This article examines how photographic practices in collaborative research might mediate migrant voices. It looks at the case of Shutter Stories, a collaborative photography project featuring images by Indian and Korean migrants in Manila, the Philippines. Drawing on life-story interviews and participant observation data, I identify two ways that the photographic selection practices in the project mediated the migrants’ photo essays. One is how subject selection practices led the participants to use both strategic and ‘medium’ essentialism in choosing their topics. The second is how technique selection practices enabled the participants to express vernacular creativity in crafting their images. I argue that the mediation instantiated by Shutter Stories fostered the participants’ ability to use photo essays to articulate voices that simultaneously conveyed their personal stories and engaged the viewing public. However, I also identify the limits of this mediation, indicating how future projects can better enable migrant voices.
ArcherM (2007) Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BanksM (2007) Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
3.
BeckerH (2004) Afterword: Photography as evidence, photographs as exposition. In: KnowlesCSweetmanP (eds) Picturing the Social Landscape: Visual Methods and the Sociological Imagination. London: Routledge, pp. 193–197.
4.
BourdieuP (2003 [1990]) Photography: A Middle-brow Art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BuckinghamD (2009) ‘Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society31: 633–652.
6.
BurgessJ (2006) Hearing ordinary voices: cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling. Continuum: Journal of Media and Culture20(2): 201–214.
7.
CabañesJVA (2014) Multicultural mediations, developing world realities: Indians, Koreans and Manila’s entertainment media. Media, Culture & Society36(5): 628–643.
8.
CabañesJVA (2017) Migrant narratives as photo stories: on the properties of photography and the mediation of migrant voices. Visual Studies32(1): 33–46.
9.
ChaplinE (1994) Sociology and Visual Representation. London: Routledge.
10.
ColemanS (2013) How Voters Feel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CouldryN (2010) Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. London: Sage.
12.
DattaA (2011) Where is the global city? Visual narratives of London among East European migrants. Urban Studies49(8): 1725–1740.
13.
GauntlettD (2011) Making Is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity.
14.
GradyJ (2004) Working with visible evidence: an invitation and some practical advice. In: KnowlesCSweetmanP (eds) Picturing the Social Landscape: Visual Methods and the Sociological Imagination. London: Routledge, pp. 18–31.
15.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (1983) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
16.
HarrisonB (2002) Photographic visions and narrative inquiry. Narrative Inquiry12(1): 87–111.
17.
HarrisonC (2003) Visual social semiotics: understanding how still images make meanings. Technical Communication50(1): 46–50.
18.
HollandP (2004) ‘Sweet it is to scan …’: personal photographs and popular photography. In: WellsL (ed.) Photography: A Critical Introduction, 3rd edn.London: Routledge, pp. 113–158.
19.
HutchbyI (2001) Technologies, texts, and affordances. Sociology35(2): 441–456.
20.
KendallL (2006) Something old …: remembering Korean wedding hall photographs from the 1980s. Visual Anthropology19(1): 1–19.
21.
Mac an GhaillM (1996) Understanding Masculinities: Social Relations and Cultural Arenas. Buckingham: Open University Press.
22.
MessarisP (1997) Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
SalazarLC (2008) The Indian community in Metro Manila: continuities, changes and the effects of rising India. In: KesavapanyKManiARamasamyP (eds) Rising India and Indian Communities in East Asia. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, pp. 499–524.
33.
SharplesMDavisonLThomasGVRudmanPD (2003) Children as photographers: an analysis of children’s photographic behavior and intentions at three age levels. Visual Communication2(3): 303–330.
34.
SilverstoneR (1999) Why Study the Media?London: Sage.
35.
SilverstoneR (2002) Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History33(4): 761–780.
36.
SlaterD (1995) Domestic photography and digital culture. In: ListerM (ed.) The Photographic Image in Digital Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 129–146.
37.
SpivakGC (1988) Subaltern studies: deconstructing historiography. In: GuhaRSpivakG (eds) In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–221.
38.
SutherlandCChengY (2009) Participatory action research with (im)migrant women in two small Canadian cities: using photovoice in Kingston and Peterborough, Ontario. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies7: 290–307.
39.
ThumimN (2012) Self-representation and Digital Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
Van HouseNDavisMAmesMFinnMViswanathanV (2005) The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), Portland, OR, USA.
41.
YeJ (2013) Notes from ‘migrant encounters’: visualizing Singapore’s diversity through South Asian male migrants. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography34: 407–413.
