The ascension of women into top leadership roles in male-dominated industries and organizations in the United States remains significantly low despite inroads women have made over the past two decades. The scarcity of women in leadership has been attributed to gendered traits and socialized beliefs that inform organizational cultures. However, research suggests that leaders can also influence organizational culture because they model the primary principles undergirding workplace cultures. This systematic review sought to understand how women’s leadership has been described in influencing male-dominated organizational cultures. Three major themes were identified to answer the research question—Strategic Femininity, Shared Power, and Change Agents. Using the analogy of inertia and force, a discussion of the findings and implications for human resource development (HRD) research and practice are presented.
AckerJ. (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31, 214-224.
ArmstrongK. L. (2007). The nature of Black women’s leadership in community recreation sport: An illustration of Black feminist thought. Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal, 16(1), 3-15.
4.
BaduraK. L.GrijalvaE.NewmanD. A.YanT. T.JeonG. (2018). Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model. Personnel Psychology, 71, 335-367.
5.
Baskerville-WatkinsM. B.SmithA. N. (2014). Importance of women’s political skill in male-dominated organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29, 206-222.
6.
BatesR.HatcherT.HoltonE.ChalofskyN. (2001). Redefining human resource development: An integration of the learning, performance, and spirituality of work perspectives. In AliagaO. A. (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development 2001 Conference Proceedings (pp. 205-212). Academy of Human Resource Development: Tulsa, OK.
7.
BeamR. A.Di CiccoD. T. (2010). When women run the newsroom: Management change, gender, and the news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 393-411.
8.
BieremaL. (2009). Critiquing human resource development’s dominant masculine rationality and evaluating its impact. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 68-96.
9.
BieremaL. (2016). Women’s leadership: Troubling notions of the “Ideal” (male) leaders. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18, 119-136.
10.
BieremaL. (2017). No woman left behind. In MadsenS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 145-162). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
BlighM. C.KohlesJ. C. (2008). Negotiating gender role expectations: Rhetorical leadership and women in the U.S. Senate. Leadership, 4, 381-402.
12.
BowerG. G.HumsM. A. (2013). Career paths of women working in leadership positions within intercollegiate athletic administration. Advancing Women in Leadership, 33, 1-14.
13.
BowlingC. J.KelleherC. A.JonesJ.WrightD. S. (2006). Cracked ceilings, firmer floors, and weakening walls: Trends and patterns in gender representation among executives leading American state agencies, 1970-2000. Public Administration Review, 66, 823-836.
14.
BradyD.IsaacsK.ReevesM.BurrowayR.ReynoldsM. (2011). Sector, size, stability, and scandal: Explaining the presence of female executives in Fortune 500 firms. Gender in Management, 26, 84-105.
15.
BurtonL. (2015). Under-representation of women in sport leadership: A review of research. Sport Management Review, 18, 155-165.
ChoJ. Y.LeeE. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19, 1-20.
19.
ColbyS. L.OrtmanJ. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 (U.S. Census Current Population Reports No. P25-1143). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
20.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
EaglyA. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 1-12.
22.
EaglyA. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance?Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 199-222.
23.
FinkJ. (2016). Hiding in plain sight: The embedded nature of sexism in sport. Journal of Sport Management, 30, 1-7.
24.
FisherM. (2015). Wall Street women: Professional saviors of the global economy. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 11, 137-155.
25.
FitzsimmonsT. W.CallanV. J.PaulsenN. (2014). Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top?The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 245-266.
26.
FrenchE.StrachanG. (2015). Women at work! Evaluating equal employment policies and outcomes in construction. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34, 227-243.
27.
FrontieraJ. (2010). Leadership and organizational culture transformation in professional sport. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 71-86.
28.
GillK.JonesS. J. (2013). Fitting in: Community college female executive leaders share their experiences: A study in West Texas. Journal about Women in Higher Education, 6, 48-70.
29.
GroysbergB.ConnollyK. (2013, September). Great leaders who make the mix work. Harvard Business Review, pp. 68-76.
30.
HaileS.EmmanuelT.DzatorA. (2016). Barriers and challenges confronting women for leadership and management positions: Review and analysis. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 13, 36-51.
31.
HandaR.SinghB. (2015). Women directors and IPO underpricing: Evidence from Indian markets. Gender in Management, 30, 186-205.
32.
HatchM. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 657-693.
33.
HatchM. J. (2004). Dynamics in organizational culture. In PooleM. S.Van de VenA. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 190-211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
HatchM. J. (2010). Culture Stanford’s Way. In SchoonhovenC. B.DobbinF. (Eds.), Stanford’s Organization Theory Renaissance, 1970-2000 (pp. 71-96). Stanford: Emerald Group Publishing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 28. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028009
35.
HatchM. J.ZilberT. (2012). Conversation at the border between organizational culture theory and institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 94-97.
36.
HelfatC. E.HarrisD.WolfsonP. J. (2006). The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of U.S. Corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 42-64.
37.
HendersonL. S.StackmanR. W.KohC. Y. (2013). Women project managers: The exploration of their job challenges and issue selling behaviors. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6, 761-791.
38.
HerreraR.DuncanP. A.GreenM. T.SkaggsS. L. (2012). The effect of gender on leadership and culture. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 31(2), 37-48.
39.
HernandezK. C.NgunjirjiF. W.ChangH. (2015). Exploiting the margins in higher education: a collaborative auto ethnography of three foreign-born female faculty of color. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28, 533-551.
HooblerJ. M.MastersonC. R.NkomoS. M.MichelE. J. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44, 2473-2499.
IbarraH.ElyR.KolbD. (2013, September). Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, pp. 61-66.
44.
IsaacC.GriffinL. (2015). Women chairs in academic medicine: Engendering strategic intuition. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 29, 498-514.
45.
JacksonA. R.AlbertiJ. L.SnipesR. L. (2014). An examination of the impact of gender on leadership style and employee job satisfaction in the modern workplace. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 18, 141-153.
46.
JandeskaK. E.KraimerM. L. (2005). Women’s perceptions of organizational culture, work, attitudes, and role-modeling behaviors. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 461-478.
47.
JonsenK.MaznevskiM. L.SchneiderS. C. (2010). Gender differences in leadership: Believing is seeing: Implications for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29, 549-572.
48.
KaiserC. R.SpaldingK. E. (2015). Do women who succeed in male-dominated domains help other women? The moderating role of gender identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 599-608.
49.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589-617.
LakshmiS. V.PeterA. J. (2015). Gender difference and its implications for organizational effectiveness: Real or constructed. Journal of Contemporary Management Research, 9, 52-79.
52.
LaPierreT. A.ZimmermanM. K. (2012). Career advancement and gender equity in healthcare management. Gender in Management, 27, 100-118.
53.
LyonsS. T.NgE. S.SchweitzerL. (2014). Changing Demographics and the Shifting Nature of Careers: Implications for Research and Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Review, 13, 181-206.
54.
MastracciS.ArreolaV. I. (2016). Gendered organizations: How human resource management practices produce and reproduce administrative man. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38, 137-149.
55.
McDonaldS. (2011). What’s in the “old boys” network? Accessing social capital in gendered and racialized networks. Social Networks, 33, 317-330.
56.
McLeanG. N.BeigiM. (2016). The importance of worldviews on women’s leadership to HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 18, 260-270.
57.
MendezM. J.BusenbakJ. R. (2015). Shared leadership and gender: All members are equal . . . but some more than others. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 17-34.
58.
Mendez-MorseS.MurakamiE. T.Byrne-JimenezM.HernandezF. (2015). Mujeres in the principal’s office: Latina school leaders. Journal of Latinos and Education, 14, 171-187.
59.
MerriamS. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In MerriamS. B. and Associates (Eds.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis (3-16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
NantonC. R. (2015). Shaping leadership culture to sustain future generations of women leaders. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 12, 92-112.
NorthouseP. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
O’NeilD. A.HopkinsM. M.BilimoriaD. (2008). Women’s careers at the start of the 21st century: Patterns and paradoxes. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 727-743.
65.
O’ReillyC. A.CaldwellD. F.ChatmanJ. A.DoerrB. (2014). The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO, personality, culture, and firm performance. Group & Organization Management, 39, 595-625.
66.
OylerJ. D.PryorM. G.HadenS. S. P. (2011). The good ol’ boy system: Alive and well at Laocoön Aeronautics Corporation. Arden, NC: Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc.
67.
PettigrewA. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 570-581.
68.
PetersonL. C. (2014). “That’s a warp!” The organizational culture and characteristic of successful film crews. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 18, 89-114.
PlakhotnikM. S.RoccoT. S. (2011). What do we know, how much, and why it matters: Organizational culture and AHRD research 1994-2009. Human Resource Development Review, 10, 74-100.
72.
PostC.ByronK. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1546-1571.
73.
PowellG. N. (2011). The gender and leadership wars. Organizational Dynamics, 40, 1-9.
74.
ProcknowG.RoccoT. (2016). The unheard, unseen, and often forgotten: An examination of disability in the human resource development literature. Human Resource Development Review, 15, 379-403.
75.
RosetteA. S.TostL. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 221-235.
76.
SaldanaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
SartoreM. L.CunninghamG. B. (2007). Explaining the under-representation of women in leadership positions of sport organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Quest, 59, 244-265.
78.
ScheinE. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, Summer1983, 13-28.
79.
ScheinE. H. (1984). Coming to an awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3-16.
80.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
81.
SeoG.HuangW.HanS. C. (2017). Conceptual review of underrepresentation of women in senior leadership positions from a perspective of gendered social status in the workplace: Implication for HRD research and practice. Human Resource Development Review, 16, 35-59.
82.
SimpsonR.LewisP. (2005). An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: Re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility. Human Relations, 58, 1253-1275.
83.
SmithA. E. (2015). On the edge of a glass cliff: Women in leadership in public organizations. Public Administration Quarterly, 39, 484-517.
84.
SmithC.SantucciD.XuS.CoxA.HendersonK. A. (2012). “I love my job, but . . .”: A narrative analysis of women’s perceptions of their careers in parks and recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 44(1), 52-69.
85.
SmithP.CaputiP.CrittendenN. (2012). A maze of metaphors around glass ceilings. Gender in Management, 27, 436-448.
86.
SpitzJ. (2010). CEO gender and the malt brewing industry: Return of the beer witch, ale-wife, and brewster. Forum for Social Economics, 39, 33-42.
87.
StelterN. (2002). Gender differences in leadership: Current social issues and future organizational implications. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(4), 88-99.
88.
Storberg-WalkerJ.GardinerR. A. (2017). Authentic leadership in HRD—Identity Matters! Critical explorations on leading authentically. Human Resource Development Review, 19, 350-361.
89.
SyedJ.MurrayP. A. (2008). A cultural feminist approach towards managing diversity in top management teams. Equal Opportunities International, 27, 413-432.
TimberlakeS. (2005). Social capital and gender in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 24, 34-44.
92.
TorracoR. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
93.
TorracoR. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15, 404-428.
94.
TrinidadC.NormoreA. H. (2005). Leadership and gender: A dangerous liaison?Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26, 574-590.
95.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity (Report 1057) (Data file).
U.S. Department of Labor Women’s Bureau. (2014). Nontraditional occupations for women in 2014 (Data file).
98.
VecchioR. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643-671.
99.
VinkenburgC. J.van EngenM. L.EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion?The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 10-21.
100.
WalkerR. C.AritzJ. (2015). Women doing leadership: Leadership styles and organizational culture. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 452-478.
101.
WellsJ. E.AicherT. J. (2013). Follow the leader: A relational demography, similarity attraction, and social identity theory of leadership approach of a team’s performance. Gender Issues, 30(1-4), 1-14.
102.
WeyerB. (2007). Twenty years later: Explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review, 22, 482-496.
