This study examines hashtag activism on LinkedIn through the #WomenAtWork initiative, focusing on how it exposes and challenges workplace bullying against women. Using over 15,000 LinkedIn posts from January 2023 through March 2025, this study applies a multilingual, multimodal, mixed-methods approach combining computational topic modeling, interaction analysis, and qualitative interpretation. Findings reveal that emotionally authentic and professionally grounded personal narratives generate significantly higher engagement than institutional or policy-focused posts, highlighting the power of personal storytelling in shaping digital discourse on gendered workplace mistreatment.
Acquadro MaranD.MinnitiD.PresuttiM.AlesinaM.BrizioA.GattiP. (2023). Workplace bullying among healthcare professionals: A quanti-qualitative survey in a sample of women working in an Italian healthcare setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5859.
2.
AfnanT.HuangH.SclafaniM.BashirM. (2019). Putting a price on social movements: A case study of #MeToo on Instagram. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 1–9.
3.
AliF.KramarR. (2015). An exploratory study of sexual harassment in Pakistani organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 229–249.
4.
Artar-BıyıklarM. A.BalcıoğluY. S. (2025). Breaking the silence: Women’s reproductive health in the workplace through collective voice. Gender Work and Organization, 32(6), 2353–2368.
5.
BarrettA. E.MimbsH.SoulieB.BastowS.Dominguez-SandruR.MichaelC.FrostM. (2025). Gray hair and pink slips: An analysis of Twitter responses to gendered ageism. Journal of Women & Aging, 37(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2024.2380933
6.
BoydD. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 47–66). Routledge.
7.
BraetA. C. (1992). Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle’s rhetoric: A re-examination. Argumentation, 6(3), 307–320.
8.
BucherT. (2018). If. . . then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
9.
ChamberlainL. J.CrowleyM.TopeD.HodsonR. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizational context. Work and Occupations, 35(3), 262–295.
CouldryN. (2010). Theorising media as practice. Theorising Media and Practice, 4(4), 35–54.
12.
DavisJ. L.JurgensonN. (2016). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. In EarlJ.KimportK. (Ed.), Current research on information technologies and society (pp. 86–95). Routledge.
13.
DiMaggioP.NagM.BleiD. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606.
14.
DuffyB. E.HundE. (2015). “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115604337.
15.
GerbaudoP. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Books.
16.
GillespieT. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In GillespieT.BoczkowskiP. J.FootK. A. (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). MIT Press.
17.
GrimmerJ.StewartB. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297.
18.
GruberJ. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender & Society, 12(3), 301–320.
19.
HennekamS.BennettD. (2017). Sexual harassment in the creative industries: Tolerance, culture and the need for change. Gender Work and Organization, 24(4), 417–434.
20.
HertzogJ. L.WrightD.BeatD. (2008). There’sa policy for that: A comparison of the organizational culture of workplaces reporting incidents of sexual harassment. Behavior and Social Issues, 17(2), 169–181.
21.
HullmanJ.DiakopoulosN. (2011). Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 17(12), 2231–2240.
22.
IslamT.RaihanT.UddinM. A. (2020). Sexual harassment at workplace: A systematic review of literature. Business Perspective Review, 2(2), 1–14.
23.
KietzmannJ. H.HermkensK.McCarthyI. P.SilvestreB. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
24.
LaDonnaK. A.CowleyL.FieldE.GinsburgS.WatlingC.PackR. (2025). Introducing the intruder paradox: “It’s not the imposter syndrome, it’s you don’t want me in the field”.. Medical Education, 59(10), 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15741
25.
LaDonnaK. A.FieldE.CowleyL.GinsburgS.WatlingC.PackR. (2024). Qualitative exploration of the #MeTooMedicine online discourse: “Holding beacons of light to shine in the corners they are hoping to keep dark.” Academic Medicine, 99(12), 1405–1412. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005828
26.
LarssonN. P.CravenL.MadsenI. (2023). The role of gender composition in workplace sexual harassment. European Journal of Public Health, 33(Supplement_2), ckad160.1327.
27.
McDonaldC. (2012). The social context of woman-to-woman intimate partner abuse (WWIPA). Journal of Family Violence, 27, 635–645.
28.
McDonaldP.CharlesworthS.GrahamT. (2016). Action or inaction: Bystander intervention in workplace sexual harassment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(5), 548–566.
29.
McEwenC.PullenA.RhodesC. (2021). Sexual harassment at work: A leadership problem. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 61, e00000008.
30.
MendesK.RingroseJ.KellerJ. (2018). MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Womens Studies, 25(2), 236–246.
31.
MorrisonE. W.MillikenF. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.
32.
PapacharissiZ. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
33.
PinderC. C.HarlosK. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In FerrisG. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 20, pp. 331–369). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
34.
PriyaP.SreejithS. S. (2025). Does organizational culture influence gender microaggressions in the workplace? A grounded theory approach. Equality Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 44(5), 524–540.
SalabayD. N.NurhaeniI. D. A.WahyunengsehR. D. (2024). Development of policies for preventing and handling workplace sexual harassment: A systematic literature review. E3S Web of Conferences, 593, 01004.
37.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
38.
SchneiderK. T.CarpenterN. J. (2020). Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: Incidents, coping responses, and social reactions. Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal, 39(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-09-2018-0161
39.
SemaanR.GamaiunovaL.TeixeiraP. P.NaterU. M.HeinzerR.Haba-RubioJ.VlerickP.CambierR.GomezP. (2025). Psychometric properties of telepressure measures in the workplace and private life among French-speaking employees. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02616-0
40.
ShenoyR.HarterR.UribeA.Abdel-RasoulM.TishkoJ.WeaverT.SteinE. (2025). Perceived sexual harassment and gender differences in anesthesiology: A cross-sectional survey. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1478340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1478340
