The article is a palimpsest created as part of the project of collective autoethnographic writing. Its multiple forms formed the basis for the community and the intensification of friendly writing. After the assemblies, there were remnants. The remnants of practices from which one could crack meanings―but these are not the most important ones. This peculiar collection of artifacts is presented with a frail hope that the remnants still contain a messianic promise which will spread like plague. Maybe the text will revive in your hands—by reading it, you will write another version with our ghosts.
BadleyG. F. (2020). Why and how academics write. Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 247-256. doi:10.1177/1077800418810722
2.
BallS. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215-228.
3.
BallS. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60, 17-28.
BaumanT.JendzaJ. (2016). Ciemne i jasne metafory dialogowania w uniwersytecie [Dark and bright metaphors of dialogue at university]. Studia i badania naukowe, 10, 107-123.
6.
BaumanZ. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7.
BlockA. A. (2017). Study as scared. In RuitenbergC. W. (Ed.), Reconceptualizing study in educational discourse and practice (pp. 84-96). London, England: Routledge.
8.
BochnerA. P. (2000). Criteria against ourselves. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 266-272.
9.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London, England: Routledge.
10.
ButlerJ. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
ChutorańskiM.SzwabowskiO. (2018). Parametryzacja, humanistyka i los mieszkańców Rapa Nui [Parametrization, The Humanities, and the Fate of the People from Rapa Nui]. Rocznik Lubuski, 44(2), 145-163.
FosterE. (2017). Academic labor in the age of anxiety: Autoethnography matters. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17, 320-326.
22.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
23.
FrommE. (1997). To have or to be?New York, NY: Continuum.
24.
GaleK. (2016). Writing minor literature: Working with flows, intensities and the welcome of the unknown. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 301-308.
25.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2017). Working at the wonder: Collaborative writing as method of inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 355-364.
26.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2019). Autoethnography and activism: Movement, intensity, and potential. Qualitative Inquiry, 25, 566-568. doi:10.1177/1077800418800754
27.
GirouxH. A. (2011). Zombie politics and culture in the age of casino capitalism. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
28.
GirouxH. A. (2013). Occupy colleges now: Students as the new public intellectuals. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 150-153.
29.
GrantA.ShortP. N.TurnerL. (2013). Introduction: Storying life and lives. In ShortN. P.TurnerL.GrantA. (Eds.), Contemporary British autoethnography (pp. 1-16). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
30.
GuattariF. (2006). The anti-Oedipus papers (GotmanK., Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
31.
GuttormH. E. (2012). Becoming-(a)-paper, or an article undone: (Post-)knowing and writing (again), nomadic and so messy. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 595-605.
32.
GurevitchZ. (2000). The serious play of writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 3-7.
33.
HeinS. F. (2017). Deleuze’s new image of thought: Challenging the dogmatic image of thought in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 656-665.
34.
HendersonL.HonanE.LochS. (2016). The production of the academicwritingmachine. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 7(2), 4-18.
35.
HensonD. F. (2017). Fragments and fictions: An autoethnography of past and possibility. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 222-224.
36.
HerrmannA. F. (2014). Ghosts, vampires, zombies, and us: The undead as autoethnographic bridges. International Review of Qualitative Research, 7, 327-341.
37.
JovanovicS. (2017). Speaking back to the neoliberal agenda for higher education. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17, 327-332.
38.
KwiekM.AntonowiczD.BrdulakJ.HulickaM.JędrzejewskiT.KowalskiR.Wolszczak-DerlaczJ. (2015). Projekt założeń do ustawy Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym. Poznań, Poland: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza.
39.
LapadatJ. C. (2018). The problem of words in the eighth moment. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 18, 175-176.
40.
LaskowskiP. (2011). Maszyny wojenne. Georges Sorel i strategie radykalnej filozofii politycznej [War machines: Georges Sorel and strategies of radical political philosophy]. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Czarna Owca.
41.
LewisT. E. (2013). On study: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality. New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
MassumiB. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
MazzeiL. A. (2016). Voice without a subject. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 151-161.
45.
MoeM.ReinertsenA. B. (2019). Poeticalization and storying; www.mmm.com. Qualitative Inquiry, 25, 637-640. doi:10.1177/1077800418806613
46.
MorrisD. (2012). Pedagogy in catastrophic times: Giroux and the tasks of critical public intellectuals. Policy Futures in Education, 10, 647-664.
47.
PeliasR. J. (2017). Still here, writing, trying to be a part of the conversation. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17, 364-365.
48.
PławskiM.SzwabowskiO.SzczepaniakC.WężniejewskaP. (2018). Friendly writing as non-inquiry: The problems of collective autoethnographic writing about collective autoethnographic writing. Qualitative Inqiury, doi: 1077800418809134.
49.
PoulosC. N. (2017). Under pressure. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17, 308-315.
50.
RichardsonL. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923-949) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
RudnickiC. (2016). Protokół z eksperymentu (JaksenderA. Z.JaksenderK. M., Trans.). In DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (Eds.), Kafka Ku literaturze mniejszej [Kafka. Toward a minor literature] (pp. 7-32). Kraków, Poland: Wydawnictwo Eperons-Ostrogi.
52.
RutkowiakJ. (2010). O tęsknocie do uniwersyteckiej przyjaźni: przemiany w uniwersytecie, przemiany w jego ludziach [About yearning for university friendship: A change in the university, a change in its people]. Teraźniejszość—Człowiek—Edukacja, 51(3), 53-65.
53.
SakellariadisA.ChromyS.MartinV.SpeedyJ.TraharS.WilliamsS.WilsonS. (2008). Friend and foe? Technology in a collaborative writing group. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 1205-1222.
54.
SclaterS. D. (2003). The arts and narrative research—Art as inquiry: An epilogue. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 621-624.
55.
ScottD. (2014). Gilbert Simondon’s psychic and collective individuation: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
SimondonG. (1992). The genesis of the individual (M. Cohen & S. Kwinter, Trans.). In CraryJ.KwinterS. (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 297-319). New York, NY: Zone Books.
59.
SmithB. (2013). Artificial persons and the academy: A story. In ShortN. P.TurnerL.GrantA. (Eds.), Contemporary British autoethnography (pp. 187-202). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
60.
SpeedyJ. (2005). Writing as inquiry: Some ideas, practices, opportunities and constraints. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5, 63-64.
61.
SpeedyJ. (2012). Collaborative writing and ethical know-how: Movements within the space around scholarship, the academy and the social research imaginary. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 349-356.
62.
SpinozaB. (2002). Ethics (ShirleyS., Trans.). In MorganM. L. (Ed.), Complete works (pp. 213-384). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
63.
SzwabowskiO. (2016). Jak trafiłem na terapię. Z życia w obozie z kości słoniowej [How I came to therapy. Life in the camp made of ivory]. Parezja, 6, 148-156.
64.
SzwabowskiO.SzczepaniakC.PławskiM.WężniejewskaP. (2018). Friendly-writing as non-inquiry. The problems of collective autoethnographic writing about collective autoethnographic writing. Qualitative Inquiry, doi: 10.1177/1077800418809134
65.
SzadkowskiK. (2015). Uniwersytet jako dobro wspólne. Podstawy krytycznych badan nad szkolnictwem wyższym [University as the commons. The basics of critical research on higher education]. Warszawa, Poland: PWN.
66.
ValentimI. V. L. (2017). Academic pimping: Is anyone afraid of researching academic relationships? In Pensoneau-ConwayS. L.AdamsT. E.BolenD. M. (Eds.), Doing autoethnography (pp. 173-185). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
67.
WłodarczykR. (2016). Ideologia, teoria, edukacja. Myśl Ericha Fromma jako inspiracja dla pedagogiki współczesnej [Ideology, theory, education. The thought of Erich Form as an inspiration for contemporary pedagogy]. Kraków, Poland: Impuls.
68.
WernerK. (2019). In praise, in praise of the radio autoethnography: A radio collage. Qualitative Inquiry, 25, 561-562. doi:10.1177/1077800418801374
