employees’ outcomes in the higher education sector during COVID-19 and beyond: A case study from Vietnam. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231222715
MehradA.Fernández-CastroJ.de OlmedoM. P. G. G. (2020). A systematic review of leadership styles, work engagement and organizational support. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(4), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.735
56.
*MehtaS.SharmaS. K. (2022). Remote working during Covid-19 crisis: Impact of organizational support mechanisms on employee engagement and other work-related attitudes. NMIMS Management Review, 30(03), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.53908/NMMR.300211
57.
MigliorettiM.GragnanoA.MargherittiS.PiccoE. (2021). Not all telework is valuable. Revista de Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones, 37(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a6
58.
MunnZ.PetersM. D.SternC.TufanaruC.McArthurA.AromatarisE. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
59.
*MuthaP.SrivastavaM. (2021). Engaging virtual teams: Do leadership & trust matter?Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 732–747.
60.
*MuthaP.SrivastavaM. (2023). Decoding leadership to leverage employee engagement in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(3), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-07-2021-2856
NagoriR.LawtonN. R. (2025). The design of hybrid work for improved employee engagement and well-being: Perspectives for HRD practice. International Journal of Human Resource Development: Practice, Policy and Research, 8(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhrd-2024-0010
63.
NorthouseP. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
64.
OcB. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
65.
*Oleksa-MarewskaK.TokarJ. (2022). Facing the post-pandemic challenges: The role of leadership effectiveness in shaping the affective well-being of healthcare providers working in a hybrid work mode. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114388
66.
OlsonM. H. (1983). Remote office work: Changing work patterns in space and time. Communications of the ACM, 26(3), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1145/358061.358068
67.
PanneerselvamS.BalaramanK. (2022). Employee experience: The new employee value proposition. Strategic HR Review, 21(6), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-08-2022-0047
68.
*PanteliN.YalabikZ. Y.RaptiA. (2019). Fostering work engagement in geographically-dispersed and asynchronous virtual teams. Information Technology & People, 32(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2017-0133
PassS.RidgwayM. (2022). An informed discussion on the impact of COVID-19 and ‘enforced’ remote working on employee engagement. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2048605
71.
PerryS. J.RubinoC.HunterE. M. (2018). Stress in remote work: Two studies testing the demand-control-person model. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2018.1487402
72.
PopliS.RizviI. A. (2016). Drivers of employee engagement: The role of leadership style. Global Business Review, 17(4), 965–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916645701
73.
PopoviciV.PopoviciA. L. (2020). Remote work revolution: Current opportunities and challenges for organizations. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Econ. Sci. Ser, 20(1), 468–472.
74.
PurbaS. D.NilawatiL.NugrohoY. A. B.BudiantoE.GeatJ. L. K. (2024). Unlocking work autonomy: A hybrid approach for sustainable job satisfaction in the post-covid era. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 15(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v15i1.50277
75.
*RofcaninY.Las HerasM.BakkerA. B. (2017). Family supportive supervisor behaviors and organizational culture: Effects on work engagement and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000036
76.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In MagginoF. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229–6235). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630
77.
SaksA. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-06-2018-0034
78.
SaksA. M.GrumanJ. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement?Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21187
SchaufeliW. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 20(5), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025
81.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
82.
*ShiJ.FeenstraS.van VugtM. (2024). Connecting work teams in a remote workplace: An identity leadership perspective. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 33(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2362460
83.
*ShiB.HeY.LeeJ.HuangY. H.LiY. (2022). Safety climate profiles in remote workers: Association with key predictors and outcomes at the team level. Safety Science, 145(2022), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105477
84.
ShuckB. (2011). Integrative literature review: Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311410840
85.
ShuckB.HerdA. M. (2012). Employee engagement and leadership: Exploring the convergence of two frameworks and implications for leadership development in HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 11(2), 156–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312438211
86.
ShuckB.WollardK. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309353560
87.
SinghR.ChaudhuriS.SihagP.ShuckB. (2023). Unpacking generation Y’s engagement using employee experience as the lens: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 548–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.2170210
88.
SnyderH. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(2019), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
89.
SunL.BunchapattanasakdaC. (2019). Employee engagement: A literature review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v9i1.14167
90.
SunarsiD.RohaeniN.WulansariR.AndrianiJ.MuslimatA.RialmiZ.FahleviM. (2020). Effect of e-leadership style, organizational commitment and service quality towards Indonesian school performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(10), 472–481.
91.
*TakahashiK.YokoyaR.HiguchiT. (2023). Mediation of work engagement towards productive behaviour in remote work environments during pandemic: Testing the job demands and resources model in Japan. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(4), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2084848
UgargolJ. D.PatrickH. A. (2018). The relationship of workplace flexibility to employee engagement among information technology employees in India. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093718767469
94.
VarmaA.JaiswalA.PereiraV.KumarY. L. N. (2022). Leader-member exchange in the age of remote work. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047873
*VătămănescuE. M.DinuE.StratoneM. E.StăneiuR. M.VintilăF. (2022). Adding knowledge to virtual teams in the new normal: From leader-team communication towards the satisfaction with teamwork. Sustainability, 14(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116424
98.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WernsingT. S.PetersonS. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
99.
*WangH.XiaoY.WangH.ZhangH.ChenX. (2023). Who knows me understands my needs: The effect of home-based telework on work engagement. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 619–635. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s402159
100.
*WhitfordT.MossS. A. (2009). Transformational leadership in distributed work groups: The moderating role of follower regulatory focus and goal orientation. Communication Research, 36(6), 810–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346800
101.
XieJ. L.ElangovanA. R.HuJ.HrabluikC. (2019). Charting new terrain in work design: A study of hybrid work characteristics. Applied Psychology, 68(3), 479–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12169
102.
YadavM.VihariN. S. (2023). Employee experience: Construct clarification, conceptualization and validation of a new scale. FIIB Business Review, 12(3), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211012501
103.
*YangY. K.LinW. S. (2023). How to enhance workplace climate through telework communication approaches in organization during the era of changes? Evidences of authentic leaders. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.002
104.
YoonS. W. (2018). Innovative data analytic methods in human resource development: Recommendations for research design. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21331
105.
YoonS. W. (2021). Explosion of people analytics, machine learning, and human resource technologies: Implications and applications for research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21456
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
