Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Tackling aversions to theory in the social sciences and humanities, this piece unpacks the bad faiths and myopic commentary directed at non-positivist and conceptually driven texts. Drawing on critiques and defenses mounted in the 1980s, 1990s, and the present—alongside exchanges inside and outside the classroom—it mounts an unapologetic defense of theory centering the skillful labors that allow us to compare, argue, distill, critique, abandon, rework, and interpret phenomena. Zeroing in on the empirical and theoretical moves always at play in ethnography, it argues on behalf of the value of allowing lines of thought to carry us obliquely along as much as explicate things. Some closing injunctions around foregrounding what is exciting and nourishing about theory and the pleasures and possibilities of adopting an experimental ethos toward it are put forward.

Keywords

theory social sciences humanities ethnography concept work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballestero

(2015). Theory as parallax and provocation. In Boyer

Faubion

J. D.

Marcus

G. E.

(Eds.), Theory can be more than it used to be: Learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition (pp. 171–180). Cornell University Press.

Ballestero

Winthereik

B. R.

(Eds.) (2021). Experimenting with ethnography: A companion to analysis. Duke University Press.

Benedicto

(2014). Under bright lights: Gay Manila and the global scene. University of Minnesota Press.

Bhabha

H. K.

(1989). The commitment to theory. In Pines

Willemen

(Eds.), Questions of third cinema (pp. 111–132). BFI Publishing.

Bourdieu

(1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

(1999). The new global vulgate. The Baffler, 12, 69–78.

Christian

(1988). The race for theory. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 67–79.

De León

. (2015). The land of open graves: Living and dying on the migrant trail. University of California Press.

Ellasante

I. K.

(2020). Dear trans studies, can you do love? TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 7(3), 421–426.

10.

Foucault

Deleuze

(1977). Intellectuals and power. In Bouchard

D. F.

(Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 205–217). Cornell University Press.

11.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.

12.

Healy

(2017). Fuck nuance. Sociological Theory, 35(2), 118–127.

13.

Heywood

(2018). Making difference: Queer activism and anthropological theory. Current Anthropology, 59(3), 314–331.

14.

Knauft

B. M.

(2006). Anthropology in the middle. Anthropological Theory, 6(4), 407–430.

15.

Scheper-Hughes

(1992). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. University of California Press.

16.

Stein

J. A.

(2019). Avidly reads theory. New York University Press.

The Aversion to Theory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References