The anti-LGBTQ politics of the Religious Right has been implicated as one of the critical forces promoting the rise of disaffiliation from religion. The association seems plain given the rapid rise of the nones among younger cohorts of Americans – a group which also holds the most pro-LGBTQ attitudes. However, little work actually tests the link between shifting attitudes on same-sex marriage and declining religious behavior and affiliation. Drawing on the Portraits of American Life Panel study with waves in 2006 and 2012, we use appropriate measures to document the religious effects of changing views on same-sex marriage. We find that while shifting views did have a negative effect on church attendance and affiliation, these effects were not limited to shifts toward support for same-sex marriage and were not limited to liberals.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley
2.
BakerJ. O.SmithB. (2009). None too simple: Examining issues of religious nonbelief and nonbelonging in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01475.x
3.
BeckerA. B. (2012). Determinants of public support for same-sex marriage: Generational cohorts, social contact, and shifting attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(4), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds002
4.
BramlettB. H. (2012). The cross-pressure of religion and contact with gays and lesbians, and their impact on same-sex marriage opinion. Politics & Policy, 40(1), 13–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00337.x
5.
BrennerP. S. (2019). Sexuality, political polarization, and survey reports of religious nonaffiliation. Politics and Religion, 12(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048318000433
CampbellD. E.LaymanG. C.GreenJ. C. (2021). Secular surge: A new fault line in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
8.
ClarkeH. D.McCutcheonA. L. (2009). The dynamics of party identification reconsidered. British Journal of Political Science, 73(4), 704–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp051
DjupeP. A.NeiheiselJ. R. (2019). Political mobilization in American congregations: A religious economies perspective. Politics and Religion, 12(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048318000512
11.
DjupeP. A.NeiheiselJ. R.CongerK. H. (2018). Are the politics of the christian right linked to state rates of the nonreligious? The importance of salient controversy. Political Research Quarterly, 71(4), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918771526
12.
DjupeP. A.NeiheiselJ. R.SokheyA. E. (2018). Reconsidering the role of politics in leaving congregations: The importance of affiliation. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12308
13.
EvelandW. P.ThomsonT. (2006). Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00299.x
14.
FinkelS. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data (sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage
15.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.WashingtonE. (2010). Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 720–744. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055410000407
16.
GorenP.ChappC. (2017). Moral power: How public opinion on culture war issues shapes partisan predispositions and religious orientations. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000435
17.
HoutM.FischerC. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088891
18.
HoutM.FischerC. S. (2014). Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: Political backlash and generational succession, 1987-2012. Sociological Science, 1(24), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.15195/v1.a24
19.
JonesR. P. (2016). The end of white Christian America. Simon and Schuster
20.
KreitzerR. J.HamiltonA. J.TolbertC. J. (2014). Does policy adoption change opinions on minority rights? The effects of legalizing same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914540483
21.
LeeH.MutzD. C. (2019). Changing attitudes toward same-sex marriage: A three-wave panel study. Political Behavior, 41(3), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9463-7
22.
LewisA. R. (2017). The rights turn in conservative Christian politics: How abortion transformed the culture wars. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108278171
MerinoS. M. (2013). Contact with gays and lesbians and same-sex marriage support: The moderating role of social context. Social Science Research, 42(4), 1156–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.02.004
PutnamR. D.CampbellD. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. Simon and Schuster
27.
VargasN. (2012). Retrospective accounts of religious disaffiliation in the United States: Stressors, skepticism, and political factors. Sociology of Religion, 73(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srr044
28.
WaldK. D.OwenD. E.HillS. S. (1988). Churches as political communities. American Political Science Review, 82(2), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957399
29.
WhiteheadA. L. (2017). Institutionalized norms, practical organizational activity, and loose coupling: Inclusive congregations’ responses to homosexuality. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(4), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12484
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
