We analyze fusion candidacies (i.e., minor-party cross-nominations of major-party candidates) in New York congressional elections from 1978 to 2018. In addition to extending our understanding of electoral fusion, our study provides a deeper understanding of the role of minor parties within the American two-party system. We stress two strategic factors that influence the likelihood for cross-nominations: (a) major-party candidate issue positions, and (b) district competitiveness. Our analysis explains both the increased use of fusion over time, as well as cross-candidate variation in cross-nominations.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
2.
AbramsonP. R.AldrichJ. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76(3), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055400188379
3.
AdamsG. D. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111673
4.
BarberM. (2022). Comparing campaign finance and vote-based measures of ideology. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1086/715247
BonicaA. (2014). Mapping the ideological marketplace. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12062
7.
ChamberlainA. (2012). Fusion ballots as a candidate-centered reform: Evidence from Oregon. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2012.07.001
DuvergerM. (1963). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state: Wiley. trans. Barbara North and Robert North.
10.
GrosecloseT.LevittS. D.SnyderJr., J. M. (1999). Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: Adjusted ADA scores for the U.S. Congress. American Political Science Review, 93(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585759
11.
HallR. L.WaymanF. W. (1990). Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 797–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962767
12.
HiranoS. (2008). Third parties, elections, and roll-call votes: The Populist Party and the late nineteenth-century U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33(1), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298008783743282
IyengarS.LelkesY.LevenduskyM.MalhotraN.WestwoodS. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
KallaJ. L.BroockmanD. E. (2016). Campaign contributions facilitate access to congressional officials: A randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12180
17.
KantackB. R. (2017). Fusion and electoral performance in New York congressional elections. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916689823
18.
KarolD. (2009). Party position change in American politics: Coalition management: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KingA. S.LeeD. J. (2023). Permeable boundaries: The interplay between major party primary and non-major party candidacies. Party Politics, 29(4), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221089814
20.
KselmanD.NiouE. (2011). Protest voting in plurality elections: A theory of voter signaling. Public Choice, 148(3-4), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9661-2
21.
LeeD. J. (2012). Anticipating entry: Major party positioning and third party threat. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910391476
22.
LeeD. J. (2014). Third-party threat and the dimensionality of major-party roll call voting. Public Choice, 159(3-4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0066-x
23.
LeeD. J.GoffS. (2019). Prospects for third party electoral success in a polarized era. American Politics Research, 47(6), 1324–1344.
24.
LeeD. J.SchutteR. A. (2017). Elite-level issue dynamics: Assessing perspectives on party issue change. Party Politics, 23(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815588258
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2008). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches: MIT Press.
27.
PalfreyT. (1984). Spatial equilibrium with entry. Review of Economic Studies, 51(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297710
28.
PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2007). Ideology and congress. Transaction Publishers.
29.
RapoportR. B.StoneW. J. (2008). Three’s a crowd: The dynamic of third parties, Ross Perot, and republican resurgence. University of Michigan Press.
30.
RosenstoneS. J.BehrR. L.LazarusE. H. (1996). Third parties in America: Citizen response to major party failure (2nd ed.): Princeton University Press.
31.
ScarrowH. A. (1986). Duverger’s law, fusion, and the decline of American “third” parties. The Western Political Quarterly, 39(4), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298603900405
32.
SoyerD. (2021). Left in the center: The liberal party of New York and the rise and fall of American social democracy. Cornell University Press.
33.
SpitzerR. J. (1987). The Right to life movement and third party politics. Greenwood Press.
34.
SteelmanT.GrayV. (2020). I choose you! Interest group endorsements in the 2018 U.S. House midterm elections. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 9(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-020-00088-8
35.
TamasB. (2017). Does fusion undermine American third parties? An analysis of House elections from 1870 to 2016. New Political Science, 39(4), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1378294
36.
TheriaultS. M. (2006). Party polarization in congress. Cambridge University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
