This article describes a collaborative writing strategy when you are alone. It is the story of how I came to bring Phineas, the protagonist in A. S. Byatt’s The Biographer’s Tale, into my writing process as a third voice in my dialogue with my data. It is a self-reflective text that shows how co-writers are always present, even when you might feel that you are writing all alone. In The Biographer’s Tale, the academic Phineas renounces his post-structural dissertation project in literature to search for “things” and “facts.” He decides to write a biography. However, Phineas discovers that “facts” are slippery and not easily “pieced together.” Phineas writes about his struggles, and so do I. Through co-writing with Phineas, I gradually found a voice of experience, which helped me to transforming my ethnographic data into research texts.
ByattA. S. (1990). Possessions. London, England: Chatto & Windus.
7.
ByattA. S. (2001). The biographer’s tale. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
8.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Czarniawska-JoergesB.de MonthouxP. (Eds.) (1994). Good novels, better management: Reading organizational realities in fiction. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
10.
DelamontS.AtkinsonP.PugsleyL. (2010). The concept smacks of magic: Fighting familiarity today. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 3-10.
11.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2007). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
12.
DiversiM.MoreiraC. (2009). Betweener talk: Decolonizing knowledge production, pedagogy, and praxis. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
13.
EdwardsR.BiestaG.ThorpeM. (Eds.) (2009). Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks. Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
14.
EllingtonL. L. (2011). Analysis and representation across the continuum. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 595-610). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
15.
EngeströmY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
16.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2010). Between the two: A nomadic inquiry into collaborative writing and subjectivity. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
17.
GeertzC. (1989). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
HasseC. (2011). Kulturanalyse i organisationer. Begreber, metoder og forbløffende læreprocesser [Culture analyses in organisations. Concepts, methods and amazing learning processes]. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
19.
HastrupK. (1990). The ethnographic present: A reinvention. Cultural Anthropology, 5, 45-61.
20.
HylandK. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.
21.
KerosuoH. (2006). Boundaries in action: An activity-theoretical study of development, learning, and change in health care organization for patients with multiple and chronic illnesses (Doctoral dissertation). Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
22.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1993). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980)
23.
LatherP. A. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. New York: State University of New York.
LeavyP. (2012). Fiction and critical perspectives on social research a research note. Humanity & Society, 36, 251-259.
26.
MarcusG. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
MartinJ. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. London, England: Oxford University Press.
28.
NewellA.ShawJ.SimonH. (1962). The process of creative thinking. In GruberH.TerrellG.WerheimerM. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63-119). New York: Atherton Press.
29.
OrrJ. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
OttoS. (2007). Beneath and beyond truth: Studying literary narratives to research human phenomena. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30, 73-87.
31.
PackerM. J. (2010). The science of qualitative research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PineauE. (2012). Haunted by ghosts: Collaborating with absent others. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 459-465.
33.
RatnerC. (2002). Subjectivity and objectivity in qualitative methodology. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Article 16.
34.
RichardsonL. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences (Vol. 21). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
RichardsonL. (1995). Writing-stories: Co-authoring “the sea monster,” a writing-story. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 189-203.
36.
RichardsonL. (2003). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 499-541). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
RingerA. (2013). Researcher-participant positioning and the discursive work of categories: Experiences from fieldwork in the mental health services. Qualitative Studies, 4, 1-20.
38.
SpeedyJ. (2012). Collaborative writing and ethical know-how: Movements within the space around scholarship, the academy and the social research imaginary. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 349-356.
39.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 403-417.
40.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611-625). Los Angeles: Sage.
41.
Van MaanenJ. (2010). A song for my supper: More tales of the field. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 240-255.
42.
Varga-DobaiK. (2012). The relationship of researcher and participant in qualitative inquiry: From “self and other” binaries to the poststructural feminist perspective of subjectivity. The Qualitative Report, 17, Article 93.
43.
WatsonC. (2011). Staking a small claim for fictional narratives in social and educational research. Qualitative Research, 11, 395-408.
WegenerC.TanggaardL. (2012). The concept of innovation as perceived by public sector frontline staff—Outline of a tripartite empirical model of innovation. Studies in Continuing Education, 35, 82-101.
46.
WegenerC. (2013). ‘Would you like a cup of coffee?’ Using the researcher’s insider and outsider positions as a sensitizing concept. Ethnography and Education, (ahead-of-print), 1-20.
47.
WillisP. (2008). The work of portrayal: Expressive approaches to educational research. In LiamputtongP.RumboldJ. (Eds.), Knowing differently: Arts-based and collaborative research methods (pp. 49-65). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
