The author of this essay activates Bronwyn Davies’s conceptualization of listening as usual and listening emergently, along with Deleuze’s imaginary for ontology, as a means to enter into composition with children’s being and becoming in drawing. In doing so, the author argues for a concept and practice of listening that resonates with the entangled and complicated existence it has in our lives, an existence that is, like drawing, a truly precarious and teetering materiality.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
BennettJ. (2001). The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossing, and ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BoundasC. V. (1991). Deleuze, empiricism, and the struggle for subjectivity. In DeleuzeG. (Ed.), Empiricism and subjectivity: An essay on Hume’s theory of human nature (pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
CloughP. T. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 43-61.
CooleD.FrostS. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
DaviesB. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tails: Preschool children and gender. Cresskil, NJ: Hampton Press.
8.
DaviesB. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Foucault (HandS.BovéP., Trans.). Minneaplolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1986)
10.
DeleuzeG. (1990). The logic of sense (BoundasC. V., Ed. & LesterM., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969)
11.
DeleuzeG. (1991). Empiricism and subjectivity: An essay on Hume’s theory of human nature (BoundasC. V., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1953)
12.
DeleuzeG. (1991). Empiricism and subjectivity: An essay on Hume’s theory of human nature (BoundasC. V., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
13.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.BurchellG., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
16.
DeleuzeG.ParnetC. (2007). Dialogues II (TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)
17.
DysonA. H. (1986). Transitions and tensions: Interrelationships between the drawing, talking, and dictating of young children. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 379-409.
18.
HaydenP. (1995). From relations to practice in the empiricism of Gilles Deleuze. Man and World, 28, 283-302.
19.
IvashkevichO. (2009). Children’s drawing as a sociocultural practice: Remaking gender and popular culture. Studies in Art Education, 51, 50-63.
20.
KnightL. (2013). Not as it seems: Using Deleuzian concepts of the imaginary to rethink children’s drawing. Global Studies of Childhood, 3, 254-264.
21.
LeedsJ. A. (1989). A history of attitudes toward children’s art. Studies in Art Education, 30, 93-103.
22.
LowenfeldV. (1947). Creative and mental growth: A textbook on art education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
23.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affet, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
OlssonL. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
PascaleC.-M. (2011). Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
26.
PattonP. (2000). Deleuze and the political. London, England: Routledge.
27.
PearceC. (2010). The life of suggestions. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 902-908.
28.
PearsonP. (2001). Towards a theory of children’s drawing as social practice. Studies in Art Education, 40, 348-365.
29.
TomlinsonH.BurchellG. (1994). Introduction: The question then… In What is philosophy?New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
30.
Trafi-PratsL. (2014). The existential territories of global childhoods: Resingularizing subjectivity through ecologies of care and the art of Ahlam Shibli. Bank Street Occasional Papers, 31, 34-49.
31.
RajchmanJ. (2000). The Deleuze connections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32.
ReadingsB. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
SchulteC. M. (2011). Verbalization in children’s drawing performances: Toward a metaphorical continuum of inscription, extension, and re-inscription. Studies in Art Education, 53, 20-34.
34.
SchulteC. M. (2015). Lines of deterritorialization: The becoming-minor of Carter’s drawing. Studies in Art Education, 56, 142-155.
SomervilleM. (2011). Body/place journal writing. In SomervilleM.DaviesB.PowerK.GannonS.de CarteretP. (Eds.), Place pedagogy change (pp. 15-28). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
37.
SomervilleM.DaviesB.PowerK.GannonS.de CarteretP. (2011). Place pedagogy change. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
38.
StivaleC. J. (2005). Introduction: Gilles Deleuze, a life in friendship. In StivaleC. J. (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key concepts (pp. 1-18). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
39.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189.
40.
St. PierreE. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 223-227.
41.
St. PierreE. A. (in press). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical Inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory.
42.
TarrP. (2003). Reflections on the image of the child: Reproducer or creator of culture. Art Education, 56(4), 6-11.
43.
TaylorC. (1979). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In RabinowP.SullivanW. M. (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader (pp. 25-71). Berkley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1971)
44.
ThompsonC. M.BalesS. (1991). “Michael doesn’t like my dinosaurs”: Conversations in a preschool art class. Studies in Art Education, 33(1), 43-55.
45.
ThompsonC. M. (2013). Repositioning the visual arts in early childhood education: Continuing reconsideration. In SarachoO. N.SpodekB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 219-240). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
ThompsonC. M.BalesS. (1991). “Michael doesn’t like my dinosaurs”: Conversations in a preschool art class. Studies in Art Education, 33, 43-55.
47.
WhiteS. (2000). Sustaining affirmation: The strengths of weak ontology in political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
WilsonB. (1997a). Child art, multiple interpretations, and conflicts of interest. In KindlerA. M. (Ed.), Child development in art (pp. 81-94). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
49.
WilsonB. (1997b). Types of child art and alternative developmental accounts: Interpreting the interpreters. Human Development, 40, 155-168.
