A time-resolved optical mammograph operating at 7 wavelengths (637, 683, 785, 832, 905, 916, and 975 nm) in compressed breast geometry was developed. Its clinical application was started on patients bearing malignant and benign lesions. Late gated intensity images are used to obtain information on the spatial distribution of the absorption properties of breast. Scattering images derived from the diffusion theory are also applied for lesion detection and characterization. Cancers are identified in intensity images at short wavelengths, due to the high blood content, while cysts are typically characterized by low scattering at all wavelengths. The increase (from 4 to 7) in the number of wavelengths as compared to the previous versions of the instrument aims at improving the robustness of the fitting procedures for a better estimate of tissue composition and structure and of physiological parameters. Moreover, the new wavelengths contribute to the qualitatively identify tissue composition from intensity images, and could assist lesion detection.
World Health Organisation. Breast Cancer Screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer Prevention. Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. IARC Press, Lyon (2002).
BlanksR. G., MossS. M., McGahanC. E., QuinnM. J., BabbP. J.Effect of NHS Breast Screening Programme in Mortality from Breast Cancer in England and Wales 1990–8: Comparison of Observed with Predicted Mortality. BMJ321, 665–669 (2000).
4.
KolbT. M., LichyJ., NewhouseJ. H.Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27, 825 Patient Evaluations. Radiology225, 165–175 (2002).
5.
LewinJ. M., D'OrsiC. J., HendrickR. E., MossL. J., IsaacsP. K., KarellasA., CutterG. R.Clinical Comparison of Full-field Digital Mammography and Screen-film Mammography for Detection of Breast Cancer. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.179, 671–677 (2002).
6.
SkaaneP., SkjennaldA.Screen-film Mammography Versus Full Field Digital Mammography with Softcopy Reading: Randomized Trial in a Population-based Screening Population: The Oslo II Study. Radiology232, 197–204 (2004).
7.
HyltonN.Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Opportunities to Improve Breast Cancer Management. J. Clin. Oncol.23, 1678–1684 (2005).
8.
WangL., HoP. P., LiuC., ZhangG., AlfanoR. R.Ballistic 2-D Imaging Through Scattering Wall Using an Ultrafast Kerr Gate. Science253, 769 (1991).
9.
CubedduR., PifferiA., TaroniP., TorricelliA., ValentiniG.Imaging of Optical Inhomogeneities in Highly Diffusive Media: Discrimination Between Scattering and Absorption Contributions. Appl. Phys. Lett.69, 4162–4164 (1996).
10.
TaroniP., TorricelliA., SpinelliL., PifferiA., ArpaiaF., DanesiniG, CubedduR.Time-resolved Optical Mammography Between 637 and 985 nm: Clinical Study on the Detection and Identification of Breast Lesions. Phys. Med. Biol.50, 2469–2488 (2005).
11.
GrosenickD., MoestaK. T., WabnitzH., MuckeJ., StroszczynskiC., MacdonaldR., SchlagP. M., RinnebergH.Time-domain Optical Mammography: Initial Clinical Results on Detection and Characterization of Breast Tumors. Appl. Opt.42, 3170–3186 (2003).
12.
PattersonM. S., ChanceB., WilsonB. C.Time-resolved Reflectance and Transmittance for the Noninvasive Measurement of Tissue Optical Properties. Appl. Opt.28, 2331–2336 (1989).
13.
HaskellR. C., SvasaandL. O., TsayT. T., FengT. C., McAdamsM. S., TrombergB. J.Boundary Conditions for the Diffusion Equation in Radiative Transfer. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A11, 2727–2741 (1994).
14.
MourantJ. R., FuselierT., BoyerJ., JohnsonT. M., BigioI. J.Predictions and Measurements of Scattering and Absorption Over Broad Wavelength Ranges in Tissue Phantoms. Appl. Opt.36, 949–957 (1997).
15.
SpinelliL., TorricelliA., PifferiA., TaroniP., DanesiniG. M., CubedduR.Bulk Optical Properties and Tissue Components in the Female Breast from Multi-wavelength Time-resolved Optical Mammography. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 1137–1142 (2004).
16.
PifferiA., SwartlingJ., ChikoidzeE., TorricelliA., TaroniP., BassiA., Andersson-EngelsS., CubedduR.Spectroscopic Time-resolved Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance Measurements of the Female Breast at Different Interfiber Distances. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 1143–1151 (2004).
MatcherS. J., ElwellC. E., CooperC. E., CopeM., DelpyD. T.Performance Comparison of Several Published Tissue Near-infrared Spectroscopy Algorithms. Anal. Biochem.227, 54–68 (1995).
19.
van VeenR. L. P., SterenborgH. J. C. M., PifferiA., TorricelliA., CubedduR.Determination of VIS-NIR Absorption Coefficients of Mammalian Fat, with Time-and Spatially Resolved Diffuse Reflectance and Transmission Spectroscopy, In OSA Biomedical Topical Meetings on CD-ROM, SF4. The Optical Society of America, Washington, DC (2004).
20.
LawsonC. L., HansonR. J.Solving Least Squares Problems.New York, NY: Prentice-Hall (1974).
21.
GandjbakhcheA. H., NossalR., BonnerR. F.Resolution Limits for Optical Transillumination of Abnormalities Deeply Embedded in Tissues. Med. Phys.21, 185–191 (1994).
GrosenickD., WabnitzH., MoestaK. T., MuckeJ., MöllerM., StroszczynskiC., StöbelJ., WassermannB., SchlagP. M., RinnebergH.Concentration and Oxygen Saturation of Haemoglobin of 50 Breast Tumours Determined by Time-domain Optical Mammography. Phys. Med. Biol.49, 1165–1181 (2004).
24.
HebdenJ. C., YatesT. D., GibsonA., EverdellN., ArridgeS. R., ChickenD. W., DouekM., KeshtgarM. R. S.Monitoring Recovery Following Laser Surgery of the Breast Using Optical Tomography: A Case Study. Appl. Opt.44, 1898–1904 (2005).
25.
PeraV. E., HefferE. L., SieboldH., SchützO., Heywang-KöbrunnerS., GötzL., HeinigA., FantiniS.Spatial Second-derivative Image Processing: An Application to Optical Mammography to Enhance the Detection of Breast Tumors. J. Biomed. Opt.8, 517–524 (2003).
26.
DehghaniH., PogueB. W., PoplackS. P., PaulsenK. D.Multiwavelength Three-dimensional Near-infrared Tomography of the Breast: Initial Simulation, Phantom, and Clinical Results. Appl. Opt.42, 135–145 (2003).
27.
JiangH., IftimiaN. V., XuY., EggertJ. A., FajardoL. L., KloveK. L.Near-Infrared Optical Imaging of the Breast with Model-based Reconstruction. Acad. Radiol.9, 186–194 (2002).
28.
GuX., ZhangQ., BartlettM., SchutzL., FajardoL. L., JiangH.Differentiation of Cysts from Solid Tumors in the Breast with Diffuse Optical Tomography. Acad. Radiol.11, 53–60 (2004).
29.
ChoeR., CorluA., LeeK., DurduranT., KoneckyS. D., Grosicka-KoptyraM., ArridgeS. R., CzernieckiB. J., FrakerD. L., DeMicheleA., ChanceB., RosenM. A., YodhA. G.Diffuse Optical Tomography of Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Case Study with Comparison to MRI. Med. Phys.32, 1128–1139 (2005).
30.
LiA., MillerE. L., KilmerM. E., BrukilacchioT. J., ChavesT., StottJ., ZhangQ., WuT., ChorltonM. A., MooreR. H., KopansD. B., BoasD. A.Tomographic Optical Breast Imaging Guided by Three-dimensional Mammography. Appl. Opt.42, 5181–5190 (2003).
31.
ChenN. G., HuangM., XiaH., PiaoD., CroninE., ZhuQ.Portable Near-infrared Diffusive Light Imager for Breast Cancer Detection. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 504–510 (2004).
32.
BergersG., BejaminL.Tumorigenesis and the Angiogenic Switch. Nature Rev.3, 401–410 (2003).
33.
JakubowskiD. B., CerussiA. E., BevilacquaF., ShahN., HsiangH., ButlerJ., TrombergB. J.Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Using Quantitative Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy: A Case Study. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 230–238 (2004).
34.
ChernomordikV., NossalR., GandjbakhcheA. H.Point Spread Functions of Photons in Time-resolved Transillumination Experiments Using Simple Scaling Arguments. Med. Phys.23, 1857–1861 (1996).
35.
ContiniD., LiszkaH., SassaroliA., ZaccantiG.Imaging of Highly Turbid Media by the Absorption Method. Appl. Opt.35, 2315–2324 (1996).
36.
TaroniP., DanesiniG, TorricelliA., PifferiA., SpinelliL., CubedduR.Clinical Trial of Time-resolved Scanning Optical Mammography at 4 Wavelengths Between 683 and 975 nm. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 464–473 (2004).
37.
TorricelliA., PifferiA., TaroniP., GiambattistelliE., CubedduR, In Vivo Optical Characterization of Human Tissues from 610 to 1010 nm by Time-resolved Reflectance Spectroscopy. Phys. Med. Biol.46, 2227–2237 (2001).
38.
CerussiA. E., JakubowskyD., ShahN., BevilacquaF., LanningR., BergerA. J., HsiangD., ButlerJ., HolcombeR. F., TrombergB. J.Spectroscopy Enhances the Information Content of Optical Mammography. J. Biomed. Opt.7, 60–71 (2002).
39.
PogueB. W., JiangS., DehghaniH., KogelC., SohoS., SrinivasanS., SongX., TostesonT. D., PoplackS. P., PaulsenK. D.Characterization of Hemoglobin, Water, and NIR Scattering in Breast Tissue: Analysis of Intersubject Variability and Menstrual Cycle Changes. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 541–552 (2004).
40.
BlyschakK., SimickM., JongR., LilgeL.Classification of Breast Tissue Density by Optical Transillumination Spectroscopy: Optical and Physiological Effects Governing Predictive Value. Med. Phys.31, 1398–1414 (2004).
41.
CorluA., ChoeR., DurduranT., LeeK., SchweigerM., ArridgeS. R., HillmanE. M. C., YodhA. G.Diffuse Optical Tomography with Spectral Constraints and Wavelength Optimization. Appl. Opt.44, 2082–2093 (2005).
TorricelliA., SpinelliL., PifferiA., TaroniP., CubedduR.Use of a Nonlinear Perturbation Approach for In Vivo Breast Lesion Characterization by Multi-wavelength Time-resolved Optical Mammography. Opt. Expr.11, 853–867 (2003).
44.
LiA., MillerE. L., KilmerM. E., BrukilacchioT. J., ChavesT., StottJ., ZhangQ., WuT., ChorltonM. A., MooreR. H., KopansD. B., BoasD. A.Tomographic Optical Breast Imaging Guided by Three-dimensional Mammography. Appl. Opt.42, 5181–5190 (2003).
45.
ZhuQ.Optical Tomography with Ultrasound Localization: Initial Clinical Results and Technical Challenges. TCRT4, 235–244 (2005).
46.
BuistD. S., PorterP. L., LehmanC., TaplinS. H., WhiteE.Factors Contributing to Mammography Failure in Women Aged 40–49 Years. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.96, 1432–1440 (2004).
47.
ByrneC.Studying Mammographic Density: Implications for Understanding Breast Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.89, 531–533 (1997).
