Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What factors do people most associate with the partisan identity of others: group identity, political issue positions, or social behaviors? In this research note, we report the results of a conjoint experiment in which we test the predictive power of descriptive identities against other attributes such as social behaviors and issue positions. We find that when presented with a randomized biography to predict partisanship, people rely on issue positions over descriptive group identities or behaviors. Most issues outperform group affiliations and behaviors, with sexual orientation as the partial exception. We then compared these results to the correlation between the same factors in respondents’ own biographies and their own partisan identification. We find that political issues are far less important to people’s own partisan affiliations, while group identity is more predictive. We conclude that an understanding or perception of ideological concepts and their association with the political parties in others should be distinguished from adoption of such concepts by individuals themselves.

Keywords

partisanship conjoint analysis issues group affiliations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

C. H.

Bartels

L. M.

(2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.

Campbell

Converse

P. E.

Miller

W. E.

Stokes

D. E.

(1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.

Converse

(1964). Ideology and discontent. Chapter the nature of belief systems in mass publics.

Costa

(forthcoming). Ideology, not affect: What Americans want from political representa- Tion. American Jounal of Political Science.

Fowler

(2020). Partisan intoxication or policy voting? Quarterly Journal of Political Sci- Ence, 15(2), 141–179. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00018027a

Goggin

Henderson

J. A.

Alexander

. 2020. “What goes with red and blue? Mapping partisan and ideological associations in the minds of voters.” Political Behavior 42(4), 985–1013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09525-6

Hetherington

Weiler

(2018). Prius or pickup?: How the answers to four simple questions explain America’s great divide. Houghton Mifflin.

Huddy

Mason

Aarøe

(2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involve- ment, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000604

Kinder

D. R.

Kalmoe

N. P.

(2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological inno- cence in the American public. University of Chicago Press.

10.

Mason

(2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.

11.

Orr

L. V.

Huber

G. A.

(2019). The policy basis of measured partisan animosity in the United States. American Jounal of Political Science, 64(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12498

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB