In this article, I take a philosophical and literary approach to collaborative writing as inquiry, examining the intersubjective ethics of dialogue involved in narrative collaboration. I argue that autobiography and cultural studies have not delved deeply enough into the ethical implications of dialogue in collaborative life writing, which has resulted in an impoverished sense of responsibility in practices of writing with vulnerable subjects who have experienced trauma, marginalization, or oppression. Drawing on Paul Ricoeur’s description of dialogue as a process of verbal interaction and an expression of ethical intersubjectivity, I develop two critical aspects of dialogue—the hospitality of reception and the reciprocity of response—to show how both are necessary for collaborative partnerships to flourish and for vulnerable subjects to reconstitute themselves beyond their victimhood. I then examine how these ethical aspects work themselves out in practice through a study of the narrative collaboration, Stolen Life, by Rudy Wiebe and Yvonne Johnson.
AlcoffL. M. (1991-1992). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5-32.
2.
ArmstrongJ. (Ed.). (1993). Looking at the words of our people: First Nation analysis of literature. Penticton, British Columbia, Canada: Theytus.
3.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (HolquistM., Ed. & HolquistM.EmersonC., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BakhtinM. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (EmersonC., Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BeckE. (2001). Postcolonial complexity in the writings of Rudy Wiebe. Modern Fiction Studies, 47, 855-886.
6.
BuberM. (1958). I and thou (SmithR. G., Trans.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
7.
CouserT. (2004). Vulnerable subjects: Ethics and life writing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
DaviesB.GannonS. (2006). Doing collective biography. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
9.
DerridaJ. (1995). The gift of death (WillsD., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
EakinP. J. (1998). The unseemly profession: Privacy, inviolate personality, and the ethics of life writing. In AdamsonJ.FreadmanR.ParkerD. (Eds.), Renegotiating ethics in literature, philosophy, and theory (pp. 161-180). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
EakinP. J. (1999). How our lives become stories. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
EganS. (1999). Mirror talk: Genres of crisis in contemporary autobiography. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
13.
FelmanS.LaubD. (1992). Testimony: Crisis of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2009). Between the two: A nomadic inquiry into the collaborative writing and subjectivity. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
15.
GilmoreL. (2001). The limits of autobiography: Trauma and testimony. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
HallD. W. (2007). Paul Ricoeur and the poetic imperative: The creative tension between love and justice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
17.
JonesM. (2003). Stolen life? Reading through two I’s in postcolonial collaborative autobiography. In MossL. (Ed.), Is Canada postcolonial: Unsettling Canadian literature (pp. 207-222). Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
18.
KearneyR. (2006). Introduction. In RicoeurP. (Ed.), On translation (pp. vii-xx). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
KingT. (Ed.). (1990). All my relations: An anthology of contemporary Canadian native fiction. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: McClelland.
20.
LairdH. (1995). On collaborations, Part II. TULSA Studies in Women’s Literature, 14, 11-18.
21.
LejeuneP. (1989). The autobiography of those who do not write. In EakinP. J. (Ed.), On autobiography (LearyK., Trans., pp. 185-215). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
LeviP. (1989). The drowned and the saved (RosenthalR., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
23.
LevinasE. (1985). Ethics and infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo (CohenR., Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
24.
MaracleL. (1989). Moving over. Trivia, 14, 9-12.
25.
MarionJ.-L. (2002). Being given: Toward a phenomenology of givenness (KoskyJ. L., Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
McCallS. (2011). First person plural: Aboriginal storytelling and the ethics of collaborative authorship. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
27.
MillerN. K.TougawJ. (Eds.). (2002). Extremities: Trauma, testimony, and community. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28.
MoranG. (1996). A grammar of responsibility. New York, NY: Crossroad.
MosesD. D.GoldieT. (Eds.). (1992). An anthology of Canadian native literature in English. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
31.
NemethM. (1998, July13). Native connection: A writer and convicted murderer tells her story. Maclean’s, p. 64
32.
OliverK. (2001). Witnessing beyond recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
PeperzakA. (2002). Giving. In WyschogrodE.GouxJ.-J.BoyntonE. (Eds.), The enigma of gift and sacrifice (pp. 161-175). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
34.
PerreaultJ.VanceS. (Eds.). (1990). Writing the circle: Native women of western Canada. Edmonton, UK: NeWest.
35.
PetroneP. (1990). Native literature in Canada: From the oral tradition to the present. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
36.
RicoeurP. (1992). Oneself as another (BlameyK., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
RicoeurP. (2000, p. xiii). The just (PellauerD., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
RymhsD. (2005). Auto/biographical jurisdictions: Collaboration, self-representation, and the law in Stolen life: The journey of a Cree woman. In RakJ. (Ed.), Auto/biography in Canada: Critical directions (pp. 89-108). Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfred Laurier Press.
39.
SchafferK.SmithS. (2004). Human rights and narrated lives: The ethics of recognition. New York, NY: Palgrave.
40.
ShandlerR. (2007). A long labour: A Dutch mother’s Holocaust memoir. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Ronsdale.
41.
SheremataD. (1998, July20). White man’s burden. Newsmagazine, 25(31), 28-31.
42.
SilmanJ. (Ed.). (1987). Enough is enough: Aboriginal women speak out. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Women’s Press.
43.
SpeedyJ. (2008). Narrative inquiry and psychotherapy. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
44.
SpeedyJ. (2012). Collaborative writing and ethical know-how. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 349-356.
45.
SpivakG. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossberL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
46.
WiebeR. (1973). The temptations of Big Bear. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: McClelland & Steward.
47.
WiebeR. (1994). The discovery of strangers. Toronto, Ontario: Alfred A. Knopf Canada.
48.
WiebeR.JohnsonY. (1998). Stolen life: The journey of a Cree woman. Toronto, Ontario: Alfred A. Knopf Canada.
49.
WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB. (2011). Deleuze and collaborative writing: An immanent plane of composition. New York: Peter Lang.
