We examine whether votes on minority rights make the public less sympathetic to the targeted group. Panel data are used to test whether votes on marriage changed public attitudes about gays and lesbians. We propose the marriage debate had a stigmatizing effect on attitudes about gays and lesbians in states where marriage was on the ballot. Results reveal a conditional relationship. Religious people in states where marriage was voted on had lower affect for gays and lesbians after the campaign. Independent of policy outcomes, subjecting a minority group to public judgment about rights may promote animus toward the group.
BartelsLarry. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review87 (2): 267–85.
3.
BourneJonathan. 1912. “Initiative, Referendum and Recall.” Atlantic Monthly109 (January): 125–26.
4.
BowlerShaunNicholsonStephenSeguraGary. 2006. “Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Race, Direct Democracy and Partisan Change.” American Journal of Political Science50 (1): 146–59.
5.
BrantonReginaJonesBrad S.2005. “Reexamining Racial Attitudes: The Conditional Relationship between Diversity and Socioeconomic Environment.” American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 359–72.
6.
BrewerPaulWilcoxClyde. 2005. “Same Sex Marriage and Civil Unions.” Public Opinion Quarterly69 (4): 599–616.
7.
CampbellDavid E.MonsonJ. Quin. 2008. “The Religion Card: Gay Marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (3): 399–419.
8.
CampbellDonald T.StanleyJulian C.1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review74 (1): 78–91.
10.
ChavezLydia. 1998. The Color Bind: California’s Battle to End Affirmative Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
ConversePhilip. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly26 (4): 578–99.
12.
ConversePhilip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterD., 206–61. New York: Free Press.
13.
CraigStephen C.MartinezMichael D.KaneJames G.2005. “Core Values, Value Conflict and Ambivalence about Gay Rights.” Political Research Quarterly58 (1): 5–17.
14.
CronbachLee J.FurbyLita. 1970. “How Should We Measure Change—or Should We?” Psychological Bulletin74:68–80.
15.
CroninThomas. 1987. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16.
DonovanToddTolbertCarolineSmithDaniel A.2008. “Priming Presidential Votes by Direct Democracy.” Journal of Politics70 (4): 1217–31.
17.
DouglasDavid. 1997. “Taking the Initiative: Anti-Homosexual Propaganda of the Oregon Citizen’s Alliance.” In Anti-Gay Rights: Assessing Voter Initiatives, edited by WittS.McCorkleS.Westport: Praeger.
18.
DyckJoshuaLascherEdward. 2009. “Direct Democracy and Political Efficacy Reconsidered.” Political Behavior31 (3): 401–27.
19.
GambleBarbara. 1997. “Putting Civil Rights to a Vote.” American Journal of Political Science41 (1): 154–77.
20.
GamsonWilliam A.ModiglianiAndre. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology95 (1): 1–37.
21.
GeerJohn. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GerberElisabethLupiaArthurMcCubbinsMathewKiewietD. Roderick. 2001. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
23.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.QuerzeAlanaLindamanKara. 2007. “Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.” Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 304–14.
24.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.JoslynMark. 2005. “Attitudes about the Regulation of Marriage: Considering the Parallels between Race and Homosexuality.” Political Science and Politics38 (2): 233–9.
25.
HajnalZoltanGerberElisabethLouchHugh. 2003. “Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections.” Journal of Politics64 (1): 154–77.
26.
HerekGregory M.2002. “Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men.” Public Opinion Quarterly66 (1): 40–66.
27.
HolbrookThomas M.1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
28.
HoSangDaniel. 2010. Racial Propositions: Ballot Initiatives and the Making of Postwar California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
JenningsM KentMarkusGregory. 1977. “The Effects of Military Service on Political Attitudes: A Panel Study.” American Political Science Review71 (1): 131–47.
30.
KeyValdimer Orlando. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
31.
KinderDonald R.SandersLynn M.1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2009. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review103 (3): 367–86.
33.
LewisGregory B.2003. “Black-White Differences in Attitudes toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights.” Public Opinion Quarterly67 (1): 59–78.
34.
Loftus, 2001. “America’s Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973–1998.” American Sociological Review66 (5): 762–82.
35.
LongJ ScottFreeseJeremy. 2005. Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes Using Stata. 2nd ed.College Station: Stata Press.
36.
MarcossonSamuel. 1995. “The ‘Special Rights’ Canard in the Debate over Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy9:137–83.
37.
MarkusGregory. 1979. Analyzing Panel Data (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Beverly Hills: SAGE.
38.
MendelbergTali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
NicholsonStephen P.2003. “The Political Environment and Ballot Proposition Awareness.” American Journal of Political Science47 (3): 403–10.
40.
NicholsonStephen P.2005. Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections, and Ballot Propositions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
PageBenjaminShapiroRobertDempsey. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?” American Political Science Review81 (1): 23–44.
42.
ReevesKeith. 1997. Voting Hopes or Fears? White Voters, Black Candidates and Racial Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
SmithDanielTolbertCaroline. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48.
SmithMark. 2001. “The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science45 (3): 700–6.
49.
SnidermanPaulPiazzaThomas. 1993. The Scar of Race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
50.
StoufferSamuel. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.
51.
TolbertCarolineGrummelJohn. 2003. “White Voter Support for California’s Proposition 209: Revisiting the Racial Threat Hypothesis.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly3 (2): 183–202.
52.
TolbertCarolineHeroRodney. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 851–71.
53.
WenzelJamesDonovanToddBowlerShaun. 1998. “Direct Democracy and Minorities: Chancing Attitudes about Minorities Targeted by Initiatives.” In Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States, edited by BowlerShaunDonovanToddTolbertCaroline, 167–87. Columbus: Ohio University State Press.
54.
WhiteheadAndrew. 2010. “Sacred Rites and Civil Rights: Religion’s Effect on Attitudes toward Same-Sex Unions and the Perceived Cause of Homosexuality.” Social Science Quarterly91 (1): 63–79.
55.
WilcoxClydeSigelmanLeeCookElizabeth. 1989. “Some Like It Hot: Individual Differences in Responses to Group Feeling Thermometers.” Public Opinion Quarterly53 (2): 246–57.
