The mayor’s office potentially offers a launchpad for statewide and national political ambitions. We know relatively little, however, about how frequently mayors actually run for higher office, and which mayors choose to do so. This article combines longitudinal data on the career paths of the mayors of 200 big cities with new survey and interview data to investigate these questions. While we find that individual and city traits—especially gender—have some predictive power, the overwhelming story is that relatively few mayors—just under one-fifth—ever seek higher office. We suggest that ideological, institutional, and electoral factors all help to explain why so few mayors exhibit progressive ambition.
BanfieldE. C.WilsonJ. Q. (1963). City politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BlackG. S. (1972). A theory of political ambition: Career choices and the role of structural incentives. American Political Science Review, 66, 144-159.
3.
BledsoeT. (1993). Careers in city politics: The case for democracy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
4.
BrooksL.PhillipsJ. H. (2010). An institutional explanation for the stickiness of federal grants. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26(2), 243-264.
5.
ButlerD. M.PreeceJ. R. (2016). Recruitment and perceptions of gender bias in party leader support. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 842-851.
CanonD. T. (1990). Sacrificial lambs or strategic politics? Political amateurs in U.S. elections. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
ConstantiniE. (1990). Political women and political ambition: Closing the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 741-770.
9.
Crowder-MeyerM. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9, 390-413.
10.
EinsteinK.KoganV. (2016). Pushing the city limits: Policy responsiveness in municipal government. Urban Affairs Review, 52, 33-65.
11.
EulauH.PrewittK. (1973). Labyrinths of democracy: Adaptations, linkages, representation, and policies in urban politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
12.
FisherS.HerrickR. (2013). Old versus new: The comparative efficiency of mail and Internet surveys of state legislators. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 13, 147-163.
13.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2005). To run or not to run for office: Explaining nascent political ambition. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 642-659.
14.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2010). If only they’d ask: Gender, recruitment, and political ambition. Journal of Politics, 72, 310-336.
15.
FrugG. E. (1980). The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Review, 93, 1057-1154.
16.
FultonS. A.MaestasC. D.MaiselL. S.StoneW. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender and congressional ambition. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 235-248.
17.
GaddieR. K. (2004). Born to run: Origins of the political career. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
GammG.KousserT. (2013). No strength in numbers: The failure of big-city bills in American state legislatures, 1880-2000. American Political Science Review, 107, 663-678.
19.
GerberE. R.HopkinsD. J. (2011). When mayors matter: Estimating the impact of mayoral partisanship on city policy. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 326-339.
20.
GittellM. (1963). Metropolitan mayor: Dead end. Public Administration Review, 23, 20-24.
21.
HainP. L. (1974). Age, ambitions, and political careers: The middle-age crisis. Western Political Quarterly, 27, 265-274.
22.
HainP. L. (1976). Constituency characteristics, political ambition, and advancement. Western Political Quarterly, 4, 47-62.
HardenJ. (2013). Multidimensional responsiveness: The determinants of legislators’ representational priorities. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38, 155-184.
25.
HochschildJ. L.WeaverV. M.BurchT. R. (2012). Creating a new racial order: How immigration, multiracialism, genomics and the young can remake race in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
JuddD. R.SwanstromT. (2014). City politics (9th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
27.
KaufmannK. M. (2004). The urban voter: Group conflict and mayoral voting behavior in American cities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28.
KazeeT. A. (1994). The emergence of congressional candidates. In KazeeT. A. (Ed.), Who runs for congress? Ambition, context, and candidate emergence. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
29.
LawlessJ. L. (2012). Becoming a candidate: Political ambition and the decision to run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LawlessJ. L.FoxR. L. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LerouxK.PandeyS. K. (2014). City managers, career incentives, and municipal service decisions: The effects of managerial progressive ambition on interlocal service delivery. Public Administration Review, 71, 627-636.
32.
MaestasC. D. (2000). Professional legislatures and ambitious politicians: Policy responsiveness of individuals and institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 773-793.
33.
MaestasC. D. (2003). The incentive to listen: Progressive ambition, resources and opinion monitoring among state legislators. Journal of Politics, 65, 439-456.
34.
MaestasC. D.FultonS. A.MaiselL. S.StoneW. J. (2006). When to risk it? Institutions, ambitions, and the decision to run for the U.S. house. American Political Science Review, 100, 195-208.
35.
MaiselL. S.StoneW. J. (2014). Candidate emergence revisited: The lingering effects of recruitment, ambition, and successful prospects among house candidates. Political Science Quarterly, 129, 429-447.
36.
MatthewsD. R. (1984). Legislative recruitment and legislative careers. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 9, 547-585.
37.
McNittA. D. (2010). Tenure in office of big city mayors. State & Local Government Review, 42, 36-47.
38.
MollenkopfJ. H. (1994). A phoenix in the ashes: The rise and fall of the Koch coalition in New York City politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
MoncriefG. F.SquireP.JewellM. E. (2001). Who runs for the legislature?Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
MurphyR. D. (1980). Whither the mayors? A note on mayoral careers. The Journal of Politics, 42, 277-290.
PetersonP. (1981). City limits. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
PowellR. J. (2000). The impact of term limits on the candidacy decisions of state legislators in U.S. house elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 645-661.
44.
PreeceJ. R. (2016). Mind the gender gap: The influence of self-efficacy on political interest. Politics & Gender, 12, 198-217.
45.
PreeceJ. R.StoddardO. B.FisherR. (2016). Run, Jane, run! The gender gap in responses to political party recruitment. Political Behavior, 38, 561-577. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9,327-3
46.
RohdeD. W. (1979). Risk-bearing and progressive ambition: The case of members of the United States House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 1-26.
47.
SchlesingerJ. (1966). Ambition and politics: Political careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
48.
ShorB.McCartyN. (2011). The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review, 105, 530-551.
49.
SonensheinR. J. (1993). Race and power in Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
SoraufFrank J. (1980). Party Politics in America, 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
51.
SteenJ. A. (2006). The impact of state legislative term limits on the supply of congressional candidates. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 6, 430-447.
52.
StewartC. H.III. (2012). Analyzing congress (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
53.
TausanovitchC.WarshawC. (2014). Representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review, 108, 605-641.
54.
TheriaultS. M. (1998). Moving up or moving out: Career ceilings and congressional retirement. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23, 419-433.
55.
ThomasS. (1990). Sacrificial lambs or strategic politics? Political amateurs in U.S. elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
TotheroR. A. (2003). The impact of term limits on state legislators’ ambition for local office: The case of Michigan’s house. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 33, 111-122.
57.
VigdorJ. L. (2004). Other people’s taxes: Nonresident voters and statewide limitation of local government. The Journal of Law & Economics, 47, 453-476.
58.
WilsonJ. Q. (1962). The amateur democrat: Club politics in three cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
