Prosociality at work has attracted academic interest for decades. Particularly, the concept of prosocial impact— the subjective experience of making a positive difference for others through one’s work—calls for more research. Our systematic review of literature from 2018 to 2023 examined: (1) How has prosocial impact been defined in prior research? (2) Which theories underpin the research? (3) In what organizational contexts has prosocial impact been studied, and with what specific samples/populations?, and (4) How has the variable of prosocial impact been used in quantitative studies, mixed methods research, and as a concept in qualitative research? Thirty-six empirical articles met our inclusion criteria. The findings consolidate knowledge on prosocial impact and highlight its relevance in organizational studies, providing insights for both practitioners and researchers. Moreover, the review outlines a research agenda to further explore prosocial impact within human resource development, emphasizing its growing significance in understanding organizational behavior.
AfshanG.SahibzadaU. F.RaniH.MughalY. H.KundiG. M. (2022). Supervisors' knowledge hiding and knowledge-based trust: From the lens of social impact theory. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74(2), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2021-0165
BaileyC.YeomanR.MaddenA.ThompsonM.KerridgeG. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318804653
6.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
BankinsS.FormosaP. (2023). The ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7
9.
BashirM.WrightB. E.HassanS. (2022). The interactive influence of public service motivation, perceived reward equity, and prosocial impact on employee engagement: A panel study in Pakistan. Public Management Review, 25(7), 1213–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2013069
10.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
11.
BelléN.CantarelliP. (2019). Do ethical leadership, visibility, external regulation, and prosocial impact affect unethical behavior? Evidence from a laboratory and a field experiment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17721301
12.
BenaineS. L. (2020). Performance gaming: A systematic review of the literature in public administration and other disciplines with directions for future research. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(5), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0191
13.
BenteinK.GarciaA.GuerreroS.HerrbachO. (2017). How does social isolation in a context of dirty work increase emotional exhaustion and inhibit work engagement? A process model. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0227
BolinoM. C.GrantA. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
16.
BrinerR. B.DenyerD. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In RousseauD. M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 112–129). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
17.
CaldasM. P.OstermeierK.CooperD. (2021). When helping hurts: COVID-19 critical incident involvement and resource depletion in health care workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000850
ChalofskyN. (2007). The humane workplace: Aligning value-based organizational culture, meaningful work, and life balance. Organization development Network Conference.
20.
ChalofskyN. (2010). Meaningful workplaces: Reframing how and where We work. Jossey-Bass.
21.
ChenC.ZhangD. (2023). How innovation types affect users' continuous knowledge sharing intention: A self-determination perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2021-0386
22.
CohenD.PrusakL. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press.
23.
ConwayE.MonksK.FuN.AlfesK.BaileyK. (2020). Reimagining alienation within a relational framework: Evidence from the public sector in Ireland and the UK. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(21), 2673–2694. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1460859
24.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
25.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
28.
FreeneyY.FellenzM. R. (2013). Work engagement, job design and the role of the social context at work: Exploring antecedents from a relational perspective. Human Relations, 66(11), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713478245
29.
GablerC. B.LandersV. M.AgnihotriR.MorganT. R. (2023). Environmental orientation on the frontline: A boundary‐spanning perspective for supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 44(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12328
30.
GardnerW. L.KaramE. P.AlvessonM.EinolaK. (2021). Authentic leadership theory: The case for and against. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101495
31.
GarrardJ. (2020). Health sciences literature review made easy (6 ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
32.
GonçalvesC.ChambelM. J.CarvalhoV. S. (2020). Combating burnout by increasing job relational characteristics. Journal of Career Development, 47(5), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319837374
33.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
36.
GrantA. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108
37.
GrantA. M.CampbellE. M. (2007). Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X169553
38.
GrantA. M.ShandellM. S. (2022). Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060321-033406
HackettG.BetzN. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1
41.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
42.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Addison-Wesley.
43.
HammJ. A.RoppJ. W.WitwerA.ScottB. A. (2023). Self-efficacy, prosocial impact, and self-legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance. Public Administration Review, 84(4), 710–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13723
44.
HansenP. (2022). A replication of “the effects of making public service employees aware of their prosocial and societal impact”. Public Administration, 101(1), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12913
45.
HruskaB.BarduhnM. S. (2021). Dynamic psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with mental health in Emergency medical service (EMS) personnel. Journal of Affective Disorders, 282(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.130
46.
JohnsonM. A.PriesemuthM.BigelowB. (2021). Making sense of “good” and “bad”: A deonance and fairness approach to abusive supervision and prosocial impact. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3), 386–420. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.31
47.
KelemenT.MatthewsS.HenryS.ZhangY.BradleyB. (2023). Energizing and depleting? The daily effects of organizationally focused citizenship behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 38(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2022-0222
48.
KelliherC.RichardsonJ.BoiarintsevaG. (2019). All of work? All of life? Reconceptualising work‐life balance for the 21st century. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12215
49.
KimW.KimJ.WooH.ParkJ.JoJ.ParkS.-H.LimS. Y. (2017). The relationship between work engagement and organizational commitment: Proposing research agendas through a review of empirical literature. Human Resource Development Review, 16(4), 350–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317725967
50.
KipfelsbergerP.BruchH.HerhausenD. (2019). The impact of customer contact on collective human energy in firms. Group & Organization Management, 44(5), 915–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118783120
51.
KjeldsenA. M.Grønborg StennickeM.GregersenD. S.Lindgaard PetersenC.BagerA. V.JønssonT. F.AndersenL. B. (2023). Crisis intensity, leadership behavior, and employee outcomes in public organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(14), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2213856
52.
KrollA.VogelD. (2021). Why public employees manipulate performance data: Prosocial impact, job stress, and red tape. International Public Management Journal, 24(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1874579
53.
LanajK.FoulkT. A.ErezA. (2019). Energizing leaders via self-reflection: A within-person field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000350
54.
LanajK.GabrielA. S.ChawlaN. (2021). The self-sacrificial nature of leader identity: Understanding the costs and benefits at work and home. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000505
55.
LanajK.JenningsR. E. (2020). Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000450
56.
LeeH. W.BradburnJ.JohnsonR. E.LinS.-H.ChangC.-H. (2019). The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000346
57.
LiJ.GhoshR.NachmiasS. (2020). In a time of COVID-19 pandemic, stay healthy, connected, productive, and learning: Words from the editorial team of HRDI. Human Resource Development International, 23(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1752493
58.
LysovaE. I.AllanB. A.DikB. J.DuffyR. D.StegerM. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(2), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004
59.
ManganelliL.Thibault-LandryA.ForestJ.CarpentierJ. (2018). Self-determination theory can help you generate performance and well-being in the workplace: A review of the literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318757210
60.
MarczakE.YawsonR. M. (2021). Understanding the theories and interventions of motivation in organization development. In 58th Annual Conference of the Eastern Academy of management, virtual.
61.
MartelaF. (2023). The normative value of making a positive contribution – benefiting others as a core dimension of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(4), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05341-z
62.
MartelaF.RiekkiT. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
63.
MartelaF.RyanR. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 40(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9552-z
64.
MartelaF.RyanR. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well‐being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215
65.
MartelaF.RyanR. M. (2021). If giving money to the red cross increases well-being, does taking money from the red cross increase ill-being? Evidence from three experiments. Journal of Research in Personality, 93(2), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104114
66.
Martínez-CanoF.-J.LachmanR.CanetF. (2023). VR content and its prosocial impact: Predictors, moderators, and mediators of media effects. A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1203242
67.
McClurgN. O.EllingerA. D.McWhorterR.Osman-GaniA. (2024). Exploring individuals' workplace spirituality in the context of their work teams: A qualitative multi-case, multi-team study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 35(2), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21499
68.
MengL.LinX.DuJ.ZhangX.LuX. (2023). Autonomy support and prosocial impact facilitate meaningful work: A daily diary study. Motivation and Emotion, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10006-5
69.
MergelI.BelléN.NasiG. (2021). Prosocial motivation of private sector IT professionals joining government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(2), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19886058
70.
NiD.Jiwen SongL.ZhengX.ZhuJ.ZhangM.XuL. (2022). Extending a helping hand: How receiving gratitude makes a difference in employee performance during a crisis. Journal of business research, 149(2), 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.055
71.
OldhamG. R.HackmanJ. R. (1981). Relationships between organizational structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392600
72.
Opoku-DakwaA. (2022). Moral intensity, perceived impacts, and task motivation: Evidence from volunteers. Business & Society, 61(7), 1881–1918. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211053023
73.
OriolX.UnanueJ.UnanueW. (2022). The longitudinal link between compassion toward others and subjective well-being: The role of beneficence as an underlying psychological process to explain this relationship. Current Psychology, 42(29), 25218–25232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03490-4
74.
ParkM.YohT.ShonkD. J. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction among participants in health-affiliated charity sport events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 12(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-03-2020-0015
75.
RahmanM.TeranoH. J. R.RahmanN.SalamzadehA.RahamanS. (2023). ChatGPT and academic research: A review and recommendations based on practical examples. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v3i1.175
76.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
77.
SicilianoM. D.ThompsonJ. R. (2022). A field experiment on the impact of beneficiary contact on federal employee perceptions of prosocial impact and social worth. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1887985
78.
SilalahiD.FizF.Irwan AdiE.RianiR.PasaribuM. (2021). Ambidexterity, prosocial impact, and task performance in cross-functional teams: The role of individual’s team identification [Role of individual’s team identification]. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 8(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-12-2020-0237
StorbergJ. (2002). The evolution of capital theory: A critique of a theory of social capital and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 1(4), 468–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302238437
81.
TajfelH. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of Intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). Academic Press.
82.
TeeE. Y.binti Raja Reza ShahR. I. A. (2023). Self‐transcendent emotions and their influence on organizational effectiveness: A literature review and synthesis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12550
83.
TremmelS.SonnentagS.CasperA. (2019). How was work today? Interpersonal work experiences, work-related conversations during after-work hours, and daily affect. Work & Stress, 33(3), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1496158
84.
VogelD.WillemsJ. (2020). The effects of making public service employees aware of their prosocial and societal impact: A microintervention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz044
85.
YadaT.JäppinenA.-K. (2019). A systematic narrative review of prosociality in educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(6), 980–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218768579
86.
YadaT.RäikkönenE.Imai-MatsumuraK.ShimadaH.KoikeR.JäppinenA.-K. (2020). Prosociality as a mediator between teacher collaboration and turnover intention. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(3), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2018-0309
87.
YamK. C.FehrR.BurchT. C.ZhangY.GrayK. (2019). Would I really make a difference? Moral typecasting theory and its implications for helping ethical leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3940-0
ZhangH.ZhuJ.WeiL.ZhangW. (2021). A comparison between the psychological benefits of giving money vs. giving time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(6), 2677–2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00336-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
