Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article identifies Carey's contributions to the concept of technoculture and attempts to systematize his writings on communication, culture, and technology in order to craft a methodological strategy for the study of technoculture based on participant observation and contemporary ethnographic practices of representation. After introducing a definition of technoculture, we outline how technography—the study of technoculture in everyday life—builds upon two sensitizing metaphors: technoculture as ecology and as semiosis. The discussion of technography shows the potential of this research strategy for the study of the symbolic interaction among technics, technological practices, social agents, and the natural environment.

Keywords

technology culture research methodology ethnography symbolic interaction James W. Carey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carey, J.W. (1978). The ambiguity of policy research. Journal of Communication, 28, 114-119.

Carey, J.W. (1989a). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York: Routledge.

Carey, J.W. (1989b). Technology and ideology: The case of the telegraph . In J. Carey (Ed.), Communication as culture: Essays on media and society (pp. 201-230). New York: Routledge.

Carey, J.W. (1997a). Afterword: The culture in question. In E. Munson & C. Warren (Eds.), James Carey: A critical reader (pp. 308-339). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Carey, J.W. (1997b). The Chicago school and the history of mass communication research. In E. Munson & C. Warren (Eds.), James Carey: A critical reader (pp. 14-33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Carey, J.W. (1997c). Reflections on the project of (American) cultural studies. In M. Ferguson & P. Goulding (Eds.), Cultural studies in question (pp. 1-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Carey, J.W. (1999). Innis "in" Chicago: Hope as the sire of discovery . In C. Acland & W. Buxton (Eds.), Harold Innis in the new century: Reflections and refractions (pp. 81-104). Montreal, Quebec , Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.

Carey, J.W. (2006). Configurations of culture, history, and politics. Interview with Lawrence Grossberg. In J. Packer & C. Robertson (Eds.), Thinking with James Carey: Essays on communications, transportation, history (pp. 199-226). New York: Peter Lang.

Christians, C. (1998). The sacredness of life. Media Development, 2, 3-7.

10.

Christians, C. , & Carey, J. (1981). The logic of qualitative research. In G. Stempel & B. Westley (Eds.), Research methods in mass communications (pp. 342-362). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

11.

Halton, E. (2004). The living gesture and the signifying moment. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 89-114.

12.

Hay, J. (2006). Between cultural materialism and spatial materialism: James Carey's writing about communication. In J. Packer & C. Robertson (Eds.), Thinking with James Carey: Essays on communications, transportation, history (pp. 29-56). New York: Peter Lang.

13.

Hodson, J. , & Vannini, P. (2007). Island time: The media logic and ritual of ferry commuting on Gabriola Island, BC. Canadian Journal of Communication , 32, 261-275.

14.

Kroker, A. (1984). Technology and the Canadian mind: Innis/McLuhan/Grant . Montreal, Quebec, Canada: NWP .

15.

Mead, G.H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Vannini, P. , & Vannini, A. (2008). Of walking shoes, boats, golf carts, bicycles, and a slow technoculture: A technography of movement and embodied media on Protection Island, BC. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 1272-1301.

Toward a Technography of Everyday Life: The Methodological Legacy of James W. Carey's Ecology of Technoculture as Communication

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References