In this article, the authors engage with three emerging debates germane to contemporary biopolitics: (a) How do we advance the critical interrogation of the biopolitics of human movement? (b) How and in what ways might we “move” about (and ideally against) regimes and systems of biopolitical subjectivity? and (c) How might “moving” methods of writing, representation, and performance bring light to contemporary biopolitical struggles, contestations, and power relations?
DenisonJ.MarkulaP. (Eds.). (2003). Moving writing: Crafting movement in sport research. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
8.
EspositoR. (2008). Bios: Biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
FoucaultM. (1980). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
10.
FoucaultM. (2000). The subject and power. In FoucaultM. (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Michel Foucault (Vol. 3, “pp. 134-156). New York, NY: New Press.
11.
GiardinaM. D.NewmanJ. I. (2011a). The physical and the possible. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 11, 392-402.
12.
GiardinaM. D.NewmanJ. I. (2011b). What is this ‘physical’ in physical cultural studies?Sociology of Sport Journal, 28(1), 36-63.
13.
HalleyJ. (2012). The parallel lives of women and cows: Meat markets. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
HardtM. (2007). Foreward. In CloughP. T.HalleyJ. (Eds.), The affective turn: Theorizing the social (pp. ix-xii). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
HardtM.NegriA. (2001). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
HardtM.NegriA. (2005). Multitude. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HardtM.NegriA. (2011). Commonwealth. New York, NY: Bellknap Press.
18.
LemkeT. (2011) Critique and experience in Foucault. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(4), 26-48.
19.
MaussM. (1973). Letter to S. Ranulph. In GaneM. (Ed.), The radical sociology of Durkheim and Mauss (pp. 214-215). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1934).
20.
MoreiraC. (2011). Tales of Conde: Autoethnography and the body politics of performative writing. Cultural Studies ↔Critical Methodologies, 11, 586-595.
21.
NancyJ.-L. (2008). Corpus (RandR. A., Trans.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
22.
PopovicM. L. (2012). Moksha rose from the heart: A prosaic and poetic embodiment of yoga autoethnography. Cultural Studies ↔Critical Methodologies, 12, 30-42.
RoseN. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
SeigworthG. J.GreggM. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In SiegworthG. J.GreggM. (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1-28). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
SinnerbrinkR. (2005). From Machenschaft to biopolitics: A genealogical critique of biopower. Critical Horizons, 6, 239-265.
27.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Anything can happen and does. Cultural Studies ↔Critical Methodologies, 11, 386-389.
