Following a brief exposition and new interpretation of Robert Park’s theory of conflict, it is subjected to critical examination. Since Park deduced his explanation of race relations from this more general theory and since his ideas about race relations and work for Booker T. Washington are intimately connected with his loss of favor in sociology, they are included as part of this examination. On the one hand, it is found that the characterizations of Park’s ideas on race relations, especially his famous notion of the “race-relations cycle,” as inherently conservative and his work on behalf of Washington as that of a “race-broker” are misguided. On the other hand, it is found that his general theory of conflict suffers from several shortcomings, including that he failed to (a) distinguish dominance from power, (b) make dominance disputes his basic unit of analysis, and (c) identify the stages which conflicts or, more precisely, dominative disputes, unfold. Dispute these flaws, Park’s analysis of conflict still provides an invaluable fund of ideas for advancing our understanding of social conflict, which should not be dismissed because of mischaracterizations of him and his views. Thus, in my opinion, social scientists would now be well-advised to reexamine both Park’s general model of conflict and his specific application of it to race relations.
AthensL. (2002). Domination: The blind spot in mead’s analysis of the social act. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2, 25-42.
2.
AthensL. (2005). Violent encounters: Violent engagements, skirmishes, and tiffs. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34, 1-48.
3.
AthensL. (2007a). Mead, George Herbert. Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 6, 2861-2864.
4.
AthensL. (2007b). Radical interactionism: Going beyond Mead. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 37, 137-165.
5.
AthensL. (2010). Human subordination from a radical interactionist perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 40, 340-368.
6.
BlumerH. (1928). Method in social psychology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
7.
BlumerH. (1937). Social psychology. In SchmidtE. (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144-198). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
8.
BlumerH. (1953). Psychological import of the human group. In SherifM.WilsonM. (Eds.), Group relations at the cross roads (pp.185-202). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
9.
BlumerH. (1962). Society as symbolic interaction. In RoseA. (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 179-192). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
BlumerH. (1969b). Collective behavior. In LeeA. (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp. 65-121). New York, NY: Barnes & Noble. (Original work published 1939)
12.
BowserB. (2002a). The contributions of blacks to sociological knowledge: A problem of theory and role. In WashingtonR.CunnigenD. (Eds.), Confronting the American dilemma of race: The second generation black sociologists (pp. 3-20). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Original work published 1981)
13.
BowserB. (2002b). Classical black sociologists and social theory: Anatomy of a controversy. In WashingtonR.CunnigenD. (Eds.), Confronting the American dilemma of race: The second generation black sociologists (pp. 49-70). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.(Original work published 1981)
14.
CareyJ. (1975). Sociology and public affairs: The Chicago School. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
CollinsR. (1975). Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York, NY: Academic Press.
16.
CollinsR. (1994). Four sociological theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
CollinsR. (2008). Violence: A micro-sociological theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
CoxO. (1944). The racial theories of Robert .E. Park and Ruth Benedict. Journal of Negro Education, 13, 452-463.
19.
DeeganM.Jo. (2007). The Chicago school of ethnography. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 11-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Original work published 2001)
20.
DenzinN. (2001). Symbolic interactionism, poststructuralism, and the racial subject. Symbolic Interaction, 24, 243-249.
21.
DeweyJ. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published 1922)
22.
DrakeSt. Clair. (1984). Introduction. In WashingtonB.ParkR. (Eds.), The man farthest down (pp. v-xiv). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
23.
DrakeSt. ClairClaytonH. R. (1993). Black metropolis. A study of negro life in a northern city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1945)
24.
Du BoisW. E. B. (2003). The souls of black folks. New York, NY: Modern Library. (Original work published 1953)
25.
EllisonR. (1964). Shadow and act. New York, NY: Quality Paperback.
26.
FarisE. (1944). Robert E. Park: 1864-1944. American Sociological Review, 9, 322-325.
27.
FarisR. (1970). Chicago sociology: 1920-1932. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
FisherB.StraussA. (1978). Interactionism. In BottomoreT.NesbitR. (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 457-498). New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
GrosbyS. (1998). The place of the Chicago school of sociology in the study of nationality and ethnicity. In TomasiL. (Ed.), The tradition of the Chicago school of sociology (pp. 51-72). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
30.
HughesE.1950. Preface. In HughesE. (Ed.), Race and culture: Essays in the sociology of contemporary man (pp. xi-xiv). New York, NY: Free Press.
31.
HughesE. (1964). Robert E. Park. In HughesE. (Ed.), The sociological eye: Selected papers (pp. 545-549). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
32.
JoasH. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago, IL: University Press.
33.
KivistoP. (2004). What is the canonical theory of assimilation? Robert E. Park and his predecessors. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40, 149-163.
34.
KriesburgL. (2003). Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
KuhnM. (1964). Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. The Sociological Quarterly, 5, 61-84.
36.
LalB. (1990). The romance of culture in an urban civilization. London, England: Routledge.
37.
LauerR.HandelW. H. (1977). Social psychology: The theory and application of symbolic interactionism. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
38.
LymanS. (1972). The black American in sociological thought. New York, NY: Putnam.
39.
LymanS. (1994). Color, culture, civilization: Race and minority issues in American society. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
40.
LymanS.VidichA. (1988). The problem of a public philosophy: A sociological perspective. In LymanS.VidichA. (Eds.), Selected works of Herbert Blumer: A public philosophy for a mass society. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
41.
MainesD.BridgerJ.UlmerJ. (1996). Mythic facts and park’s pragmatism: On predecessor-selection and theorizing in human ecology. Sociological Quarterly, 521-549.
42.
MatthewsF. (1977). Quest for an American sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago school. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University.
43.
MeadG. (1909). Social psychology as counterpart to physiological psychology. In ReckA. (Ed.), Mead: Selected writings (pp. 94-104). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
44.
MeadG. (1910a). What social objects must psychology presuppose? In ReckA. (Ed.), Mead: Selected writings (pp. 105-113). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
45.
MeadG. (1910b). Social consciousness and the consciousness of meaning. In ReckA. (Ed.), Mead: Selected writings (pp. 123-133). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
46.
MeadG. (1912). The mechanism of social consciousness. In ReckA. (Ed.), Mead: Selected writings (pp. 134-141). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
47.
MeadG. (1922). A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. Journal of Philosophy, 19, 157-163.
48.
MeadG. (1964). The social self. In ReckA. (Ed.), Mead: Selected writings (pp. 142-149). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1913)
MusolfG. (2003). Structure and agency in everyday life. Oxford, England. Roman & Littlefield.
51.
ParkR. (1950). Race and culture: Essays in the sociology of contemporary man (HughesE., Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
52.
ParkR. (1950a). Race-relations cycle in Hawaii. In HughesE. (Ed.), Race and culture: Essays in the sociology of contemporary man (pp. 189-195). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1937)
53.
ParkR. (1950b). Our racial frontier on the pacific. In HughesE. (Ed.), Race and culture: Essays in the sociology of contemporary man (pp. 138-157). (Original work published 1926)
54.
ParkRobert. (1950c). An autobiographical note. In HughesE. (Ed.), Race and culture: Essays in the sociology of contemporary mans (pp. v-ix). New York, NY: Free Press.
55.
ParkR. (1950d). Education in its relation to the conflict and fusion of cultures. In HughesE. (Ed.), Race and culture: Essays in the sociology of contemporary man (pp. 261-283). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1918)
56.
ParkR. (1952). Human communities: The city and human ecology (HughesE., Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
57.
ParkR. (1952a). Dominance. In HughesE. (Ed.), Human communities: The city and human ecology (pp. 159-164). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1934)
58.
ParkR. (1952b). Human ecology. In HughesE. (Ed.), Human communities: The city and human ecology (pp. 145-158). New York, NY: Free Press, pp. 145-158. (Original work published 1936)
59.
ParkR. (1952c). Succession, an ecological concept. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 223-232). New York, NY: Free Press.
60.
ParkR. (1955). Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (HughesE., Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
61.
ParkR. (1955a). News and the human interest story. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 105-114). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1940)
62.
ParkR. (1955b). Human nature and collective behavior. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 13-21). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1927)
63.
ParkR. (1955c). War and politics. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 50-68). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1941)
64.
ParkR. (1955d). Physics and society. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 301-321). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1940)
65.
ParkR. (1955e). The strike. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 30-33). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1928)
66.
ParkR. (1955f). Revolution. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp. 34-37). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1927)
67.
ParkR. (1955g). Modern society. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp.322-41). New York, NY: Free press. (Original work published, 1942).
68.
ParkR. (1955h). Social planning and human nature. In HughesE. (Ed.), Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society (pp.38-49). New York, NY, Free Press. (Original work published in 1935).
69.
ParkR.BurgessE. (1924). Introduction to the science of sociology (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
RaushenbushW. (1979). Robert E. Park: Biography of a sociologist. Durham, NC: Duke University.
71.
ReitzesD.ReitzesD. (1993). The social psychology of Robert E. Park: Human nature, self, personality and social structure. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 39-63.
72.
ReynoldsL. (1994). Intellectual antecedents. In HermanN.ReynoldsL. (Eds.), Symbolic interaction (pp. 6-24). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
73.
RoseA. (1962). Preface. In RoseA. (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. vii-xii). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
74.
SchellenbergT. (1982). The science of conflict. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
75.
ShilsE. (1991). Robert E. Park: 1864-1944. American Scholar, 91, 120-127.
76.
SimmelG. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (WolfK., Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
77.
SimmelG. (1955). Conflict & the web of group-affiliations. New York, NY: Free Press.
78.
SimmelG. (1971). Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (LevineD., Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
StanfieldJ. (1985). Philanthropy and Jim Crow in American social science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
82.
SumnerW. (1906). Folkways. Boston, MA: Ginn.
83.
TurnerR. (1967). Introduction. In TurnerR. (Ed.), Robert E. Park on social control and collective behavior: Selected papers (pp. ix-xlvi). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
84.
WashingtonR. (1993). Revisioning a classical American sociologist: Robert E. Park. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 7, 97-107.
85.
WattsJ. (2002). On reconsidering Park, Johnson, Dubois, Frazier, and Reid: Reply to Benjamin’s Bowser’s The contribution of blacks to sociological knowledge. In WashingtonR.CunnigenD. (Eds.), Confronting the American dilemma of race: The second generation black sociologists (pp. 21-48). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
86.
WileyN. (2011). The Chicago school: A political interpretation. In DenzinN. (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (pp. 39-74). Bingley, England: Emerald.
87.
YoungA. (2002). The negro problem and the character of the black community: Charles Johnson, E. Franklin Frazier and the constitution of a black sociological tradition, 1920-1935. In WashingtonR.CunnigenD. (Eds.), Confronting the American dilemma of race: The second generation black sociologists (pp. 71-108). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
