Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose:

Diabetes is a high risk factor for dementia. Employing a diabetic rat model, the present study was designed to determine whether the content of d-serine (d-Ser) in hippocampus is associated with the impairment of spatial learning and memory ability.

Methods:

Diabetes was induced by a single intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ). The insulin treatment began 3 days after STZ injection.

Results:

We found that both water maze learning and hippocampal CA1 long-term potentiation (LTP) were impaired in diabetic rats. The contents of glutamate, d-Ser, and serine racemase in the hippocampus of diabetic rats were significantly higher than those in the control group. Insulin treatment prevented the STZ-induced impairment in water maze learning and hippocampal CA1-LTP in diabetic rats and also maintained the contents of glutamate, d-Ser, and serine racemase at the normal range in hippocampus.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that insulin treatment has a potent protection effect on CA1-LTP, spatial learning and memory ability of the diabetic rats in vivo. Furthermore, insulin may take effect by inhibiting the overactivation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors, which play a critical role in neurotoxicity.

Keywords

insulin long-term potentiation water maze serine racemase

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is caused by the destruction of insulin-producing β cells of the pancreas. Type 1 diabetes mellitus can lead to cognitive impairments both in humans^1,2 and in animals.³ Although several factors such as vascular complications, metabolic disturbances, and the release of free radicals are implicated in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment, the mechanisms underlying these complications are not fully understood.

Long-term potentiation (LTP), a persistent and activity-dependent increase in synaptic strength, is widely regarded as a cellular mechanism underlying learning and memory.^4,5 The phenomenon of LTP at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses, called CA1-LTP, is intensively used as an experimental model for studying cellular underpinnings of learning in mammals.^5,6 Different lines of evidence corroborate that CA1-LTP also occurs naturally in the brain and, at least in several mammalian species, is essential for the acquisition of spatial memories.^5,7

Activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors is necessary for both induction of LTP^4,5 and form spatial learning.⁸ A remarkable feature of NMDA receptor activation is that, in addition to the agonist glutamate, it requires a coagonist glycine for its activation.⁹ A large body of evidence had demonstrated that d-serine (d-Ser) acts as an endogenous and obligatory coagonist for the glycine site of the NMDA receptors in the mammalian brain.^6,10 Serine racemes (SR), which converts l-serine to d-Ser, has recently been cloned from the mammalian brain.¹¹ Several lines of evidence have indicated that the regional profile of SR closely resembles those of the endogenous d-Ser and NMDA receptors with the highest level in the hippocampus.¹²

Apart from the physiological aspects of NMDA’s functions, studies have also demonstrated remarkable protective effects of the glycine site antagonists against NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal injury both in vitro ¹³ and in vivo,¹⁴ indicating that overactivation of NMDA receptors can be harmful to neurons.¹⁵

The previous studies have proved that streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes rats exhibited impaired CA1-LTP in vivo and severe deficits in spatial learning and memory. Further, treatment with insulin may prevent those impairments in STZ-induced diabetic rats.^16,17 In the present study, we sought to investigate whether the impairment of spatial learning and memory in STZ-induced diabetic rats are associated with an inappropriate activation of NMDA receptor, such as d-Ser and glutamine, and to provide a novel insight for the insulin prevention mechanisms in diabetes. This study may provide with new targeting sites and approaches for the treatment of diabetic spatial learning and memory impairment.

Material and Methods

Animals

Six-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (starting weight: 190-210 g) were purchased from Department of Liaoning Medical University (LMU) and were housed 2 rats per cage in an air-conditioned (humidity 50%-60%) and temperature-controlled (22°C ± 1°C) room under 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle, with free access to food and water throughout the experiments. Rats were weighed weekly. We used male rats exclusively to minimize any potential variability due to sex-specific effects in behavioral performance. Every effort was made to minimize the used animal number and their suffering. The Animal Care and Use Committee of LMU approved all procedures.

Animal Model of Diabetes and Treatment

Rats were fasted the night before drug administration and injected by caudal vein at a single dose of STZ (Sigma, Chaoyan District, Beijing, china 50 mg/kg of body weight) dissolved in citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.2) or citrate buffer only. Rats administered with citrate buffer were grouped as control (CON) animals (n = 10). Seventy-two hours after the STZ injection, blood glucose was determined in blood samples, obtained by tail prick, by a strip-operated blood glucose sensor (Onetouch Ultraeasy, Ningbo Qihao International Trade Co., Ltd). In all STZ-injected animals, blood glucose levels were >15.0 mmol/L and defined as diabetic rats.^17,18 The diabetic rats were then randomly divided into 2 groups: an untreated diabetic group (n = 9) and an insulin-treated diabetic (INS) group (n = 8). Insulin treatment was initiated directly after confirmation of diabetes and continued throughout the experiment. Insulin was administered through subcutaneous sustained release insulin implants at a dose ∼3 U/24 hour (Linplant; LinShin Canada, Canada). The inserted implants were removed at 48 days after insertion and new implants were inserted at once. The treatment schedule and the intervals for estimation of various parameters are illustrated in Figure 1. At 81 days after STZ injection, the rats were trained in water maze paradigm for spatial learning analysis and measured for LTP before killing for hippocampus preparation.

Figure 1.

The design of the treatment schedule and intervals of various parameters.

Morris Water Maze

At 81 days after the STZ injection, rats were subjected to the Morris water maze test to analyze cognitive function as previously reported.¹⁹ All experiments were carried out in a quiet, dimly lit room with larger designs in visible areas around severed as distal cues. Rat swam in a circular pool (2.1 m diameter, 0.8 m high) filled with 25°C ± 1°C water made opaque by polystyrene foam. Within the pool, a submerged platform (transparent, round, 8 cm diameter, 1 cm below surface) was hidden at the midpoint of 1 quadrant, and the location of the platform remained constant throughout training. The rat could climb on the platform to escape from the necessity of swimming.

During in nonvisible platform trial, each rat was placed on the platform for 20 seconds before being placed in 1 of the 3 remaining quadrants. The animals were left in the pool facing the wall and allowed to swim freely to the escape platform. The rat was given a maximum of 120 seconds to find the hidden platform and allowed to stay on it for 30 seconds. Rats that failed to locate the platform were put onto it by the experimenter. The animals were given acquisition trials on 5 consecutive days.

Following the 5-day training session, a probe trail was performed, in which the platform was removed and animals were allowed to search in the pool for 60 seconds. Measure the amount of time that the subject spent searching in each quadrant.

The swimming path and the escape latency (time to reach the platform) were recorded in real time by video camera assisted with Microcomputer Running Maze Software (Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Science). The mean escape latency and the percentage of time spent in the platform quadrant were calculated and used for statistical analysis.

Induction and Maintenance of CA1-LTP in Vivo

Urethane anesthetized rats were positioned in a stereotaxic instrument (−3 mm bite bar) and maintained at 37°C ± 1°C with a hot water heating pad. A concentric bipolar stimulating electrode was placed on Scherffer/Commissural collateral (3.8 mm posterior to bregma, 3.8 mm lateral to the midline, and 3.8 mm ventral). A glass micropipette recording electrode (3-5 µm tip diameter, 3 MΩ; 3.8 mm posterior to bregma, 1.8 mm lateral to the midline) was lowered into the dendrites of CA1 pyramidal until the maximal response was observed (2 mm ventral). The glass micropipettes filled with 3M KCl were used for extracellular recordings.

In order to determine the optimal placement of the stimulating and recording electrodes, constant-current cathode pulses of 0.1-millisecond duration were delivered every 10 seconds through the stimulating electrode as test stimuli before the formal experiment. Final positions of the stimulating and recording electrodes were confirmed by maximizing the amplitude of the field potential recorded in the CA1 region. Once the position of the electrodes was verified, recordings were allowed to stabilize for 30 minutes prior to the experiment. Baseline responses were recoding following the delivery of test stimulus every 60 seconds. The intensity of test stimulus current was adjusted at an intensity yielding 40% of the maximal amplitude of population spike (PS). The PS amplitude is measured by taking the distance between the negative minimum and the point that corresponds to the projection of the minimum on the line joining the 2 positive peaks. The LTP was induced by a train of high-frequency stimulation (HFS, 1 seconds 100 Hz stimulation). The PS was measured for 60 minutes after application of tetanic stimulation. The definition of LTP was regarded as 20% increase in amplitude of the average responses and lasted for 60 minutes.^17,20

Sample Preparation

After the completion of LTP determination, hippocampus was harvested and put it into liquid nitrogen immediately, then transferred to −80°C refrigerator till used.

Measurement of d-Ser Levels

The simultaneous determination of the l-glutamate (Glu) and d-Ser in the tissue sample was accomplished using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorometric detection as described previously.^21,22 Briefly, a tissue sample was homogenized in 10 volumes of 5% trichloroacetic acid after the addition of d-homocysteic acid, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 16 000g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was passed through a (Millipore filter, Millipore filter was provided by Phenomenex (Tianjin) Technology Development Co. Ltd.) and stored at −80°C until derivatization.

The resultant sample was derivatized with N-tertbutyloxycalbonyl-l-cycteine and o-phaldialdehyde for 2 minutes at room temperature. The amino acid derivative was immediately applied to the (Shimadzu HPLC system, Shenyang branch, shimadazu Co., Ltd). The HPLC System equipped with 2 LC-10A_VP pump compartments and an RF-10AXL fluorescence detector, and a CTO-10Avp Column Oven. Data were acquired and processed using the Lcsolution 1.23 software package from Shimadzu. Separation was carried out on a (Kromail C18 column , Phenomenex (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd) (4.6 × 150 mm², 4.6 μm).

Western Blotting Analysis of SR in Hippocampus

The hippocampus was sonicated briefly in ice-cold buffer. Following sonication, the soluble extract was obtained by centrifugation at 10 000g at 4°C 30 minutes. Protein concentration in the soluble was then measured using a Bradford assay, with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Protein of 20 mg for each sample was loaded in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gels. Blots were incubated with an SR rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz biotechnology, Pudong New District, Shanghai, china), followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-linked goat antirabbit immunoglobulin G, and developed using enhanced chemiluminescence.²³ Densitometric analysis of serine racemes (SR) was conducted using (Image J software, Wayne Rasband, National institutes of Health, USA) as described.^24,25

Statistical Analysis

SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Co, Ltd, Armonk, New York) was used to carry out all statistical analysis. Summary data are presented as group means ± standard deviation. The difference in measurement data among groups was analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett test when F was significant. P < .05 was considered significant statistically.

Results

Effect of the Insulin Treatment on the Body Weight and Blood Glucose in Diabetic rats

To verify the adverse effects of the diabetic model, we measured body weight and glucose levels of the blood plasma. Our results showed that, in contract to the citrate buffer-injected CON animals (CON group), the rats in the STZ-injected DM group failed to gain weight, and their body weight was significantly lower at the end of the experiment (P < .05; Table 1). In the INS rats group, the rats showed near-normal weight gain, and their final body weights were close to those of the CON group. Meanwhile, DM rats were developed with abnormally high blood glucose level compared to CON rats, whereas blood glucose level in the INS rats was relatively stable and close to those in CON group (P > .05; Table 2).

Table 1.

Effect of Insulin on Body Mass in Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Rats.^a

Group	n	Body Mass, g
Group	n	d 0	d 7	d 28	d 80	d 86
CON	10	218.1 ± 23.7	240.1 ± 24.6	295.1 ± 31.2	302.8 ± 33.7	304.0 ± 32.8
DM	9	224.0 ± 27.9	199.6 ± 27.8^b	201.7 ± 29.0^b	203.1 ± 33.8^b	200.0 ± 34.8^b
INS	8	219.0 ± 12.9	201.1 ± 13.6	267.6 ± 29.0^c	288.3 ± 18.0^c	289.5 ± 29.2^c

Abbreviations: CON, control; DM, untreated diabetic; INS, insulin-treated diabetic.

^aRats was injected by a single intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ) 50 mg/kg dissolved in citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.2) or citrate buffer only, and this day was defined as the 0 day (d 0). Three days after injection, blood glucose levels were >15.0 mmol/L in all STZ-injected rats. The STZ-injected rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: an untreated diabetic (DM) group and an insulin treated diabetic group (INS). Insulin was administered by implants. In contrast to the citrate buffer-treated CON group, the rats in DM group failed to gain weight, and their body weight was significantly lower at the end of the experiment. In INS group, rats showed near normal weight gain, and their final body weights were close to those of the CON group $\overline{x} \pm s$ .

^b P < .05, compared with CON group;

^c P < .05, compared with DM group.

Table 2.

Effect of Insulin on Blood Glucose in DM Rats.^a

Group	n	Blood glucose/mmol·L⁻¹
Group	n	d 0	d 3	d 28	d 80	d86
CON	10	5.7 ± 0.5	5.8 ± 0.3	5.9 ± 0.5	5.7 ± 0.5	5.7 ± 0.4
DM	9	5.7 ± 0.5	29.1 ± 5.1^b	29.0 ± 4.8^b	28.9 ± 3.4^b	28.1 ± 3.9^b
INS	8	5.8 ± 0.5	30.4 ± 3.5	6.8 ± 1.1^c	6.6 ± 1.2^c	6.6 ± 0.6^c

Abbreviations: CON, control; DM, untreated diabetic; INS, insulin-treated diabetic.

^aRats was injected by a single intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ) 50 mg/kg dissolved in citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.2) or citrate buffer only, and this day was defined as the 0 day (d 0). Three days after injection, blood glucose levels were >15.0 mmol/L in all STZ-injected rats. The STZ-injected rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: an untreated diabetic (DM) group and an insulin treated diabetic group (INS). Insulin was administered by implants. In contract to the CON rats, blood glucose level was significantly higher in DM rats, whereas blood glucose level in the INS rats was relatively stable and close to those in CON group $\overline{x} \pm s$ .

^b P < .05, compared with normal control group;

^c P < .05, compared with DM model group.

Effect of the Insulin Treatment on the Spatial Learning in Diabetic Rats

Morris water maze is regarded as a typical instrument to evaluate cognitive abilities of rodents. The hidden platform acquisition could reflect the function of hippocampus,²¹ and hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory of animals are frequently investigated in the water maze.²⁶ To test whether the DM would affect spatial learning and memory function in rats, we performed Morris water maze tests.

In the nonvisible trials, we observed that the rats in DM group took a longer time to find the platform on training days 3, 4, and 5 compared with rats in the CON group (Table 3). In the probe trials, DM group rats spent less time in the target quadrant compared with CON group rats (Table 3), and these differences were statistically significant (P < .05). There are no differences in nonvisible trials and the probe trials between CON and INS groups. We also found that the swimming speed was indistinguishable among 3 groups, so the performance deficit was unlikely to be due to motivational factors or sensorimotor deficits.

Table 3.

Effect of Insulin on Escape Latencies and Percentage of Time Spent in Target Quadrant of DM Rats.^a

Group	n	Escape Latency, s			Percentage of Time Spent in Target Quadrant, %
Group	n	d 83	d 84	d 85	d 86
CON	10	31.4 ± 5.0	25.0 ± 4.0	18.6 ± 7.1	36.5 ± 6.4
DM	9	41.2 ± 4.7^b	35.5 ± 6.3^b	31.7 ± 7.5^b	22.4 ± 6.0^b
INS	8	34.1 ± 5.3^c	27.3 ± 4.5^c	20.4 ± 4.8^c	35.6 ± 5.5^c

Abbreviations: CON, control; DM, untreated diabetic; INS, insulin-treated diabetic.

^aRats was injected by a single intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ) 50 mg/kg dissolved in citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.2) or citrate buffer only, and this day was defined as the 0 day (d 0). Three days after injection, blood glucose levels were >15.0 mmol/L in all STZ-injected rats. The STZ-injected rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: an untreated diabetic (DM) group and an insulin treated diabetic group (INS). Insulin was administered by implants. Morris water maze was begun on d 81. In the nonvisible trials, the rats in DM group took a longer time to find the platform on training days 3, 4, and 5 compared with the CON group. In the probe trials, DM group rats spent less time in the target quadrant compared with CON group rats, and these differences were statistically significant (P < .05). There are no differences in nonvisible trials and the probe trials between CON and INS group $\overline{x} \pm s$ .

^b P < .05, compared with normal control group.

^c P < .05, compared with DM model group.

On examination of the eyes, 7 of the 9 rats from the DM group had no evidence for cataract, and the other 2 rats had a unilateral cataract. There were no apparent differences in performance between diabetic rats with or without cataract. Previous studies in nondiabetic rats also show that impaired visual acuity does not invariably affect maze performance. Rats in which 1 eye is occluded perform as well as rats with binocular vision.²⁷ Moreover, even blind rats learn to locate the platform, although their performance can be slightly impaired as compared to CONs.²⁸

These results indicate that spatial learning and memory were significantly impaired in the diabetic rats, and insulin treatment could prevent such impairments and maintained the cognitive ability at normal level. These results are consistent with previous report.²⁹

Effect of the Insulin Treatment on the CA1-LTP of Hippocampus In Vivo

In vivo electrophysiological analysis within distinct subregions is an elegant strategy that permits both evaluation of synaptic plasticity together with network properties, where the contribution of the native neuronal circuitry is intact.³⁰ Using this approach, we investigated the effect of insulin treatment on CA1-LTP in diabetic rats.

Prior to the induction of LTP by HFS, PS amplitudes, which represent the baseline synaptic transmission, were examined. The average PS amplitude evoked by single pulse before HFS was 1.41 ± 0.02, 1.27 ± 0.04, 1.39 ± 0.02 mV in CON, DM, and INS, respectively (Figure 2A). There were no significant baseline differences among those groups.

Figure 2.

Effects of insulin treatment on the LTP in diabetic rats. A, The average PS amplitude evoked by single pulse before HFS (n = 6). B, The representative waveforms of PS amplitude before and after HFS in CA1 region of hippocampus. C, The time trends of the PS potentiation rate before and after HFS (n = 6). Baseline responses were recoding following the delivery of test stimulus every 60 seconds, checking the stability for 30 minutes. The LTP was induced by 1 seconds 100 Hz stimulation. The PS was measured for 60 minutes after application of tetanic stimulation. HFS indicates high-frequency stimulation; LTP, long-term potentiation; PS, population spike.

The effects of insulin treatment on the change in PS before and after HFS were examined. In DM group, the PS had no significant change compared with its baseline. In both the CON and the INS groups, the PS was significantly higher than its baseline after HFS (Figure 2B and C), and those changes can sustain at least for 60 minutes. These results showed that expression of CA1-LTP was significantly impaired in the DM rats when compared to the CON and INS group and that there were no distinguishable difference between CON and INS group.

Insulin Treatment Inhibits the Increase in d-Ser and Glutamine in the Hippocampus of Diabetic Rats

High-performance liquid chromatography analysis demonstrated a substantial increase in d-Ser and l-glutamine at hippocampus of DM group compared with CON group ([DM vs CON], d-Ser: 0.084 ± 0.005 vs 0.062 ± 0.007 mg/g, and l-glutamine: 1.550 ± 0.054 vs 1.113 ± 0.039 mg/g, P < .05, Figure 3). There was no significant difference in d-Ser and l-glutamine content at hippocampus between the INS group and CON group, suggesting that insulin has a potent effect on decreasing the content of glutamate, d-Ser in the hippocampus of diabetic rats, which in turn could avoid NMDA receptor overactivation.

Figure 3.

Effect of insulin on levels of glutamate (Glu), d-serine (d-Ser) in hippocampus of DM rats. See Table 1 for the legend. All the samples were stored at −80°C and were determined within 5 days. Values were normalized to CON group. There are substantial increases in d-serine and l-glutamine at hippocampus of DM group compared with CON group, but no significant difference in d-serine and l-glutamine content at hippocampus between the insulin-treated diabetic (INS) group and CON group $\overline{x} \pm s$ . *P < .05, compared with CON group; ^# P < .05, compared with DM model group. CON indicates control; DM, untreated diabetic.

Insulin Treatment Inhibits the Increase in SR in the Hippocampus of Diabetic Rats

The d-Serine levels in the CNS are controlled by degrading enzymes as well as synthetic enzymes. d-Serine exists mainly in the forebrain region, including the hippocampus and remains at a low level in the hindbrain. The hippocampus is rich in SR with extremely poor expression of d-amino acid oxidase (Dao), a d-Ser degrading enzyme. The activities of Dao in the hippocampus of both vehicle- and STZ-treated mice were at trace level.¹⁶ Previous studies have indicated that SR is the major enzyme for d-Ser production in the brain,¹⁴ so we assessed the content of SR by Western blots analysis in hippocampus. The result showed that the content of SR from DM rats was significantly increased as compared to CON (Figure 4), and the content of SR was kept at normal range after insulin treatment.

Figure 4.

Western bolt analysis of hippocampal SR protein levels in CON rats, DM rats and INS rats. A, The SR was detected as a single band at 37 kDa in hippocampal fractions isolated from control rats (CON), streptozotocin (STZ)-injected diabetic rats (DM), and insulin-treatment rats (INS). The SR was increased in DM and was restored back to normal level after insulin treatment (INS). B, Quantitative analysis of hippocampal SR protein levels (n = 3). *P < .05, compared with normal control group; ^# P < .05, compared with DM model group. DM indicates diabetes mellitus; SR, serine racemes.

Discussion

In the present study, we used a single-dose injection of STZ to induce diabetes in a rat model. The diabetogenic action of STZ is mediated through a reduction in NAD levels and formation of intracellular free radicals in the insulin-producing β cells of the isles of Langerhans. Streptozotocin is mainly taken up into the cell via the glucose transporter 2, which is absent at the blood–brain barrier; therefore, STZ itself does not affect the brain following intravenous administration.³¹ In our experiments, we found that cognitive ability was significantly impaired in diabetic rats, as demonstrated by both water maze (Table 3) and hippocampal CA1-LTP (Figure 2), whereas insulin treatment could prevent such functional impairments. These results are consistent with previous report.¹⁷ Previous studies have suggested that LTP-like forms of hippocampal synaptic plasticity is related to spatial learning and memory.^8,32,33 In the present study, both diabetes and insulin treatment consistently had parallel effects on water maze learning and hippocampal LTP.

Activation of NMDARs is a well-studied pathway for the induction of LTP.^4,5 d-Serine, an endogenous coagonist for NMDARs in the brain, binds the NMDAR glycine site to facilitate glutamate activation of the receptor.^6,34 But overload in extracellular glutamate and/or d-Ser levels, in both experimental brain trauma models and human, can lead to overstimulation of NMDAR expressed in neurons. Then, subsequent influx of free Ca²⁺ results in a cascade of excitotoxicity-related mechanisms culminating in neuronal damage.^{14,35

–39} Cell death assay indicated that primary spinal cord neurons from ALS mice were more vulnerable to NMDA toxicity than those from CON mice, in a d-Ser-dependent manner.³⁸ Our data showed that both glutamate and d-Ser are elevated at hippocampus in the DM group, and that insulin treatment could inhibit those elevations. Therefore, this study indicates that the elevated d-Ser and glutamate level in DM rat could be involved in the overactivation of NMDA receptors, which result in significant impairment in rats cognitive ability.

Because levels of d-Ser were found to be elevated in DM rat’s hippocampus, we next examined the changes in SR in our animal model. Compared to CON group, SR levels in hippocampus were significant higher in DM rats and were maintained within normal levels after preventative insulin treatment (Figure 4). These results indicated that the d-Ser increase in the hippocampus of DM is mediated by expressional alteration in SR. A study suggested that a single diabetic ketoacidosis episode causes measurable deficits in rats cognitive ability.⁴⁰ Using their definitions, the rats in our experiment may have been in diabetic ketoacidosis. We speculate that diabetic ketoacidosis could work as an inflammatory mediator in brain,⁴¹ then the inflammatory stimuli induce expression of more SR.⁴²

We also notice a report where the authors found that hippocampal d-Ser only increases at 1 week after STZ injection.¹⁶ We suppose that the profile of d-Ser change may be variable depending on different diabetes animal models. We will be actively addressing this question in our ongoing studies.

Conclusions

Insulin treatment can prevent the impairment of spatial learning and memory ability in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The mechanisms of insulin function are related to prevent the content of SR increase and finally result in maintenance of the content of d-Ser at the normal range in hippocampus. The experimental manipulation of SR activity and d-Ser level in the brain may lead to a novel strategy for neuroprotection against various neurodegenerative diseases.

Footnotes

Authors’ Note

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the grant No. 2013225305 from Liaoning Province science and technology plan project, China.

References

Brands

Kessels

Hoogma

. Cognitive performance, psychological well-being, and brain magnetic resonance imaging in older patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55 (6):1800–1806.

Hannonen

Komulainen

Eklund

Tolvanen

Riikonen

Ahonen

. Verbal and academic skills in children with early-onset type 1 diabetes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52 (7);e143–e147.

Zhang

Sima

. The role of impaired insulin/IGF action in primary diabetic encephalopathy. Brain Res. 2005;1037 (1-2):12–24.

Bliss

Collingridge

. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361 (6407):31–39.

Whitlock

Heynen

Shuler

Bear

. Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Science. 2006;313 (5790):1093–1097.

Henneberger

Papouin

Oliet

Rusakov

. Long-term potentiation depends on release of d-serine from astrocytes. Nature. 2010;463 (7278):232–236.

Morris

Anderson

Lynch

Baudry

. Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature. 1986;319 (6056):774–776.

Chen

Errington

Kneussel

. Behavioral deficits and subregion-specific suppression of LTP in mice expressing a population of mutant NMDA receptors throughout the hippocampus. Learn Mem. 2009;16 (10):635–644.

Kleckner

Dingledine

. Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Science. 1988;241 (4867):835–837.

10.

Schell

Brady

JR Molliver

Snyder

. d-Serine as a neuromodulator: regional and developmental localizations in rat brain glia resemble NMDA receptors. J Neurosci. 1997;17 (5):1604–1615.

11.

Wolosker

Blackshaw

Snyder

. Serine racemase: a glial enzyme synthesizing d-serine to regulate glutamate-N-methyl-d-aspartate neurotransmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96 (23):13409–13414.

12.

Yoshikawa

Kobayashi

Oka

Kawaguchi

Hashimoto

. Distribution and MK-801-induced expression of serine racemase mRNA in rat brain by real-time quantitative PCR. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004;128 (1):90–94.

13.

McNamara

Dingledine

. Dual effect of glycine on NMDA-induced neurotoxicity in rat cortical cultures. J Neurosci. 1990;10 (12):3970–3976.

14.

Inoue

Hashimoto

Harai

Mori

. NMDA- and beta-amyloid1-42-induced neurotoxicity is attenuated in serine racemase knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2008;28 (53):14486–14491.

15.

Hardingham

Bading

. The yin and yang of NMDA receptor signalling. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26 (2):81–89.

16.

Suzuki

Sasabe

Furuya

Mita

Hamase

Aiso

. Type 1 diabetes mellitus in mice increases hippocampal d-serine in the acute phase after streptozotocin injection. Brain Res. 2012;23:1466:167–176.

17.

Biessels

Kamal

Urban

Spruijt

Erkelens

Gispen

. Water maze learning and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in streptozotocin-diabetic rats: effects of insulin treatment. Brain Res. 1998;800 (1):125–135.

18.

Magarinos

McEwen

. Experimental diabetes in rats causes hippocampal dendritic and synaptic reorganization and increased glucocorticoid reactivity to stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97 (20):11056–11061.

19.

Morris

. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1984;11 (1):47–60.

20.

Zhang

Jin

Liu

. Effects of subchronic aluminum exposure on spatial memory, ultrastructure and l-LTP of hippocampus in rats. J Toxicol Sci. 2013;38 (2):255–268.

21.

Hashimoto

Nishikawa

Oka

Takahashi

. Endogenous D-serine in rat brain: N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-related distribution and aging. J Neurochem. 1993;60 (2):783–786.

22.

Grant

Shulman

Tibbo

Hampson

Baker

. Determination of d-serine and related neuroactive amino acids in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;844 (2):278–282.

23.

Kamel

Hoyos

Rochard

. Requirement for frzb and fzd7a in cranial neural crest convergence and extension mechanisms during zebrafish palate and jaw morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2013;381 (2):423–433.

24.

Kong

Jing

Yan

. Cloning and characterization of prisilkin-39, a novel matrix protein serving a dual role in the prismatic layer formation from the oyster pinctada fucata. J Biol Chem. 2009;284 (16):10841–10854.

25.

Kong

Grimaldi

Curtin

. Neural crest development and craniofacial morphogenesis is coordinated by nitric oxide and histone acetylation. Chem Biol. 2014;21 (4):488–501.

26.

Astur

Tropp

Sava

Constable

Markus

. Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation. Behav Brain Res. 2004;151 (1-2):103–115.

27.

Panakhova

Buresova

Bures

. The effect of binocular and monocular viewing conditions on performance of rats in the Morris water maze. Physiol Bohemoslov. 1986;35 (1):53–61.

28.

Lindner

Plone

Schallert

Emerich

. Blind rats are not profoundly impaired in the reference memory Morris water maze and cannot be clearly discriminated from rats with cognitive deficits in the cued platform task. Cogn Brain Res. 1997;5 (4):329–333.

29.

Biessels

Kamal

Ramakers

. Place learning and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetes. 1996;45 (9):1259–1266.

30.

Jedlicka

Schwarzacher

Winkels

. Impairment of in vivo u-burst long-term potentiation and network excitability in the dentate gyrus of synaptopodin-deficient mice lacking the spine apparatus and the cisternal organelle. Hippocampus. 2009;19 (2):130–140.

31.

Gispen

Biessels

. Cognition and synaptic plasticity in diabetes mellitus. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23 (11):542–549.

32.

Bourtchuladze

Frenguelli

Blendy

Cioffi

Schutz

Silva

. Deficient long-term memory in mice with a targeted mutation of the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein. Cell. 1994;79 (1):59–68.

33.

Tsien

Huerta

Tonegawa

. The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell. 1996;87 (7):1327–1338.

34.

Wolosker

Dumin

Balan

Foltyn

. D-Amino acids in the brain: d-serine in neurotransmission and neurodegeneration. FEBS J. 2008;275:3514–3526.

35.

Hazell . Excitotoxic mechanisms and the role of astrocytic glutamate transporters in traumatic brain injury. Neurochem Int. 2006;48 (5):394–403.

36.

Chen

Liao

Kuo

. Gliotoxic action of glutamate on cultured astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2000;75 (4):1557–1565.

37.

Shleper

Kartvelishvily

Wolosker

. d-Serine is the dominant endogenous coagonist for NMDA receptor neurotoxicity in organotypic hippocampal slices. J Neurosci. 2005;25 (41):9413–9417.

38.

Sasabe

Chiba

Yamada

. d-Serine is a key determinant of glutamate toxicity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. EMBO J. 2007;26 (41):4149–4159.

39.

Mustafa

Ahmad

Zeynalov

. Serine racemase deletion protects against cerebral ischemia and excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2010;30 (4):1413–1416.

40.

Glaser

Anderson

Leong

Tancredi

O'Donnell

. Cognitive dysfunction associated with diabetic ketoacidosis in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2012;510 (2):110–114.

41.

Hoffman

Stamatovic

Andjelkovic

. Inflammatory mediators and blood brain barrier disruption in fatal brain edema of diabetic ketoacidosis. Brain Res. 2009;1254:138–148.

42.

Barger

. Induction of serine racemase by inflammatory stimuli is dependent on AP-1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1035:133–146.

Insulin Treatment Prevents the Increase in D -Serine in Hippocampal CA1 Area of Diabetic Rats

Abstract

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Material and Methods

Animals

Animal Model of Diabetes and Treatment

Morris Water Maze

Induction and Maintenance of CA1-LTP in Vivo

Sample Preparation

Measurement of d-Ser Levels

Western Blotting Analysis of SR in Hippocampus

Statistical Analysis

Results

Effect of the Insulin Treatment on the Body Weight and Blood Glucose in Diabetic rats

Effect of the Insulin Treatment on the Spatial Learning in Diabetic Rats

Effect of the Insulin Treatment on the CA1-LTP of Hippocampus In Vivo

Insulin Treatment Inhibits the Increase in d-Ser and Glutamine in the Hippocampus of Diabetic Rats

Insulin Treatment Inhibits the Increase in SR in the Hippocampus of Diabetic Rats

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

Authors’ Note

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References