Abu-LughodL. (1991). Writing against culture. In FoxR. G. (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137-154). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
2.
Abu-LughodL. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
AsadA. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
AsadA. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7.
CastañedaQ. E. (2006). The invisible theatre of ethnography: Performative principles of fieldwork. Anthropological Quarterly, 79, 75-104.
8.
CavareroA. (2005). For more than one voice: Toward a philosophy of vocal expression. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
ChakrabartyD. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
ClarkeA. E.FrieseC.WashburnR. (2015). Introducing situational analysis. In ClarkeA. E.FrieseC.WashburnR. (Eds.), Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory (pp. 11-75). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
11.
CliffordJ. (1997). Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
ConquergoodD. (2013). Cultural struggles: Performance, ethnography, praxis (JohnsonP., Ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
CrapanzanoV. (2004). Imaginative horizons: An essay in literary-philosophical anthropology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
DelamontS. (2002). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls, and perspectives (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
16.
DeloriaV.Jr. (1988). Custer died for your sins: An Indian manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. (Original work published 1969)
17.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.). (2008). SAGE research handbooks: Handbook of critical indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
DirksN. (2001). The crimes of colonialism: Anthropology and the textualization of India. In PelsP.SalemnikO. (Eds.), Colonial subjects: Essays on the practical history of anthropology (pp. 153-180). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
ElliotD.CulhaneD. (Eds.). (2017). A different kind of ethnography: Imaginative practices and creative methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
20.
EricksonF. (2018). A history of qualitative inquiry in social and educational research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 36-65). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
21.
FabianJ. (1983). Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
FabianJ.de RooijV. (2008). Ethnography. In BennettT.FrowJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of cultural analysis(pp. 613-631). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
FortunK. (2010). Of writing culture, 2020 foreword to the 25th anniversary edition. In CliffordJ.MarcusG. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. vii-x).
24.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Interviews and other writings 1972-1977.
25.
GeertzC. (1988). Works and lives: An anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
IngoldT. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography!HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4, 383-395.
31.
IrvingA. (2011). Strange distance: Towards an anthropology of interior dialogue. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 25, 22-44.
32.
JacksonB. (1987). Fieldwork. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
KohnE. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
KovachM. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Torronto Press.
35.
LassiterL. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
MadisonD. S. (2006). “rethinking ethnography.” In MadisonD. S.HameraJ. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of performance studies (pp. 347-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
MadisonD. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
38.
MagnatV. (2011). Conducting embodied research at the intersection of performance studies, experimental ethnography and Indigenous methodologies. Anthropologica, 53(2): 213-227.
39.
MalkkiL. H. (2007). Tradition and improvisation in ethnographic field research. In CerwonkaA.MalkkiL. H. (Eds.), Improvising theory: Process and temporality in ethnographic fieldwork (pp. 162-187). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
40.
MarcusG. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
41.
MarcusG. E. (2000). Para-sites: A casebook against cynical reason. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
42.
McEachernC. (1998). A mutual interest? Ethnography in anthropology and cultural studies. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 9, 251-264.
43.
McLeanS. (2013). All the difference in the world: Liminality, montage, and the re-invention of comparative anthropology. In Guer-ZeevI. (Ed.), Transcultural montage (pp.58-75). New York, NY: Berghahn.
44.
MorrisR. (2010). Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
45.
MudimbeV. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy, and the order of knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
46.
OngW. J. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1982)
47.
PawluchD.ShaffirW.MiallC. (2005). Doing ethnography: Studying everyday life. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto Scholars’ Press.
48.
PérezE. (1999). The decolonial imaginary. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
49.
PowdermakerH. (1966). Stranger and friend: The way of an anthropologist. New York: W. W. Norton.
50.
RabinowP.MarcusG. E.FaubionJ. D.ReesT. (2008). Designs for an anthropology of the contemporary. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
51.
RiberoR. L.EscobarA. (2006). World anthropologies: Disciplinary transformations within systems of power. New York, NY: Berg Press.
SaidE.W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
54.
SalazarJ. F.PinkS.IrvingA.SjöbergJ. (Eds.). (2017). Anthropologies and Futures: Researching Emerging and Uncertain Worlds. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, Inc.
55.
SchensulJ. J.SternG. (1985). Collaborative research and social action. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 133-138.
56.
SnowD. (1999). Assessing the ways in which qualitative/ethnographic research contributes to social psychology: Introduction to special issues. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 97-100.
57.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
58.
StewartK. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
59.
StewartK. (2008). Weak theory in an unfinished world. Journal of Folklore Research, 45, 71-82.
60.
StolerA. L. (2002). Carnal knowledge and imperial power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
TaussigM. (2011). I swear I saw this: Drawings in fieldwork notebooks, namely my own. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
ThomaidisK. (2014). The revocalization of logos? Thinking, doing and disseminating voice. Studies in Musical Theatre, 8, 177-187.
64.
ThomasJ. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65.
TsingA. L. (2004). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous people (2nd ed.). London: Zed.
67.
TurnerB. L. (2002). Contested identities: Human-environment geography and disciplinary implications in a restructuring academy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 52-74.
68.
Van LoonJ. (2001). Ethnography: A critical turn in cultural studies. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 3-19). London, England: Sage.
69.
ViveirosdeCastroE. (2015). The relative native: Essays on Indigenous conceptual worlds. London, England: HAU Books.
70.
WaxR. (1971). Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
WidlokT. (2009). Bringing ethnography home? Costs and benefits of methodological traffic across disciplines. In MelhuusM.MitchellJ. P.WulffH. (Eds.), Ethnographic practice in the present (pp. 42-55). New York, NY: Berghahn.
72.
WillisP.TrondmannM. (2002). Manifesto for ethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 2, 394-402.
73.
WolcottH. F. (2004). The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
74.
YoungbloodD. (2007). Interdisciplinary studies and the bridging disciplines: A matter of process. Journal of Research Practice, 3(2). Article 18.
75.
YoungbloodD. (2007). Interdisciplinary studies and the bridging disciplines: A matter of process. Journal of Research Practice, 3(2). Article 18.