Using an original dataset, we offer an intersectional exploration of psychological violence, threats, and physical violence against U.S. mayors in 2021 in cities of 10,000+ in population. We also explore violence that is gendered and raced. Overall, we find significant and meaningful differences among gender/race groups. Women of color and non-Hispanic white women faced higher rates of threats, gendered, and sexualized violence than men, and women of color were the only mayors to report heightened levels of gendered and raced violence. Non-Hispanic white women mayors were distinctive in that they reported higher levels of psychological violence, including being criticized for their appearance and perceptions that they were too emotional, but were least likely to be called sexist. These findings suggest that there are race- and gender-based costs of holding office. If so, the effects on democratic representation and the benefits from representational diversity will be forfeited.
BardallG.BjarnegårdE.PiscopoJ. M. (2020). How is political violence gendered? Disentangling motives, forms, and impacts. Political Studies, 68(4), 916–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719881812
BarnelloM. A.BrattonK. A. (2007). Bridging the gender gap in bill sponsorship. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(3), 449–474. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007781699645
4.
BeckS. A. (1991). Rethinking municipal governance: Gender distinctions on local councils. In Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 103–113). Center for American Women in Politics.
5.
BedollaL. G. (2007). Intersections of inequality: Understanding marginalization and privilege in the post-civil rights era. Politics and Gender, 3(2), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x07000050
6.
BerdahlJ. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351879
7.
BiroliF. (2018). Violence against women and reactions to gender equality in politics. Politics and Gender, 14(4), 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x18000600
8.
BjarnegårdE. (2018). Making gender visible in election violence: Strategies for data collection. Politics and Gender, 14(4), 690–695.
9.
BolesJ. K. (2001). Local elected women and policy-making. The impact of women in public office. Indiana University press.
10.
BrattonK. A.HaynieK. L. (1999). Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647822
11.
BrescollV. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994
12.
BrescollV. L.OkimotoT. G.VialA. C. (2018). You’ve come a long way… maybe: How moral emotions trigger backlash against women leaders. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12261
13.
BrownN. E. (2013). Employing intersectionality: The impact of generation on black women Maryland state legislators’ views on anti-domestic violence legislation. The Journal of Race & Policy, 9(1), 47.
14.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (2020). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton University Press.
15.
CollignonS.RüdigW. (2020). Harassment and intimidation of parliamentary candidates in the United Kingdom. The Political Quarterly, 91(2), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.12855
16.
CrenshawK. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). Routledge.
17.
CrowB. A. (1997). Relative privilege? Reconsidering white women’s participation in municipal politics. In Women transforming politics: An alternative reader (pp. 435–446). New York University Press.
18.
DeliovskyK. (2008). Normative white femininity: Race, gender and the politics of beauty. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 33(1), 49–59.
19.
DillmanD. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method--2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. John Wiley & Sons.
20.
DodsonD. L. (2006). The impact of women in Congress. OUP.
21.
DodsonD. L.CarrollS. J. (1991). Reshaping the agenda: Women in state legislatures: Report. Center for the American Woman and Politics (CAWP) Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
22.
DoviS. (2002). Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black, or Latino do?American Political Science Review, 96(4), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000412
ElazarD. (1966). American federalism: A view from the States. Crowell.
25.
EriksonJ.HåkanssonS.JosefssonC. (2021). Three dimensions of gendered online abuse: Analyzing Swedish MPs’ experiences of social media. Perspectives on Politics, 21(3), 1–17.
26.
GarzaA. (2020). The purpose of power: How we come together when we fall apart. One World.
27.
GershonS. A.MontoyaC.BejaranoC.BrownN. (2019). Intersectional linked fate and political representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1639520
28.
HåkanssonS. (2021). Do women pay a higher price for power? Gender bias in political violence in Sweden. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 515–531.
29.
HåkanssonS. (2023). Violence against Swedish local level politicians in gender and violence against political actors. In BjarnegårdE.ZetterbergP. (Eds.), gender and violence against political actors. Temple University Press.
30.
HananiaR. (2017). The personalities of politicians: A big five survey of American legislators. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.020
31.
HancockA. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592707070065
32.
HancockA. M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press.
33.
Hardy-FantaC. (2013). Intersectionality and politics: Recent research on gender, race, and political representation in the United States. Routledge.
34.
Hardy-FantaC.PinderhughesD.SierraC. M. (2016). Contested transformation. Cambridge University Press.
35.
HerrickR.FranklinL. D. (2019). Is it safe to keep this job? The costs of violence on the psychological health and careers of US mayors. Social Science Quarterly, 100(6), 2047–2058. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12713
36.
HerrickR.ThomasS. (2022a). Not just sticks and stones: Psychological abuse and physical violence among US state senators. Politics and Gender, 18(2), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x2000063x
37.
HerrickR.ThomasS. (2022b). Violence among state house candidates during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 47(3), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12361
38.
HerrickR.ThomasS.BartholomyK. (2022). Gender, power, and colleague aggression in US state senates. Political Research Quarterly, 75(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920985313
39.
HerrickR.ThomasS.FranklinL.GodwinM. L.GnabasikE.SchroedelJ. R. (2019). Physical violence and psychological abuse against female and male mayors in the United States. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(4), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629321
40.
HolmM. (2020). Violence against women in politics: Emerging perspectives, new challenges. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3(2), 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510820x15808264127039
41.
HolmanM. R. (2014a). Sex and the city: Female leaders and spending on social welfare programs in US municipalities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(4), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12066
42.
HolmanM. R. (2014). Women in politics in the American city. Temple University Press.
JunnJ.BrownN. (2008). What revolution? Incorporating intersectionality in women and politics. Political Women and American Democracy, Cambridge University press. 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790621.007
46.
KahnK. F.FridkinK. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. Columbia University Press.
47.
KathleneL. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944795
48.
KeyS.PopkinS.MunchusG.WechB.HillV.TannerJ. (2012). An exploration of leadership experiences among white women and women of color. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811211228111
KrookM. L.Restrepo SanínJ. (2016). Gender and political violence in Latin America. Concepts, debates and solutions. Politica y Gobierno, 23(1), 127–162.
MangumM. (2013). The racial underpinnings of party identification and political ideology. Social Science Quarterly, 94(5), 1222–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12029
54.
MansbridgeJ. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent” yes. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821
55.
MansbridgeJ.ShamesS. L. (2008). Toward a theory of backlash: Dynamic resistance and the central role of power. Politics and Gender, 4(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x08000500
56.
MartinezM. (2022). US black women state legislators: Intersectional identities and education policies. Race Ethnicity and Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2022.2088723.
57.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
58.
MezeyS. G. (1978). Women and representation: The case of Hawaii. The Journal of Politics, 40(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130092
59.
MillerM. G.SutherlandJ. L. (2022). The effect of gender on interruptions at congressional hearings. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000260
60.
NownesA. J.FreemanP. K. (2019). Gender-based differences in information use and processing among state legislators. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 40(4), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2019.1614866
61.
OkimotoT. G.BrescollV. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949
62.
PhillipsA. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford University Press.
63.
PiscopoJ. M.BjarnegårdE. (Forthcoming, 2023). Locating politics and gender within the violent act in gender and violence against political actors. In BjarnegårdE.ZetterbergP. (Eds.), In press, gender and violence against political actors. Temple University Press.
64.
PitkinH. F. (1967) The concept of representation (Vol. 75). Univ of California Press.
65.
PurtleJ.Lê-ScherbanF.WangX.BrownE.ChiltonM. (2019). State legislators’ opinions about adverse childhood experiences as risk factors for adult behavioral health conditions. Psychiatric Services, 70(10), 894–900. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900175
66.
ReingoldB.WidnerK.HarmonR. (2020). Legislating at the intersections: Race, gender, and representation. Political Research Quarterly, 73(4), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919858405
67.
SanbonmatsuK. (2015). Why not a woman of color? The candidacies of US women of color for statewide executive office.
68.
Sanchez-HuclesJ. V.DavisD. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist, 65(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017459
69.
SmoothW. (2011). Standing for women? Which women? The substantive representation of women's interests and the research imperative of intersectionality. Politics and Gender, 7(3), 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x11000225
70.
SmoothW. G. (2013). Intersectionality from theoretical framework to policy intervention. Situating intersectionality: Politics, policy, and power, (pp. 11–41): Palgrave Macmillian Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025135_2
71.
SwainK. E.LienP. T. (2017). Structural and contextual factors regarding the accessibility of elective office for women of color at the local level. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2016.1198653
72.
SwersM. L. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. University of Chicago Press.
ThomasS. (1994). How women legislate. Oxford University Press on Demand.
75.
ThomasS. (2002). The personal is the political: Antecedents of gendered choices of elected representatives. Sex Roles, 47(7/8), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021431114955
76.
ThomasS.HerrickR. (2023). Physical and psychological violence among U.S. Mayors and State Senators. In gender and violence against political actors. Elin Bjarnegård and Pär Zetterberg. Temple University Press.
77.
ThomasS.HerrickR.FranklinL. D.GodwinM. L.GnabasikE.SchroedelJ. R. (2019). Not for the faint of heart: Assessing physical violence and psychological abuse against US mayors. State and Local Government Review, 51(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x19858133
78.
Tolleson-RinehartS. (2001). Do women leaders make a difference? Substance, style and perceptions. The impact of women in public office, 17(23), 129.
79.
WeikartL. A.ChenG.WilliamsD. W.HromicH. (2007). The democratic sex: Gender differences and the exercise of power. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(1), 119–140.
80.
WinterN. J. (2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
81.
YoungI. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
