Compared to the relatively well-trodden concepts of other workplace mistreatments, workplace backlash has received little attention from HRD academics. Therefore, our primary research objective is to identify how workplace backlash manifests and how it is addressed in the HRD and relevant literature. Through the analysis of 40 empirical studies on workplace backlash, we identified three types of backlash: backlash against gender equality, backlash against work-family balance, and backlash against racial justice. Additionally, we identified the consequences of each type of backlash and the coping strategies used by victims. Based on the findings, we discussed them from the recent conversations on diversity and inclusiveness in HRD from a social justice perspective and found ways to overcome workplace backlash. This study provides meaningful insights for HRD professionals and helps to advance diversity and inclusiveness research in HRD.
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the analysis.
2.
*AkinolaM.MartinA. E.PhillipsK. W. (2018). To delegate or not to delegate: Gender differences in affective associations and behavioral responses to delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1467–1491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0662
3.
*AlmerE. D.CohenJ. R.SingleL. E. (2004). Is it the kids or the schedule? The incremental effect of families and flexible scheduling on perceived career success. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:busi.0000043496.47644.38
4.
AlterK. J.ZürnM. (2020). Theorising backlash politics: Conclusion to a special issue on backlash politics in comparison.The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120947956
5.
AndersonC. (2016). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
6.
AnderssonL. M.PearsonC. M. (1999). “Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace.” The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/259136
7.
*BallakrishnenS.Fielding-SinghP.MagliozziD. (2019). Intentional invisibility: Professional women and the navigation of workplace constraints. Sociological Perspectives, 62(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121418782185
8.
BartlettJ. E.BartlettM. E. (2011). Workplace bullying: An integrative literature review. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311410651
9.
BergmanM. E.SalterP. (2013). Backlash! What it is, where it comes from, and how we can fix it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12082
*BironM.De ReuverR.TokerS. (2016). All employees are equal, but some are more equal than others: Dominance, agreeableness, and status inconsistency among men and women. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2015.1111338
12.
BironM.HanukaH. (2018). Non-cognitive antecedents of pay and pay expectations: Gender-based differences in a masculine work setting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2017.1400967
13.
*BlockC. J.GuptaA.LiA. (2022). Can a relationship buffer women leaders against the negative consequences of anger expression?Journal of Vocational Behavior. 133, 103665, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103665
14.
BohonosJ. W. (2019). Including critical whiteness studies in the critical human resource development family: A proposed theoretical framework. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(4), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713619858131
15.
*BosakJ.KulichC.RudmanL.KinahanM. (2018). Be an advocate for others, unless you are a man: Backlash against gender-atypical male job candidates. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000085
16.
BourkeJ.EspedidoA. (2020). The key to inclusive leadership. Harvard Business Review, 2–5.
17.
BrannonT.N.CarterE.R.Murdock‐PerrieraL.A.HigginbothamG.D. (2018). From backlash to inclusion for all: Instituting diversity efforts to maximize benefits across group lines. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12(1), 57–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12040
18.
*BrescollV. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994
19.
*BrescollV. L.OkimotoT. G.VialA. C. (2018). You've come a long Way…Maybe: How moral emotions trigger backlash against women leaders: Moral emotions in backlash, maybe: How moral emotions trigger backlash against women leaders. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12261
20.
*BrescollV. L.UhlmannE. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x
BurnesB. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306297004
24.
ByrdM. Y. (2014a). Re-conceptualizing and re-visioning diversity in the workforce: Toward a social justice paradigm. In ByrdM. Y.L ScottC. (Eds.), Diversity in the workforce: Current issues and emerging trends (pp. 334–346). Routledge.
25.
ByrdM. Y. (2014b). A social justice paradigm for HRD. In ChalofskyN. E.RoccoT. S.MorrisM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of human resource development (pp. 281–298). John Willey & Sons, Inc.
26.
ByrdM. Y. (2016). Selective incivility: A microaggression targeting racial and ethnic groups in the workplace. In KarstenM. F. (Ed.), Gender, race, and ethnicity in the workplace: Emerging issues and enduring questions (pp. 123–144). Praeger.
27.
ByrdM. Y. (2018a). Diversity branding strategy: Concealing implicit stereotypes and biased behaviors. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318778006
28.
ByrdM. Y. (2018b). Does HRD have a moral duty to respond to matters of social injustice?Human Resource Development International, 21(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1344419
29.
ByrdM. Y. (2022). Creating a culture of inclusion and belongingness in remote work environments that sustains meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047252
30.
ByrdM. Y.HughesC. (2014). A paradigm shift for diversity management: From promoting business opportunity to optimizing lived career work experiences. In HughesC. (Ed.), Impact of diversity on organization and career development (pp. 28–54). IGI Global.
31.
ByrdM.Y.MartinezJ.ScottC.L. (2014). Social class and diversity in the workforce. In ByrdM.Y.ScottC.L. (Eds.), Diversity in the workforce: Current issues and emerging trends (pp. 181–197). Routledge.
32.
ByrdM. Y.SparkmanT. E. (2022). Reconciling the business case and the social justice case for diversity: A model of human relations. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211072356
33.
CallahanJ. L. (2007). Gazing into the crystal ball: Critical HRD as a future of research in the field. Human Resource Development International, 10(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860601170344
34.
*CarlssonR.AgerströmJ.BjörklundF.CarlssonM.RoothD. (2014). Testing for backlash in hiring: A field experiment on agency, communion, and gender. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(4), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000126
35.
*ChaneyK. E.RudmanL. A.FetterolfJ. C.YoungD. M. (2019). Paying a price for domestic equality: Risk factors for backlash against nontraditional husbands. Gender Issues, 36(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-017-9207-8
36.
CheryanS.MarkusH.R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209
37.
*CiancettaL. M.RochS. G. (2021). Backlash in performance feedback: Deepening the understanding of the role of gender in performance appraisal. Human Resource Management, 60(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22059
CollinsJ. C. (2011). Strategy of career interventions for battered women. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311408691
40.
CollinsJ. C.ChlupD. T. (2014). Criticality in practice: The importance of social justice allies at work. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314544295,
41.
CollinsJ. C.ZhangP.SiscoS. (2021). Everyone is invited: Leveraging bystander intervention and ally development to cultivate social justice in the workplace. Human Resource Development Review. 20(4), 486, 511, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211040734
42.
CummingsT. G.WorleyC. G. (2015). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
43.
DenyerD.TranfieldD. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In BuchananD. A.BrymanA. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Sage.
44.
DevineP. G.AshT. L. (2022). Diversity training goals, limitations, and promise: A review of the multidisciplinary literature. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060221-122215
45.
DiAngeloR. (2011). White fragility. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 54–70.
DumasT. L.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2015). The professional, the personal, and the ideal worker: Pressures and objectives shaping the boundary between life domains. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 803–843. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1028810
48.
DurkheimE. (1933). The division of labor in society. Macmillan. (Original work published 1887).
49.
*ElmanB.Shahani-DenningC.KollarA.KopitnikoffS. (2018). Do agentic female managers receive social backlash from workers? An empirical study. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 158–172.
50.
ErskineS. E.BilimoriaD. (2019). White allyship of Afro-Diasporic women in the workplace: A transformative strategy for organizational change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819848993
51.
EstesB.WangJ. (2008). Integrative literature review: Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Review, 7(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484308315565
52.
FaludiS. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. Crown.
53.
FenwickT. (2005). Conceptions of critical HRD: Dilemmas for theory and practice. Human Resource Development International, 8(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500100541
54.
*FergusonT. W. (2018). Female leadership and role congruity within the clergy: Communal leaders experience no gender differences yet agentic women continue to suffer backlash. Sex Roles, 78(5-6), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0803-6
55.
FodorE.KispeterE. (2014). Making the ‘reserve army’ invisible: Lengthy parental leave and women’s economic marginalisation in Hungary. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506814541796
56.
*FriedmanR. A.CraigK. M. (2004). Predicting joining and participating in minority employee network groups. Industrial Relations, 43(4), 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00362.x
57.
García JohnsonC. P.OttoK. (2019). Better together: A model for women and LGBTQ equality in the workplace. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00272
58.
GarrardJ. (2017). Health sciences literature review made easy: The Matrix Method (5th ed). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
59.
*GhislieriC.GattiP.MolinoM.CorteseC. G. (2017). Work-family conflict and enrichment in nurses: Between job demands, perceived organisational support and work-family backlash. Journal of Nursing Management, 25(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12442
60.
GoldbergC.B.RawskiS.L.PerryE.L. (2019). The direct and indirect effects of organizational tolerance for sexual harassment on the effectiveness of sexual harassment investigation training for HR managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21329
61.
GrahamK. M.McMahonB. T.KimJ. H.SimpsonP.McMahonM. C. (2019). Patterns of workplace discrimination across broad categories of disability.Rehabilitation Psychology, 64(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000227
62.
GuptaP.GuptaU.WadhwaS. (2020). Known and unknown aspects of workplace bullying: A systematic review of recent literature and future research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 19(3), 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320936812
63.
*HaarJ. M.SpellC. S. (2003). Where is the justice? Examining work-family backlash in New Zealand: The potential for employee resentment. New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(1), 59–74.
64.
*HaarJ. M.SpellC. S.O’DriscollM. P. (2004). The backlash against work/family benefits: Evidence from New Zealand. Compensation & Benefits Review, 36(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368703261393
65.
HardimanR.JacksonB.GriffinP. (2007). Conceptual foundations for social justice education. In AdamsM.BellL.A.GriffinP. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 35–66). Routledge.
66.
HarrisonD. A.HarrisonT.ShafferM. A. (2019). Strangers in strained lands: Learning from workplace experiences of immigrant employees. Journal of Management, 45(2), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318790648
67.
HechterM.HorneC. (2003). Theories of social order: A reader. Stanford University Press.
68.
*HegtvedtK. A.Clay-WarnerJ.FerrignoE. D. (2002). Reactions to injustice: Factors affecting workers’ resentment toward family-friendly policies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(4), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090109
69.
HillR. J. (2009). Incorporating queers: Blowback, backlash, and other forms of resistance to workplace diversity initiatives that support sexual minorities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308328128
70.
*HolladayC. L.KnightJ. L.PaigeD. L.QuiñonesM. A. (2003). The influence of framing on attitudes toward diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1065
71.
KarpH. B.SammourH. Y. (2000). Workforce diversity: Choices in diversity training programs & dealing with resistance to diversity.College Student Journal, 34(3), 451–451.
72.
*KidderD. L.LankauM. J.Chrobot-MasonD.MollicaK. A.FriedmanR. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022908
73.
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. E.Jr. (1998). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In HerekG. M. (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39–61). Sage.
74.
KulikC. T.PepperM. B.RobersonL.ParkerS. K. (2007). The rich get richer: Predicting participation in voluntary diversity training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 753–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.444
75.
LeeJ. (2023). A critical review and theorization of workplace backlash: Looking back and moving forward through the lens of social dominance theory. Human Resource Management Review, 33, (1). 100900, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100900
76.
LegaultL.GutsellJ. N.InzlichtM. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1472–1477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427918
77.
*LeichtC.GocłowskaM. A.Van BreenJ. A.de LemusS. M.Randsley de MouraG. (2017). Counter-stereotypes and feminism promote leadership aspirations in highly identified women. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00883
78.
*LivingstonR. W.RosetteA. S.WashingtonE. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders, Psychological Science, 23(4), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611428079
McCallL. (1992). Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism, and conceptions of social order. Theory and Society, 21(6), 837–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992814
81.
McCordM. A.JosephD. L.DhananiL. Y.BeusJ. M. (2018). A meta-analysis of sex and race differences in perceived workplace mistreatment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000250
82.
McMahonS.BanyardV. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015
83.
MeliouE.MallettO.RosenbergS. (2019). Being a self-employed older woman: From discrimination to activism.Work, Employment and Society, 33(3), 529–538.
*MishraS.KrayL. J. (2022). The mitigating effect of desiring status on social backlash against ambitious women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 102, 104355, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104355
86.
MobleyM.PayneT. (1992). Backlash! The challenge to diversity training. Training and Development, 46(12), 45–52.
87.
MooreM. E.KonradA. M.YangY.NgE. S.DohertyA. J. (2011). The vocational well-being of workers with childhood onset of disability: Life satisfaction and perceived workplace discrimination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.019
88.
*Moss-RacusinC. A.JohnsonE. R. (2016). Backlash against male elementary educators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12366
89.
*NetchaevaE.KouchakiM.SheppardL. D. (2015). A Man’s (precarious) place: Men’s experienced threat and self-assertive reactions to female superiors. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1247–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215593491
90.
NoonM. (2007). The fatal flaws of diversity and the business case for ethnic minorities. Work, Employment and Society, 21(4), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007082886
91.
*O’NeillO. A.O’Reilly IIIC. A. (2011). Reducing the backlash effect: Self-monitoring and women’s promotions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(4), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02008.x
92.
PearsonC. M.PorathC. L. (2004). On incivility, its impact and directions for future research. In GriffinR. W.O’Leary-KellyA. M. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 403–425). Jossey-Bass.
93.
PerriginoM. B.DunfordB. B.WilsonK. S. (2018). Work–family backlash: The “dark side” of work–life balance (WLB) policies. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 600–630. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0077
94.
PhelanJ. E.RudmanL. A. (2010). Reactions to ethnic deviance: The role of backlash in racial stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018304
95.
*PierceJ. L. (2003). “Racing for innocence”: Whiteness, corporate culture, and the backlash against affirmative action. Qualitative Sociology, 26(1), 53–70.
96.
PitcanM.Park‐TaylorJ.HayslettJ. (2018). Black men and racial microaggressions at work. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(4), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12152
97.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
98.
*RothausenT. J.GonzalezJ. A.ClarkeN. E.O’DellL. L. (1998). Family-friendly backlash-fact or fiction? The case of organizations on-site child care centers. Personnel Psychology, 51(3), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00257.x
99.
RudmanL. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.629
100.
RudmanL. A.PhelanJ. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
101.
*RudmanL. A.MescherK. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12017
102.
SanchezJ. I.MedkikN. (2004). The effects of diversity awareness training on differential treatment. Group & Organization Management, 29(4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103257426
103.
*ScheuerC. L.LoughlinC. (2020). Could the aging workforce reduce the agency penalty for female leaders? Re-Examining the think manager–think male stereotype. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.41
104.
*SchockA.-K.GruberF. M.ScherndlT.OrtnerT. M. (2019). Tempering agency with communion increases women’s leadership emergence in all-women groups: Evidence for role congruity theory in a field setting. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.003
105.
SharpR.FranzwayS.MillsJ.GillJ. (2012). Flawed policy, failed politics? Challenging the sexual politics of managing diversity in engineering organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(6), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00545.x
106.
ShoreL. M.Chung-HerreraB. G.DeanM. A.EhrhartK. H.JungD. I.RandelA. E.SinghG. (2009). Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going?Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.004
107.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In JostJ. T.SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 315–332). Psychology Press.
108.
*SiegelJ. A.SawyerK. B. (2020). “We don’t talk about feelings or struggles like that”: White men’s experiences of eating disorders in the workplace. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000253
109.
SkarlickiD. P.KulikC. (2005). Third party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. In StawB.KramerR. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 183–230). JAI Press.
110.
*SkewesL.FineC.HaslamN. (2018). Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash. PloS ONE, 13(7), Article e0200921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200921
111.
*SmithsonJ.StokoeE. H. (2005). Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating “genderblind” terms in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x
112.
SolorzanoD.CejaM.YossoT. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73.
113.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M.TorinoG. C.BucceriJ. M.HolderA.NadalK. L.EsquilinM. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. The American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
114.
*TanX.ZuoB.WenF.XieZ.SongS. (2021). Fear of backlash moderates female senior executives' communion (but not agency) as compared to female Lecturers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 520590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.520590
115.
*TaylorM. C. (1995). White backlash to workplace affirmative action: Peril or myth?Social Forces, 73(4), 1385–1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580452
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
118.
ValentineS. R.GiacaloneR. A.FleischmanG. (2020). Workplace bullying, socially aversive attitudes, reduced work group effectiveness, and organizational frustration. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(2). 131–153, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21418
*WilkinsonK.TomlinsonJ.GardinerJ. (2018). The perceived fairness of work–life balance policies: A UK case study of solo-living managers and professionals without children. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12181
122.
YeungA. W.KayA. C.PeachJ. M. (2014). Anti-feminist backlash: The role of system justification in the rejection of feminism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213514121
