Underlying the concerns of local election officials about the state of their voting equipment is the notion that voting technology has a substantial impact on the quality of American elections. Voting equipment can quite literally be considered the machinery of democracy. Therefore it is important to understand the relationship between the quality of voting equipment on electoral participation. This paper examines the impact of differences in voting system value on county-level turnout. I argue that investing in voting systems benefits all voters, but especially voters with special needs (like disabled and limited English proficient (LEP) voters). Given the diminished capacity of federal funding provided to localities, there is variability in the amount of resources available to localities to spend on voting equipment. I find evidence suggesting that counties that invest more resources into voting equipment have higher levels of turnout than those that invest less, all else being equal. Higher value voting systems were associated with marginally higher turnout rates for counties with larger proportions of visually disabled and LEP populations.
AcevedoM.KruegerJ. I. (2004). Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: The voter’s illusion and the belief in personal relevance. Political Psychology, 25(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x
2.
AnselinL. (2009). Spatial regression. In The sage handbook of spatial analysis (pp. 255–275): Sage Publications, Ltd.
3.
AnselinL.BeraA. K.FloraxR.YoonM. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(1996), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
4.
AnselinL.ReyS. J. (2014). Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to geoda, geodaspace and pysal. GeoDa Press LLC.
5.
AnsolabehereS.HershE. D. (2017). Adgn: An algorithm for record linkage using address, date of birth, gender, and name. Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2017.1389620
BarretoM. A.MuñozJ. (2003). Re-examinng the politics of in-between: Political participation among mexican immigrants in the united states. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(4), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303258599
8.
BarretoM. A.NuñoS. A.SanchezG. R. (2009). The disproportionate impact of voter-id requirements on the electorate—new evidence from Indiana. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096509090283
9.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
10.
BeltR. (2016). Contemporary voting rights controversies through the lens of disability. Stanford Law Review, 68(6), 1491–1550. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780693
11.
BensonJ. F. (2008). One person, one vote: Protecting access to the franchise through the effective administration of election procedures and protections. The Urban Lawyer, 40(2), 269–297.
12.
BlaisA.YoungR. (1999). Why do people vote? An experiment in rationality. Public Choice, 99(1/2), 39–55.
BradyH. E.McNultyJ. E. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055410000596
15.
BriansC. L.GrofmanB. (1999). When registration barriers fall, who votes? An empirical test of a rational choice model. Public Choice, 99(1), 161–176.
16.
BurdenB. C. (2014). The measure of american elections. In BurdenB. C.StewartIIIC. (Eds.), Chap. Registration and voting: A view from the top. Cambridge University Press.
17.
BurdenB.NeiheiselJ. R. (2013). Election administration and the pure effect of voter registration on turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911430671
18.
BurrisA.FischerE. (2015). Congressional Research Service. The Help America Vote Act and Election Administration: Overview and Selected Issues for the 2016 Election. CRS Report.
19.
CainB.DohertyB. (2006). Transforming politics, transforming America. In LeeT.RamakrishnanK.RamirezR. (Eds.), (p. 89–105). University of Virginia Press.
20.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Disability and health data system (dhds). Retrieved from. https://dhds.cdc.gov/SP
21.
ChoS.-J. (2011). An empirical model of mainframe computer investment. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(1), 122–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1207
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper.
24.
EngleR. F. (1980). Hypothesis testing in spectral regression; the Lagrange multiplier test as a regression diagnostic. In: Evaluation of econometric models (pp. 309–321). Academic Press.
25.
EwaldA. C. (2009). The way we vote: The local dimension of american suffrage. Vanderbilt University Press.
26.
FerejohnJ. A.FiorinaM. P. (1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis. American Political Science Review, 68(2), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959502
27.
FragaB. L.MersethJ. L. (2016). Examining the causal impact of the voting rights act language minority provisions. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 1(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2015.1
28.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.MeredithM.BiggersD. R.HendryD. J. (2017). Does incarceration reduce voting? Evidence about the political consequences of spending time in prison. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1130–1146. https://doi.org/10.1086/692670
29.
GeskeM. J.RameyV. A.ShapiroM. D. (2007). Hard-to-measure goods and services: Essays in honor of zvi griliches. In BerndtE. R.HultenC. R. (Eds.), chap.Why do computers depreciate?Chicago University Press.
30.
GibsonN. S. (2020a). Moving forward or backsliding: A causal inference analysis of the effects of the shelby decision in North Carolina. American Politics Research, 40(5), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x20915235
31.
GibsonN. S. (2020b). Privatized democracy: The role of election services vendors in the United States. American Politics Research, 48(6), 705–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x20920264
32.
GimpelJ. G.DyckJ. J.ShawD. R. (2006). Location, knowledge and time pressures in the spatial structure of convenience voting. Electoral Studies, 25(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.02.002
33.
GriffithD. A. (1987). Spatial autocorrelation: A primer. Association of American Geographers.
HerrnsonP. S.NiemiR. G.HanmerM. J.FranciaP. L.BedersonB. B.ConradF. G.TraugottM. W. (2008). Voters’ evaluations of electronic voting systems: Results from a usability field study. American Politics Research, 36(4), 580–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x08316667
37.
HightonB. (2006). Long lines, voting machine availability, and turnout: The case of franklin county, Ohio in the 2004 presidential election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060148
38.
HillS. A. (2012). Election administration finance in California counties. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011413914
39.
HoodM.BullockC. S. (2008). Worth a thousand words? An analysis of Georgia’s voter identification statute. American Politics Research, 36(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08316608
40.
HopkinsD. J. (2011). Translating into votes: The electoral impacts of Spanish-language ballots. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00534.x
41.
JohnsonA. A.PowellS. (2020). Disability and election administration in the United States: Barriers and improvements. Policy Studies, 41(2-3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1694654
42.
KahnemanD.&TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
43.
KimballD. C.KropfM.MoynihanD. P.SilvaC. L. (2013). Policy views of partisan election officials. The UC Irvine Law Review, 3(3), 551–574.
44.
LevittJ. (2013). ‘fixing that’: Lines at the polling place. The Journal of Law & Politics, 28(4), 465.
45.
McNultyJ. E.DowlingC. M.AriottiM. H. (2009). Driving saints to sin: How increasing the difficulty of voting dissuades even the most motivated voters. Political Analysis, 17(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpp014
46.
MillerS. M. (2013). Administering representation: The role of elected administrators in translating citizens’ preferences into public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 865–897. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus046
47.
MohrZ.PopeJ. V.KropfM. E.ShepherdM. J. (2019). Strategic spending: Does politics influence election administration expenditure?American Journal of Political Science, 63(2), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12422
MoynihanD. P.SilvaC. L. (2008). The administrators of democracy: A research note on local election officials. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00923.x
O’TooleJ.LaurenceJ. (1997). The implications for democracy in a networked bureaucratic world. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(3), 443–459. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024358
ParkinM.ZlotnickF. (2014). The voting rights act and latino voter registration: Symbolic assistance for English-speaking latinos. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 36(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986313511056
58.
PettigrewS. (2017). The racial gap in wait times: Why minority precincts are underserved by local election officials. Political Science Quarterly, 132(3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12657
59.
PettigrewS. (2021). The downstream consequences of long waits: How lines at the precinct depress future turnout. Electoral Studies, 71, Article 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102188
60.
PorterE.RogowsiJ. C. (2018). Partisanship, bureaucratic responsiveness, and election administration: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy025
ReillyS.RicheyS. (2011). Ballot question readability and roll-off: The impact of language complexity. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909349629
63.
RikerW. H.OrdeshookP. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953324
64.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenM. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan.
65.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2
66.
SahuA. K.NarangH. K.SahuA. K.SahuN. K. (2016). Machine economic life estimation based on depreciation-replacement model. Cogent Engineering, 3(1), Article 1249225. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1249225
67.
SchaffnerB.AnsolabehereS.ShihM. (2023). Cooperative election study common content, 2022. Harvard Dataverse. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PR4L8P
68.
ScherR. K. (2011). The politics of disenfranchisement: Why is it so hard to vote in America?Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
69.
SchurL.AmeriM.AdyaM. (2017). Disability, voter turnout, and polling place accessibility. Social Science Quarterly, 98(5), 1374–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12373
70.
SchurL.KruseD. (2014). The measure of american elections. In BurdenB. C.StewartIIIC. (Eds.), Chap. Disability and election policies and practices. Cambridge University Press.
71.
SchurL.ShieldsT.KruseD.SchrinerK. (2002). Enabling democracy: Disability and voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500107
72.
ShawD. R.PetrocikJ. R. (2020). The turnout myth: Voting rates and partisan outcomes in american national elections. Oxford University Press.
SpencerD.MarkovitsZ. (2010). Long lines at polling stations? Observations from an election day field study. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 9(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2009.0046
75.
SquireP.WolfingerR. E.GlassD. P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960778
76.
StewartC.ShawD. R.AnsolabehereS. (2013). 2013 survey of us local election officials.
77.
Tam ChoW. K. (1999). Naturalization, socialization, participation: Immigrants and (non-)voting. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1140–1155.
78.
TuckerJ. T.EspinoR. (2007). Government effectiveness and efficiency? The minority language assistance provisions of the vra. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, 12(2), 164–231.
79.
TullockG. (1967). Toward a mathematics of politics. University of Michigan Press.
United States General Accounting Office. (2001). Voters with disabilities: Access to polling places and alternative voting methods. GAO Report No. GAO-02-107. Retrieved from. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-02-107.pdf
86.
WhiteA.NguyenA. (2022). How often do people vote while incarcerated? Evidence from Maine and Vermont. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 568–572. https://doi.org/10.1086/714927
87.
WolfingerR. E.RosenstoneS. J. (1980). Who votes?. Yale University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
