In this article, I present an autoethnographic reflection on a subject I have studied for several years. It concerns the relationship that people have with certain rules, especially traffic laws. Through the study of a specific case in Argentina, I relate some personal experiences and feelings associated with them. I also reflect on my position as a researcher as well as on my mistakes and assumptions. In addition, the voices of some participants in the study are brought to the text.
ConradD. (2008). Performance ethnography. In GivenL. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 608-612). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
DenzinN. (2006). Analytic autoethnography, or Déjà Vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 419-428.
3.
DenzinN. (2013). Interpretive autoethnography. In JonesS. H.AdamsT.CarolynE. (Eds.), Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 123-142). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
4.
EllisC. (2009). Fighting Back or Moving On: An autoethnographic response to critics. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2(3). 371-378
5.
EllisC. (2013). Carrying the Torch of Autoethnography. In JonesS. H.AdamsT.CarolynE. (Eds.), Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 9-12). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
6.
EllisC.BochnerA. (2003). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity. Researcher as Subject. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 199-258). Walnut Creek, California: Sage.
7.
FeliuJ. (2007). Nuevas formas literarias para las ciencias sociales: el caso de la Autoetnografía [New Litterary Forms for Social Sciences: Autoethnography]. Athenea Digital, 12, 262-271.
8.
GoodallH. L. (2004). Deep play in a pocket rally: A Sunday among the Ferraristi of long island. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 731-766.
9.
Holman JonesS. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 763-791). London, England: Sage.
10.
Holman JonesS.AdamsT.EllisC. (2013). Handbook of autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
11.
MerlinoA. (2009). Investigación Cualitativa en Ciencias Sociales. Temas, Problemas y Aplicaciones [Qualitative Research in Social Sciences. Subjects, Problems and Aplications]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Cengage Learning.
12.
MerlinoA. (2010). De la argumentación a los modelos de acción/situación en el discurso sobre el tráfico vehicular en Argentina [From Argumentation to Action/Situation Models in Discourses about Traffic in Argentina]. Discurso y sociedad, 4, 257-293.
13.
MerlinoA. (2012a). Análisis de datos cualitativos: hacia un modelo psicosociológico de análisis del discurso [Analysis of Qualitative Data: Towards a Psycho-sociological Model of Discourse Analysis]. In Arroyo MenéndezM.SabadaI. (Eds.), Metodología de la investigación social, innovaciones y aplicaciones (pp. 19-47). Madrid, Spain: Síntesis.
14.
MerlinoA. (2012b). Investigación cualitativa y análisis del discurso [Qualitative Research and Discourse Analysis]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Biblos.
15.
MerlinoA.MartinezA.EscanesG. (2011). Representaciones sociales de la masculinidad y agresividad en el tránsito. La ira al conducir en Argentina [Social Representations of Masculinity and Agressiveness in Traffic. Anger while Driving in Argentina]. Revista Barbaroi, 35, 257-293.
16.
PackerJ. (2008). Mobility without Mayhem: Safety, cars and citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
PrestonB. (2013, August13). The rich drive differently, a study suggests. New York Times, p. B2.
SpryT. (2011). Performative autoethnography. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 497-511). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
TedlockB. (2005). The observation of participation and the emergence of public ethnography. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 467-481). London, England: Sage.
