In this autoethnographical essay, I focus on the difficulties related to improper use of a second language. I show how such misuse contributes to the attribution of personality qualities to the speaker and, consequently, how the identity of the speaker gets lost and replaced by a new (acoustic) identity. Such acoustic identity is given by pragmatic failures that emerge when people speak a second language.
ChiangS.MiH. (2011). Reformulation: A verbal display of interlanguage awareness in instructional interactions. Language Awareness, 20, 135-149.
2.
ConradD. (2008). Performance ethnography. In GivenL. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 608-612). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
3.
CoomberM. (2013). Which “I” is really me? Identity, pronouns and language learning. Linguistics Journal, 7, 167-188.
4.
DenzinN. (2003). Performing [auto] ethnography politically. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 25, 257-278.
5.
DenzinN. (2006). Analytic autoethnography, or Déjà Vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 419-428.
6.
EllisC. (1998). “I hate my voice” Coming to terms with minor bodily stigmas. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(4), 517-537.
7.
EllisC. (2009). Fighting back or moving on: An autoethnographic response to critics. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2, 371-378.
8.
EllisC.BochnerA. (2003). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 733-768). Walnut Creek, CA: Sage.
9.
FeliuJ. (2007). Nuevas Formas Literarias para las Ciencias Sociales: El Caso de la Autoetnografía [New literary forms in Social Sciences: The case of autoethnography]. Athenea Digital, 12, 262-271.
10.
FilmerA. (2007). Bilingual Belonging and the Whiteness of (Standard) English(es). Qualitative Inquiry, 13(6), 747-765.
11.
GuM.TongH. (2012). Space, scale and languages: Identity construction of cross boundary students in a multilingual university in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 26, 501-515.
12.
Holman JonesS. (2008). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 763-791). London, England: Sage.
13.
HoreaI. C. (2013). Reception of spoken English: Mishearings in the language of business and law. Annals of the University of Oradea Economic Science Series, 22, 396-402.
14.
Padilla CruzM. (2013). Understanding and overcoming pragmatic failure in intercultural communication: From focus on speakers to focus on hearers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51, 23-54.
15.
PaulJ. (2013). Improving communication with foreign speakers on the shop floor. Safety Science, 52, 65-72.
16.
RubdyR.McKayS. (2013). “Foreign workers” in Singapore: Conflicting discourses, language politics and the negotiation of immigrant identities. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 222, 157-185.
17.
SearsC. (2012). Negotiating identity in English-medium settings: Agency, resistance and appropriation among speakers of other languages in an international school. Journal of Research in International Education, 12(2), 117-136.
18.
SeelO. (2005). Non-verbal means as culture specific determinants that favour directionality into the foreign language in simultaneous interpreting. Communication & Cognition, 38, 63-82.
19.
SpernesK. (2012). “I use my mother tongue at home and with friends—Not in school!” Multilingualism and identity in rural Kenya. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25, 189-203.
SpryT. (2011). Performative autoethnography. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 497-512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
SubapriyaK. (2009). The importance of non-verbal cues. ICFAI Journal of Soft Skills, 3(2), 37-42.
23.
TedlockB. (2005). The observation of participation and the emergence of public ethnography. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd. ed., pp. 467-481). London, England: SAGE.
24.
ThomasJ. (1983). Cross cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
25.
WeinerB. (2010). The development of an atributed based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educationla Psychology, 45(1), 28-36.