Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

I share the results of my learning journeys as Editor of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR) and Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ). I begin by sharing my experiences at both journals, followed by Lessons Learned, Advice and Implications for Editors, Advice and Implications for Authors and Doctoral Students, and Final Thoughts. Rigor, relevance, replicability, and refutability (four Rs) are put forth as major considerations for a quality journal and attaining and improving a Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) factor score. Having a developmental orientation toward prospective authors and a strong, active Editorial Board are highlighted as being vital for building the visibility and reputation of the journal. Social media as a visibility tool is also explored.

Keywords

foundations of human resource development rigor relevance replicability refutability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2017). Criteria for evaluating qualitative research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21282

Nimon

(2017). HRDQ submissions of quantitative research reports: Three common comments in decision letters and a checklist. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21290

Nimon

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2011a). Measurement invariance: A foundational principle for quantitative theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 10(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311399731

Nimon

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2011b). Regression commonality analysis: A technique for quantitative theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311411077

Nimon

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2011c). The use of canonical commonality analysis for quantitative theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 10(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311417682

Popper

(1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Springer.

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2010a). The ongoing quest for theory-building research methods articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371448

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2010b). The threat of common method variance bias to theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 9(4), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310380331

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2011). Where do we go from here? [Editorial]. Human Resource Development Review, 10(4), 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311417553

10.

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2019). Curiosity is welcome here. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29(2), 131–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21357

11.

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2020). The quest for novelty. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(3), 247–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21409

12.

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. (2021). The ten research questions: An analytic tool for critiquing empirical studies and teaching research rigor. Human Resource Development Review, 20(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211025182

13.

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. Petrosko

J. M.

Wiswell

A. K.

Thongsukmag

(2006). The measurement and conceptualization of curiosity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.167.2.117-135

14.

Reio

T. G.

Werner

J. M.

Werner

J. M.

(2017). Publishing mixed methods research: Thoughts and recommendations concerning rigor. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(4), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21291

15.

Russ-Eft

(2008). SSCI, ISI, JCR, JIF, IF, and journal quality. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(3), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1235

16.

Sanders-Reio

Alexander

P. A.

Reio

T. G.,

Jr. Newman

(2014). Do students’ beliefs about writing relate to their writing self-efficacy, apprehension, and writing performance? Learning and Instruction, 33, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.001

17.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

An Editor’s Learning Journey: Lessons for Moving the Field Forward

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References