This article responds to Bersani’s critique of psychoanalysis’ personalism by focusing on the role of art, images, and objects in both psychoanalysis and sociology. I take examples of my research in visual art, and images conjured in my own psychoanalytic treatment, to look at the nonhuman agencies present in these relationships.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801-831.
2.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BersaniL.PhillipsA. (2010). Intimacies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
CloughP. (Ed.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.BurchellG., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
6.
GroszE. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7.
HansenM. (2006). Bodies in code?Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
O’SullivanS. (2008). Art encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought beyond representation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
