Given the inequitable opportunities and marginalizing experiences for undocumented Students of Color, this manuscript builds on the work of previous Scholars of Color to challenge the traditional roles of researchers during the data collection process. Guided by critical race theory, nepantleras, and Chicana feminist epistemology, the article proposes a critical race nepantlera methodology (CRNM). CRNM entails a reflexive and reciprocal approach that guides the research process and is rooted in anti-colonial social justice actions. Two exemplars from previous studies elaborate on CRNM and the relevance to critically conscious researchers, particularly when conducting studies with undocumented Students of Color.
AbsolonK. (2010). Indigenous wholistic theory: A knowledge set for practice. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 5(2), 74-87.
2.
Acevedo-GilN. (2014). Building a college-going climate: College aspirations, choices, integrations and transitions of Latina/o high school students (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
3.
Acevedo-GilN. (2018). New Juan crow education as a context for institutional microaggressions: Latina/o/x students maintaining college aspirations. Urban Education, 0042085918805152.
4.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Press.
5.
AnzaldúaG. (2002). Now let us shift: Conocimiento…The path of inner work, public acts. In AnzaldúaG.KeatingA. (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540-578). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BarnesR. (1990). Race consciousness: The thematic content of racial distinctiveness in critical race scholarship. Harvard Law Review, 103, 1864-1871.
CalderónD.Delgado BernalD.HuberL. P.MalagónM.VélezV. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 513-539.
9.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
10.
CrenshawK. W. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1331-1387.
11.
Davidson AvilesR. M.GuerreroM. P.Barajas HowarthH.ThomasG. (1999). Perceptions of Chicano/Latino students who have dropped out of school. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77, 465-473.
12.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
13.
Delgado BernalD. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555-583.
14.
Delgado-GaitanC.TruebaH. (1991). Crossing cultural borders: Education for immigrant families in America. Abingdon, UK: Falmer Press.
15.
ElenesA. C. (2010). Transforming borders: Chicana/o popular culture and pedagogy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
16.
FigueroaJ. L.SánchezP. (2008). Technique, art, or cultural practice? Ethnic epistemology in Latino qualitative studies. In FongT. (Ed.), Ethnic studies research: Approaches and perspectives (pp. 143-177). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
17.
FineM. (1994). Working the hyphens. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Flores CarmonaJ. (2010). Transgenerational educación: Latina mother’s everyday pedagogies of cultural citizenship in Salt Lake City, Utah (Doctoral dissertation). University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
19.
Flores CarmonaJ. (2014). Cutting out their tongues: Mujeres’ testimonios and the Malintzin researcher. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies, 6, 113-124.
20.
FriereP. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed: New revised 20th anniversary edition. London, England: Penguin.
21.
GándaraP. C.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GonzalesR. G.ChavezL. R.BoehmD. A.BrettellC. B.CoutinS. B.IndaJ. X.. . . StephenL. (2012). “Awakening to a nightmare” abjectivity and illegality in the lives of undocumented 1.5-generation Latino immigrants in the United States. Current Anthropology, 53, 255-281.
23.
GubaE.LincolnY. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-188, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
HoogheM.DassonnevilleR. (2018). Explaining the Trump vote: The effect of racist resentment and anti-immigrant sentiments. Political Science & Politics, 51, 528-534.
25.
HydeC. (1986). Experiences of women activists: Implications for community organizing theory and practice. Journal Sociology & Social Welfare, 13, 545-562.
26.
KanstroomD. (2007). Deportation nation: Outsiders in American history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
KasprisinL. (2013). The school-to-prison pipeline: A civil rights and a civil liberty issue. Journal of Educational Controversy, 7(1), Article 1.
28.
KeatingA. (2006). From borderlands and new mestizas to nepantlas and nepantleras: Anzaldúan theories for social change. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-knowledge, 4(3), Article 3.
29.
KellyL.BurtonS.ReganL. (1994). Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In MaynardM.PurvisJ. (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 27-48). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
30.
KohliR. (2008). Breaking the cycle of racism in the classroom: Critical race reflections from future teachers of color. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 177-188.
31.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47-68.
32.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within/in the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
LordeA. (1988). A burst of light: Essays. New York, NY: Firebrand.
35.
MaiterS.SimichL.JacobsonN.WiseJ. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 6, 305-325.
36.
MartinezM. D. (2003). Missing in action: Reconstructing hope and possibility among Latino students placed at risk. Journal of Latinos and Education, 2, 13-21.
37.
MignoloW. (2000). Introduction: From cross-genealogies and subaltern knowledges to nepantla. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(1), 1-8.
38.
MuñozS. M.MaldonadoM. M. (2012). Counterstories of college persistence by undocumented Mexicana students: Navigating race, class, gender, and legal status. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25, 293-315.
39.
Negrón-GonzalesG. (2017). Constrained inclusion: Access and persistence among undocumented community college students in California’s Central Valley. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 105-122.
40.
NienhusserH. K.VegaB. E.Saavedra CarquinM. C. (2016). Undocumented students’ experiences with microaggressions during their college choice process. Teachers College Record, 118(2), 1-33.
41.
PatelL. (2015). Deservingness: Challenging coloniality in education and migration scholarship. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 9(3), 11-21.
42.
PerezP. A. (2010). College choice process of Latino undocumented students: Implications for recruitment and retention. Journal of College Admission, 206, 21-25.
43.
PerezW.EspinozaR.RamosK.CoronadoH. M.CortesR. (2009). Academic resilience among undocumented Latino students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31, 149-181.
44.
Pérez HuberL. P.LopezC. B.MalagonM. C.VelezV.SolorzanoD. G. (2008). Getting beyond the “symptom,” acknowledging the “disease”: Theorizing racist nativism. Contemporary Justice Review, 11, 39-51.
45.
PernaL. W. (November, 2015). Throwing down the gauntlet: Ten ways to ensure that our research continues to matter. Presidential address at the National Conference of the Association for the Studies of Higher Education, Denver, CO. Retrieved from https://vimeopro.com/vc1/ashe-2015
46.
PernaL. W. (2016). Throwing down the gauntlet: Ten ways to ensure that higher education research continues to matter. The Review of Higher Education, 39, 319-338.
47.
RiosV. M.GaliciaM. G. (2014). Smoking guns or smoke & mirrors? Schools and the policing of Latino boys. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 7(3), 54-66.
48.
RogersJ.FanelliS.FreelonR.MedinaD.BertrandM.Del RazoM. (2010). Educational opportunities in hard times: The impact of the economic crisis on public schools and working families (California Educational Opportunity Report). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access UC All Campus Consortium on Research for Diversity.
49.
RomanoO. (1970). Social science, objectivity, and the Chicanos. El Grito, 4(1), 4-16.
50.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
51.
SolórzanoD. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 121-136.
52.
StovallD. O. (2016). Born out of struggle: Critical race theory, school creation, and the politics of interruption. New York: State University of New York Press.
53.
StrandbergE. L.OvhedI.BorgquistL.WilhelmssonS. (2007). The perceived meaning of a (w)holistic view among general practitioners and district nurses in Swedish primary care: A qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 8(1), 1-8.
54.
Suárez-OrozcoC.KatsiaficasD.BirchallO.AlcantarC. M.HernandezE.GarciaY.. . . TeranishiR. T. (2015). Undocumented undergraduates on college campuses: Understanding their challenges and assets and what it takes to make an undocufriendly campus. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 427-463.
Vela-GudeL.CavazosJ.JohnsonM.FieldingC.CavazosA.CamposL.RodriguezI. (2009). “My counselors were never there”: Perceptions from Latino college students. Professional School Counseling, 12, 272-279.
57.
VillenasS. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711-732.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 8, 69-91.
60.
ZarateM. E.GallimoreR. (2005). Gender differences in factors leading to college enrollment: A longitudinal analysis of Latina and Latino students. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 383-408.
