This review of the literature focuses on an increasingly prevalent global phenomenon known as national occupational standards (NOSs). As the term suggests, NOSs present specific information describing the requirements for individuals’ qualifications to enter and perform successfully in a specific occupation. Many countries rely upon information from NOSs as part of their broader workforce development efforts. In spite of their prevalence, there remain critical questions about their eventual adoption by employers, a situation that HRD researchers could potentially help address based on the unique perspective of the HRD field. This paper seeks to review what is known about NOSs, to discuss the challenges related to their implementation at the organizational and national levels, and finally, to propose how HRD researchers, through their unique perspectives, might contribute to addressing the challenges most commonly encountered when implementing NOSs. It is expected that through this greater awareness, HRD professionals might be able to advance the effective use of this important global phenomenon.
*CsehM.ManikothN. (2012). The future of human resource development: Shaping national human resource development policies in the global context. Freeman, 1.
7.
*DodridgeM. (2001, August). Developing occupational standards in engineering degree programmes. In International conference on engineering education (pp. 6–10), Oslo, Norway.
8.
*DraganidisF.MentzasG. (2006). Competency based management: A review of systems and approaches. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220610648373
9.
*EisenbergerR.RhoadesL.CameronJ. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1026–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1026
10.
*FriedmanB. A.CorneliusE. T. (1976). Effect of rater participation in scale contruction on the psychometric characteristics of two rating scale formats. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.210
11.
*HagerP.GoncziA.AthanasouJ. (1994). General issues about assessment of competence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1), 3–16.
*HenemanR. L.LedfordG. E.Jr. (1998). Competency pay for professionals and managers in business: A review and implications for teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008076926413
14.
*HenemanR. L.von HippelC. (1997). The assessment of job performance: Focusing attention on context, process, and group issues. In LewinD.MitchellD. J. B.ZaidiM. A. (Eds.), The Human resource management handbook (pp. 79–109). JAI Press.
*JacobsR. L. (2019). Work analysis in the knowledge economy: Documenting what people do in the workplace for human resource development. Palgrave Macmillan.
KenneyJ.ReidM. (1986). Training intervention. Institute of Personnel Management.
19.
*KimJ. (2014). Implications of Australia’s vocational education and training (VET) system for Korea. Journal of Skills and Qualifications, 3(1), 107–126. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A241212
KimS.ChungK. (2018). A study on the application of national competency standards (NCS) to 4-year universities in South Korea—focused on the case of k-univ. Journalism and Mass Communication, 8(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.17265/2160-6579/2018.01.003
22.
*KinT. M.KareemO. A.NordinM. S.BingK. W. (2014). The development of a principal change leadership competency model: A structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 42(2), 3–43.
23.
*LesterS. (2001). Professional accreditation and national vocational qualifications: An exchange of experience. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 53(4), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820100200178
24.
*LesterS. (2015). Competence standards and frameworks: Some lessons from the United Kingdom. Polish Journal of Continuing Education, 3(90), 132–141. http://devmts.org.uk/ukcompetence.pdf
25.
*LynhamS. A.CunninghamP. W. (2006). National human resource development in transitioning societies in the developing world: Concept and challenges. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422305283150
26.
*NaS.KimJ.KimJ.JeongY.GuJ.KimK.MoonS. (2007). Developing system for the application of NCS. Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 39(1), 191–215.
27.
*OhH. (2002). NHRD model and HRD policy. Asian Journal of Education, 3(2), 191–218.
*PasuraR. (2014). Neoliberal economic markets in vocational education and training: Shifts in perceptions and practices in private vocational education and training in Melbourne, Australia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(4), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.906300
30.
RoccoT. S.SteinD.LeeC. (2003). An exploratory examination of the literature on age and HRD policy development. Human Resource Development Review, 2(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303002002004
31.
*RothwellW. J.LindholmJ. E. (1999). Competency identification, modelling and assessment in the USA. International Journal of Training and Development, 3(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2419.00069
*SilvermanS. B.WexleyK. N. (1984). Reaction of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology, 37(4), 703–710.
34.
*SpencerL. M.SpencerS. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.
35.
TorracoR. J.SwansonR. A. (1995). The strategic roles of human resource development. People and Strategy, 18(4), 10.
