University leaders frequently release statements following social, racial, and/or political events that affect the university population. Using Critical Discourse Analysis and Intersectional Analysis, this study offers a comparative exploration of institutional responses to two central and conflicting events that took place in the final year of the Trump administration: the murder of George Floyd in May 2020 and the insurrection at the Capitol in January 2021. In comparing how institutions addressed both events, we found that the statements issued in 2020 were what we defined as “transformational” while the 2021 statements engaged less with systemic injustice. This analysis provides a useful guideline for future studies to address the responses of administrators to national events that have had polarizing or psychological impacts on the higher education community and offers support for institutional leaders who wish to put their holistic selves in their writing to serve the institution’s more progressive diversity, equity, and inclusion goals.
ColeE. R. (2020). The campus color line: College presidents and the struggle for Black freedom. Princeton University Press.
9.
ColeE. R.HarperS. R. (2017). Race and rhetoric: An analysis of college presidents’ statements on campus racial incidents. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000044
10.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley.
11.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1300.
12.
DavisS.HarrisJ. C. (2016). But we didn’t mean it like that: A Critical Race Analysis of campus responses to racial incidents. Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs, 2(1), 24–30.
13.
DebordG. (1977). Society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.
14.
DonnorJ. K. (2020). Understanding white racial sovereignty: Doing research on race and inequality in the Trump era (and beyond). International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(2), 285–292.
15.
EdwardsE. B.EspositoJ. (2019). Intersectional analysis as a method to analyze popular culture: Clarity in the matrix. Routledge.
16.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217.
17.
FaircloughN.FaircloughI. (2018). A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(2), 169–185.
FigueroaN.VaughtS. (2019). Talk is cheap: The prospects and problems with campus conversations on race. In HeaggansR.FriersonH. T. (Eds.), Diversity and triumphs of navigating the terrain of academe: International perspectives (pp. 7–23). Emerald.
GarciaC. E.ArnbergB.WeiseJ.WinbornM. (2020). Institutional responses to events challenging campus climates: Examining the power in language. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(4), 345–354.
HancockA. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press.
26.
HarperS. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29.
27.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791.
28.
HypoliteL. I.StewartA. M. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of institutional responses to the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14, 1–11.
KezarA.EckelP. (2008). Advancing diversity agendas on campus: Examining transactional and transformational presidential leadership styles. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120802317891
31.
LesterN. L.LochmillerC. R.GabrielR. (2016). Locating and applying Critical Discourse Analysis within education policy: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(102), 1–15.
32.
LiuW. M. (2017). White male power and privilege: The relationship between White supremacy and social class. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(4), 349–358.
SquireD. (2017). The vacuous rhetoric of diversity: Exploring how institutional responses to national racial incidences effect faculty of color perceptions of university commitment to diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(8), 728–745.
40.
SquireD.NicolazzoN.PerezR. J. (2019). Institutional response as non-performative: What university communications (don’t) say about movements toward justice. The Review of Higher Education, 42(Suppl.), 109–133.
TroppL. R.UluǧӦ. M. (2019). Are white women showing up for social justice? Intergroup contact, closeness to people targeted by prejudice, and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(3), 335–347.
ZinnM. B. (1979). Field research in minority communities: Ethical, methodological and political observations by an Insider. Social Problems, 27(2), 209–219.
