Party Differences in Support for Government Spending,1973-2014

Abstract

Willingness to support funding for government programs, particularly social programs, has been a key difference between Democrats and Republicans since the New Deal era. In recent years, considerable research has pointed to increasing differences between partisans. The current research uses General Social Survey data from 1973 to 2014 to examine the extent to which differences between Democrats and Republicans on spending issues have increased over time, have been consistent across domains, or have fluctuated differentially during this period. The results demonstrate that while Democrats and Republicans have distinct and opposing views on questions of government spending, partisan differences in support for spending are not uniform across issue areas, with larger differences on social welfare issues than on issues that are seen as redistributive, but not entitlements. The changes in liberalism that have occurred among partisans on these issues vary across domains and fluctuate at various points during this 40-year period.

Keywords

government spending issue differences partisanship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

A. I.

(2010). The disappearing center. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Abramowitz

A. I.

(2011, September 1-4). Party polarization and the rise of the tea party movement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

Abramowitz

A. I.

Saunders

K. L.

(2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70, 542-555.

Bafumi

Shapiro

R. Y.

(2009). A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics, 71, 1-24.

Baldassarri

Gelman

(2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 408-446.

Baldassarri

Park

(2016, September 3). Was there a culture war? Polarization and secular trends in US public opinion. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.

Berke

R. L.

(1989, September 12). Poll finds most in U.S. back Bush strategy on drugs. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/12/us/poll-finds-most-in-us-back-bush-strategy-on-drugs.html?pagewanted=all

Dionne

E. J.

(1988, May 24). Drugs as 1988 issue: Filling a vacuum. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/24/us/drugs-as-1988-issue-filling-a-vacuum.html

Erskine

(1971). The polls: The politics of age. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35, 482-495.

10.

Fiorina

M. P.

(2013, March 11). Polarized or sorted? Just what’s wrong with our politics, anyway? The American Interest. Retrieved from http://www.the-american-interest.com////polarized-or-sorted-just-whats-wrong-with-our-politics-anyway/20130311

11.

Fiorina

M. P.

Abrams

S. J.

(2015). Americans are not polarized, just better sorted. In Hopkins

D. J.

Sides

(Eds.), Political polarization in American politics. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. 41-46.

12.

Fiorina

M. P.

Abrams

S. J.

Pope

J. C.

(2006). Culture war: The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

13.

Fiorina

M. P.

Abrams

S. J.

Pope

J. C.

(2008). Polarization in the American electorate: Misconceptions and misreadings. Journal of Politics, 70, 556-560.

14.

Free

L. A.

Cantril

(1968). The political beliefs of Americans: A study of public opinion. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

15.

Gelman

Park

Shor

Bafumi

Cortina

(2008). Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state: Why Americans vote the way they do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

16.

Goren

(2003). Race, sophistication, and white opinion on government spending. Political Behavior, 25, 201-220.

17.

Goren

(2008). The two faces of government spending. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 147-157.

18.

Han

Brady

D. W.

(2007). A delayed return to historical norms: Congressional party polarization after the second world war. British Journal of Political Science, 37, 501-531.

19.

Hetherington

M. J.

(2009). Review article: Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 413-448.

20.

Hetherington

M. J.

Long

M. T.

Rudolph

T. J.

(2016). Revisiting the myth: New evidence of a polarized electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 321-350.

21.

Hunter

J. D.

(1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.

22.

Jacoby

W. G.

(1994). Public attitudes toward government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 336-361.

23.

Jacoby

W. G.

(2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750-767.

24.

Jacoby

W. G.

(2008). Comment: The dimensionality of public attitudes toward government spending. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 158-161.

25.

Jacoby

W. G.

(2014). Is there a culture war? Conflicting value structures in American public opinion. American Political Science Review, 108, 754-771.

26.

Jones

J. M.

(2010, June 17). In U.S., economy, oil spill rank as most important problem. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/140774/economy-oil-spill-rank-important-problems.aspx

27.

Lambries

D. N.

Oldendick

R. W.

Werner

Self

(2012, May 19). Are we really that liberal? Evidence from the general social survey spending items. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Orlando, FL.

28.

Layman

G. C.

Carsey

T. M.

Horowitz

J. M.

(2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83-110.

29.

Levendusky

(2009). The partisan sort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

30.

Levy

S. G.

(1972). Polarization in racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 221-234.

31.

McCarty

Poole

Rosenthal

(2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

32.

Miller

W. E.

(1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to basics. American Political Science Review, 85, 557-568.

33.

Pew Center for the People and the Press. (2011, February 10). Fewer want spending to grow, but most cuts remain unpopular. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2011/02/10/fewer-want-spending-to-grow-but-most-cuts-remain-unpopular/

34.

Rasmussen

Schoen

(2010). Mad as hell: How the tea party movement is fundamentally remaking our two-party system. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

35.

Sears

D. O.

Citrin

(1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

36.

Skocpol

Williamson

(2012). The tea party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

37.

Smith

A. E.

Tuchfarber

A. J.

Rademacher

E. W.

Bennett

S. E.

(1995, October/November). Partisan leaners are not independents. The Public Perspective, 6, 9-12.

38.

Smith

T. W.

(2011). Trends in national spending priorities, 1973-2010. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.

39.

Smith

T. W.

(2015). General social survey trend report: Trends in national spending priorities, 1973-2014. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.

40.

Smith

T. W.

Marsden

P. V.

Hout

(2016). General social surveys, 1972-2014. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.

41.

Stimson

J. A.

(1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

42.

Ura

J. D.

Ellis

C. R.

(2012). Partisan moods: Polarization and the dynamics of mass party preferences. Journal of Politics, 74, 277-291.

43.

Weisberg

H. E.

(1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 2, 33-60.

44.

Wlezien

(2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with “most important problem.” Electoral Studies, 23, 555-579.