We analyze AP VoteCast survey data to determine if opinions toward the 2020 presidential election shaped participation and vote choice in the 2021 Georgia Senate runoff contests. Specifically, we estimate the impact of election denial and voter confidence on self-reported participation and voter preferences in the 2021 Georgia Senate runoffs. Election denial dampened the likelihood of voting in the 2021 Georgia Senate runoffs, and particularly among respondents aligned with President Trump. With respect to vote choice in these contests, election denial sided more with Republican preferences, whereas voter confidence increased Democratic support. This research highlights how opinions toward the 2020 presidential election registered notable effects on political behavior in the ensuing Georgia Senate runoffs, which decided partisan control of Congress’ upper chamber.
AbramowitzA. I. (2022). The polarized American electorate: The rise of partisan-ideological consistency and its consequences. Political Science Quarterly, 137(4), 645–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13388
2.
AlbertsonB.GuilerK. (2020). Conspiracy theories, election rigging, and support for democratic norms. Research & Politics, 7(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020959859
3.
AlgaraC.HaleI.StruthersC. L. (2022). No balance, no problem: Evidence of partisan voting in the 2021 Georgia U.S. Senate runoffs. American Politics Research, 50(4), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211070819
4.
AndersonC.MendesS. (2006). Learning to lose: Election outcomes, democratic experience and political protest potential. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123406000056
BenklerY.TiltonC.EtlingB.RobertsH.ClarkJ.FarisR.KaiserJ.SchmittC. (2020). Mail-in voter fraud: Anatomy of a disinformation campaign. Berkman Center Research Publication.
8.
BerlinskiN.DoyleM.GuessA. M.LevyG.LyonsB.MontgomeryJ. M.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2023). The effects of unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud on confidence in elections. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2021.18
9.
BorahP.González-GonzálezP.de ZúñigaH. G. (2025). ‘Stop the steal’: Misinformation correction and misperceptions about voter fraud. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2024-0512
BullockC. S.III. (2022). Georgia: America’s newest toss-up state. In Bullock IIIC. S.RozellM. J. (Eds.), The new politics of the old South: An introduction to southern politics (pp. 79–100). Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
CanonD. T.ShermanO. (2021). Debunking the ‘big lie’: Election administration in the 2020 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 51(3), 546–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12721
13.
ClaytonK.DavisN. T.NyhanB.PorterE.RyanT. J.WoodT. J. (2021). Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(23), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024125118
CottrellD.HerronM. C.WestwoodS. J. (2018). An exploration of Donald Trump’s allegations of massive voter fraud in the 2016 general election. Electoral Studies, 51(February), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.002
16.
DanillerA. M.MutzD. C. (2019). The dynamics of electoral integrity: A three-election panel study. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz002
17.
EndersA. M.UscinskiJ. E.KlofstadC. A.PremaratneK.SeeligM. I.WuchtyS.MurthiM. N.FunchionJ. R. (2021). The 2020 presidential election and beliefs about fraud: Continuity or change?Electoral Studies, 72(August), Article 102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102366
18.
FaheyJ. J. (2023). The big lie: Expressive responding and misperceptions in the United States. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2022.33
19.
FinkelE. J.BailC. A.CikaraM.DittoP. H.IyengarS.KlarS.MasonL.McGrathM. C.NyhanB.RandD. G.SkitkaL. J.TuckerJ. A.Van BavelJ. J.WangC. S.DruckmanJ. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
GreenJ.HobbsW.McCabeS.LazerD. (2022). Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(34), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115900119
HasenR. L. (2012). The voting wars: From Florida 2000 to the next election meltdown. Yale University Press.
25.
HoodM.V.IIIMcKeeS. C. (2019). Why Georgia, why? Peach State residents’ perceptions of voting improprieties and their impact on the 2018 gubernatorial election. Social Science Quarterly, 100(5), 1828–1847. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12655
26.
HoodM. V.IIIMcKeeS. C. (2022a). Rural Republican realignment in the modern South: The untold story. University of South Carolina Press.
27.
HoodM.V.IIIMcKeeS. C. (2022b). (In this issue). Getting the message: Opinion polarization over election law.Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 21(2), 124–134.
HoodM.V.IIIMcKeeS. C. (2024). Winners, losers, and voter confidence in response to partisan electoral reform. Political Science Quarterly, 139(4), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqae012
30.
JacobsonG. C. (2021). The presidential and congressional elections of 2020: A national referendum on the Trump presidency. Political Science Quarterly, 136(1), 11–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13133
31.
JacobsonG. C. (2023). The dimensions, origins, and consequences of belief in Donald Trump’s big lie. Political Science Quarterly, 138(2), 133–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqac030
32.
LevenduskyM.PattersonS.Jr.MargolisM.OphirY.WalterD.JamiesonK. H. (2024). The long shadow of the big lie: How beliefs about the legitimacy of the 2020 election spill over onto future elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(3), 933–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae047
33.
LevittJ. (2012). Election deform: The pursuit of unwarranted electoral regulation. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 11(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2011.11108
34.
LiY.HyunM.AlvarezR. M. (2021). Why do election results change after election day? The ‘blue shift’ in California elections. Political Research Quarterly, 75(3), 860–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211033340
35.
LovingS.SmithD. A. (2022). Riot in the party? Voter registrations in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection. Party Politics, 30(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221147666
36.
LupiaA. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944882
37.
McKeeS. C.EvansH. K.ClarkJ. H. (2022). The ‘PERFECT’ call: Congressional representation by tweet in the midst of the Ukraine whistleblower scandal. American Politics Research, 50(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211041922
38.
MonizP.SwannW. B. (2025). The power of Trump’s big lie: Identity fusion, internalizing misinformation, and support for Trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 58(3), 363–368.
39.
PennycookG.RandD. G. (2021). Research note: Examining false beliefs about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-51
40.
PersilyN.StewartC. S.III (2021). The miracle and tragedy of the 2020 U.S. election. Journal of Democracy, 32(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0026
41.
PiazzaJ. A. (2024). Allegations of Democratic election fraud and support for political violence among Republicans. American Politics Research, 52(6), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241263083
42.
PopkinS. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
43.
ShaferB. E. (2016). The American political pattern: Stability and change, 1932-2016. University Press of Kansas.
44.
ShaferB. E.WagnerR. L. (2019). The Trump presidency and the structure of modern American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 17(2), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592718003353
45.
ShawD. R.AlthausS. L.PanagopoulosC. (2024). Battleground: Electoral college strategies, execution, and impact in the modern era. Oxford University Press.
46.
ShinoE.SmithD. A.UribeL. (2022). Lying for Trump? Elite cue-taking and expressive responding on vote method. Public Opinion Quarterly, 86(4), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfac045
47.
StarbirdK.DiRestaR.DeButtsM. (2023). Influence and improvisation: Participatory disinformation during the 2020 US election. Social Media + Society, 9(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177943
48.
VailK. E.IIIHarvell-BowmanL.LockettM.PyszczynskiT.GilmoreG. (2023). Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Motivation and Emotion, 47(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09983-w
49.
von SpakovskyH. A. (2012). Protecting the integrity of the election process. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 11(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2011.11107
50.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
