In the wake of the child abuse scandal at Penn State, much attention was given to the role of Joe Paterno, who had spent 46 years as the university’s head football coach. Paterno’s subsequent death, just months after he had been fired by the Board of Trustees, provoked numerous efforts in sports media to determine his “legacy.“ Such attempts to make sense of Paterno’s legacy, and to do so immediately, spotlight our collective anxieties and prompt the symbolic contests that are symptomatic of public memory. This essay reflects on the choices we make and the opportunities we miss when memorializing a figure of Paterno’s stature.
BieseckerB. A. (2002). Remembering World War II: The rhetoric and politics of national commemoration at the turn of the 21st century. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88, 393-409.
3.
BlairC.DickinsonG.OttB. L. (2010). Introduction: Rhetoric/ memory/place. In DickinsonG.BlairC.OttB. L. (Eds.), Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials (pp. 1-54). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
4.
BodnarJ. (1992). Remaking America: Public memory, commemoration, and patriotism in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
DickinsonG.BlairC.OttB. L. (Eds.). (2010). Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
NoonD. H. (2004). Operation enduring analogy: World War II, the war on terror, and the uses of historical memory. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 7, 339-366.
14.
OlickJ. K. (2007). The politics of regret: On collective memory and historical responsibility. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
PhillipsK. (Ed.). (2004). Framing public memory. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
