Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term stability and reliability of a brief computerized cognitive battery in established dementia types. Method: Patients were administered the computerized battery twice with administrations approximately 2 hours apart, with intervening conventional neuropsychological tests. Patients were classified clinically, via consensus conference, as healthy controls (n = 23), mild cognitive impairment (n = 20), Alzheimer’s disease (n = 52), dementia with Lewy Bodies ([DLB], n = 10), or frontotemporal dementia (n = 9). Results: Minimal practice effects were evident across Cog-State test administrations. Small magnitude improvements were seen across all groups on a working memory task, and healthy controls showed a mild practice effect on the accuracy of associative learning. Conclusions: In established dementia, administration of the CogState tasks appears sensitive to cognitive impairment in dementia. Repeat administration also provided acceptable stability and test-retest reliability with minimal practice effects at short test-retest intervals despite intervening cognitive challenges.
Johnson DK, Storandt M., Morris JC, Langford ZD, Galvin JECognitive profiles in dementia: Alzheimer disease vs healthy brain aging. Neurology. 2008;71(22):1783-1789.
2.
Anastasi A., Urbina S.Psychological Testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.
3.
McCaffrey R., Duff K., Westervelt H.Practitioner’s guide to evaluating change with neuropsycholgical assessment instruments. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers; 2000 .
4.
Bartels C., Wegrzyn M., Wiedl A., Ackermann V., Ehrenreich H.Practice effects in healthy adults: a longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing. BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11:118.
5.
Collie A., Maruff P., Darby DGThe effects of practice on cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals at brief test-retest intervals. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9(3): 419-428.
6.
Dingwall KM, Lewis MS, Maruff P., Cairney S.Reliability of repeated cognitive testing in healthy Indigenous Australian adolescents. Australian Psychol.2009;44(2):224-234.
7.
Falleti MG, Maruff P., Collie A., Darby DGPractice effects associated with the repeated assessment of cognitive function using the CogState battery at 10-minute, one week and one month test-retest intervals. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006; 28(7):1095-1112.
8.
Pietrzak RH, Snyder P., Jackson CE, et al. Stability of cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia over brief and intermediate re-test intervals. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exper.2009;24(2): 113-121.
9.
Darby D., Maruff P., Collie A., McStephen M.Mild cognitive impairment can be detected by multiple assessments in a single day. Neurology. 2002;59(7):1042-1046.
10.
Maruff P., Thomas E., Cysique L., et al. Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol.2009; 24(2):165-178.
11.
Ellis KA, Bush AI, Darby D., et al. The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr.2009; 21(4):672-687.
12.
Morris JC, Weintraub S., Chui HC, et al. The Uniform Data Set (UDS): clinical and cognitive variables and descriptive data from Alzheimer Disease Centers. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006; 20(4):210-216.
13.
Petersen RCMild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity . J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):183-194.
14.
McKhann G., Drachman D., Folstein M., Katzman R., Price D., Stadlan EMClinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984;34(7):939-944.
15.
Neary D., Snowden JS, Gustafson L., et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51(6):1546-1554.
16.
McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J., et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005 ;65(12):1863-1872.
17.
Wechsler D.WAIS-III/WMS-III Technical Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
18.
Wechsler D.Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
19.
Armitage SGAn analysis of certain psychological tests used in the evaluation of brain injury. Psychol Monogr. 1946; 60(5):1-48.
Arthur A., Jagger C., Lindesay J., Graham C., Clarke M.Using an annual over-75 health check to screen for depression: validation of the short Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) within general practice. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14(3): 431-439.
24.
Koeppe RA, Frey KAEquilibrium analysis of [11C]PIB studies. Neuroimage. 2008;41(3):T30-T30.
25.
Suotunen T. , Hirvonen J., Immonen-Räihä P., et al. Visual assessment of [(11)C]PIB PET in patients with cognitive impairment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(6): 1141-1147.
26.
Salmon DP, Bondi MWNeuropsychological assessment of dementia. Annu Rev Psychol.2009;60(5):257-282.
27.
Rabinovici GD, Furst AJ, O’Neil JP, et al. 11C-PIB PET imaging in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2007;68(15):1205-1212.
28.
Rowe CC, Ng S., Ackermann U., et al. Imaging beta-amyloid burden in aging and dementia. Neurology. 2007;68(20): 1718-1725.
29.
Engler H., Santillo AF, Wang SX, et al. In vivo amyloid imaging with PET in frontotemporal dementia . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(2):100-106.
30.
Fredrickson J., Maruff P., Woodward M., et al. Evaluation of the usability of a brief computerized cognitive screening test in older people for epidemiological studies. Neuroepidemiology.2010; 34(2):65-75.
31.
Collie A., Maruff P., Currie J.Behavioural characterization of mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24:720-733.
32.
Nunnally JOPsychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
33.
Sharp DS, Gahlinger PMRegression analysis in biological research: sample size and statistical power . Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20(6):605-610.
34.
Chow TW, Hynan LS, Lipton AMMMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(3):194-199.
35.
Nelson PT, Kryscio RJ, Jicha GA, et al. Relative preservation of MMSE scores in autopsy-proven dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology.2009;73(14):1127-1133.
