In this article, the authors describe critical co-constructed autoethnography as a methodology steeped in critical theory, critical pedagogy and critical race theory. It provides a way for collaborating activist researchers to reflect on the tempo, uncertainty, and complexity of research relationships that cross boundaries into more personal spaces such as friendships. Further, critical co-constructed authoethnography creates spaces for collaborating researchers to work across differences.
AronowitzS.GirouxH. (1985). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
2.
BochnerA. P. (1997). It’s about time: Narrative and the divided self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 418-438.
3.
BochnerA. P.EllisC. (1992). Personal narrative as a social approach to interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 2(2), 165-172.
4.
BochnerA. P.EllisC. (1995). Telling and living: Narrative co-construction and the practices of interpersonal relationships. In Leeds-HurwitzW. (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 201-213). New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In KarabelJ.HalseyA. (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 473-486). New York, NY: Oxford University.
6.
BurdellP.SwadnerB. (1999). Critical personal narrative and autoethnography in education: Reflections on a genre. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 21-26.
7.
CannC.DeMeulenaereE. (2010). Forged in the crucibles of difference: Building discordant communities. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 7(1), 41-53.
8.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CollinsP. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
DelgadoR. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411-2441.
11.
DeMeulenaereE. (2009). Fluid identities: Black students negotiating the transformation of their academic identities and school performances. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 2(1), 30-48.
12.
DufresneJ. (2003). The lie that tells a truth: A guide to writing fiction. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
13.
DyrnessA. (2008). Research for change versus research as change: Lessons from a Mujerista participatory research team. Anthropology & Education, 39(1), 23-44.
14.
EllisC.BochnerA. P. (1992). Telling and performing personal stories: The constraints of choice in abortion. In EllisC.FlahertyM. (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 79-101). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
15.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
16.
EllisC. (2009). Constructing and reconstructing “the constraints of choice in abortion”. In Revision: Autoethnographic reflections on life and work (pp. 195-226). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
17.
EllisC.BergerL. (2001). Their story/my story/our story: Including the researcher’s experience in interview research. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), The handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 849-875). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
FreireP. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New rev. 20th-anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1970)
19.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (HoareQ.SmithG. N., Trans.). New York, NY: International Publishers.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
LapadatJ. (2009). Writing our way into shared understanding. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 955-979.
23.
LawrenceC. (1995). The word and the river: Pedagogy as scholarship as struggle. In CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York, NY: New Press.
24.
NygreenK. (2009/2010). Critical dilemmas in PAR: Toward a new theory of engaged research for social change. Social Justice, 36(4), 14-35.
25.
PeliasR. (2002). For father and son: An ethnodrama with no catharsis. In EllisC.BochnerA. P. (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 35-43). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
26.
PeliasR. (2003). The academic tourist: An autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 369-373.
27.
SolórzanoD.YossoT. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23-44.
28.
SolórzanoD.YossoT. (2005). Maintaining social justice hopes within academic realities: A Freirean approach to critical race/LatCrit pedagogy. In LeonardoZ. (Ed.), Critical pedagogy and race (pp. 69-92). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
StovallD. (2006). Where the rubber hits the road: CRT goes to high school. In DixsonA.RousseauC. (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song. (pp. 231-240) New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
SuJ. (2000). Making the invisible visible: The garment industry’s dirty laundry. In DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 607-613). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
31.
Tillmann-HealyL. (2003). Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 729-749.
32.
YamamotoE. (1997). Critical race praxis: Race theory and political lawyering practice in post-Civil Rights America. Michigan Law Review, 95, 821-900.
