This article argues that #MeToo posts are transgressive and can be understood as a case of confessional discourse that has the potential to empower women around the world rather than inspiring shame. Due to its public nature, #MeToo also challenges existing frameworks for understanding sexual relationships in the United States. This critical discourse analysis of the response to the #MeToo movement over 9 months (2017–2018) on the Reddit community AskReddit surfaced fears about how the movement is redefining normal sexual behavior. By inventorying the knowledge claims produced across four question and answer comment threads, important shifts in subject positions and discursive frames show that under the guise of inclusive rhetoric and expert discourse, many Reddit respondents fear their past behavior will be reconstituted as abusive. Rape myths also appeared in the discourse as a backlash against the #MeToo movement.
Ardovini-BrookerJ.Caringella-MacDonaldS. (2002).
Media attributions of blame and sympathy in ten rape cases.The Justice Professional,
15(1), 3–18. doi:10.1080/08884310212826
BakhtinM. (1935/2004). Discourse in the novel. In RivkinJ.RyanM. (Eds.), Literary theory: An anthology(2nd ed., pp. 674–685).
Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishing.
6.
BenedictH. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
FaircloughN. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138).
London, England:
Sage Publications.
15.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality.
New York, NY:
Pantheon Books.
16.
GeeJ. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
JorgensenD. L. (2015). Participant observation. In ScottR. A.BuchmannM. C. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–15).
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
LazarM. M. (2014). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Relevance for current gender and language research. In EhrlichS.MeyerhoffM.HolmesJ. (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed., pp. 180–200).
West Sussex, England:
Wiley Blackwell.
22.
MassanariA. (2017).
#Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society,
19(3), 329–346. doi:10.1177%2F1461444815608807
23.
MautnerG. (2005).
Time to get wired: Using web-based corpora in critical discourse analysis.Discourse & Society,
16(6), 809–828. doi:10.1177%2F0957926505056661
24.
MillsS. (1997). Discourse: The new critical idiom.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
PenningtonR.BirthiselJ. (2016).
When new media makes news: Framing technology and sexual assault in the Steubenville rape case.New Media & Society,
18(11), 2435–2451. doi:10.1177%2F1461444815612407
29.
SantanaA. D. (2014).
Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards.Journalism Practice,
8(1), 18–33. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
TiradoF.GalvezA. (2007).
Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research,
8(2), Art. 31. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702317
32.
TornbergA.TornbergP. (2016).
Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. Discourse, Context & Media,
13(B), 132–142. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.003
WodakR. (2001). What CDA is about – A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13).
London, England:
Sage Publications.
35.
WoodL. A.RennieH. (1994).
Formulating rape: The discursive construction of victims and villains.Discourse & Society,
5(1), 125–148. doi:10.1177%2F0957926594005001006
