No Balance,No Problem: Evidence of Partisan Voting in the 2021 Georgia U.S. Senate Runoffs

Abstract

Recent work on American presidential elections suggests that voters engage in anticipatory balancing, which occurs when voters split their ticket in order to moderate collective policy outcomes by forcing agreement among institutions controlled by opposing parties. We use the 2021 Georgia U.S. Senate runoffs, which determined whether Democrats would have unified control of the federal government given preceding November victories by President-elect Biden and House Democrats, to evaluate support for anticipatory balancing. Leveraging an original survey of Georgia voters, we find no evidence of balancing within the general electorate and among partisans across differing model specifications. We use qualitative content analysis of voter electoral runoff intentions to support our findings and contextualize the lack of evidence for balancing withan original analysis showing the unprecedented partisan nature of contemporary Senate elections since direct-election began in 1914.

Keywords

electoral balancing policy balancing voter electoral knowledge partisanship nationalized elections

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

Webster

(2015). All politics is national: The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. House and senate elections in the 21 st century”.

Alesina

Fiorina

M. P.

Rosenthal

(1991). Why are there so many divided senate delegations?

Alesina

Rosenthal

(1995). Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy. Cambridge University Press.

Algara

(2019). The conditioning role of polarization in U.S. senate election outcomes: A direct-election & voter-level analysis. Electoral Studies, 59(complete), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.006.

Algara

Johnston

(2021). The rising electoral role of polarization implications for policymaking in the United States senate: Assessing the consequences of polarization in the senate from 1914-2020. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics.

Alvarez

R. M.

Atkeson

L. R.

Levin

(2019). Paying attention to inattentive survey respondents. Political Analysis, 27(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.57.

Alvarez

R. M.

Schousen

M. M.

(1993). Testing the intentional models of split-ticket voting. American Politics Quarterly, 21(4), 410–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x9302100402.

Aronow

P. M.

Kalla

Orr

Ternovski

(2020). Evidence of rising rates of inattentiveness on Lucid in 2020”.

Bafumi

Erikson

R. S.

Wlezien

(2010). Balancing, generic polls and midterm congressional elections. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000113.

10.

Bafumi

Shapiro

R. Y.

(2009). A new partisan voter. The Journal of Politics, 71(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608090014.

11.

Bailey

M. A.

Fullmer

E. B.

(2011). Balancing in the U.S. States, 1978-2009. State Politics Policy Quarterly, 11(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440011406230.

12.

Bartels

L. M.

(2000). Partisanship and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669291.

13.

Beck

P. A.

Baum

Clausen

A. R.

Smith

C. E.

(1992). Patterns and sources of ticket splitting in subpresidential voting. The American Political Science Review, 86(4), 916–928. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964344.

14.

Born

(1994). Split-ticket voters, divided government, and fiorina’s policy-balancing model. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 19(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/439802.

15.

Brewer

M. D.

Stonecash

J. M.

(2001). Class, race issues, and declining white support for the democratic party in the South. Political Behavior, 23(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013033814576.

16.

Broockman

Kalla

Guerrero

Budolfson

Eyal

Jewell

Magalhaes

Sekhon

(2021). Broad cross-national public support for accelerated COVID-19 vaccine trial designs. Vaccine, 39(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.072.

17.

Buchler

(2011). Hiring and firing public officials: Rethinking the purpose of elections. Vol. 53. Oxford University Press.

18.

Bullock

C. S.

III Furr

R. P.

(1997). Race, turnout, runoff and election outcomes: The defeat of wyche fowler. Congress and the Presidency, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469709507822.

19.

Bullock

C. S.

III Gaddie

R. K.

Ferrington

(2002). System structure, campaign stimuli, and voter falloff in runoff primaries. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1210–1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00170.

20.

Burden

B. C.

Kimball

D. C.

(1998). A new approach to the study of ticket splitting. The American Political Science Reveiw, 92(3), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585479.

21.

Burden

B. C.

Kimball

D. C.

(2002). Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. University of Michigan Press.

22.

Burden

B. C

Kimball

D. C

(2009). Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. University of Michigan Press.

23.

Butler

D. M.

Butler

M. J.

(2006). Splitting the difference? Causal inference and theories of split-party delegations. Political Analysis, 14(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj010.

24.

Cain

B. E.

Ferejohn

J. A.

Fiorina

M. P.

(1984). The constituency service basis of the personal vote for U.S. representatives and British members of parliament. The American Political Science Review, 78(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961252.

25.

Carmines

E. G.

Stimson

J. A.

(1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton University Press.

26.

Carsey

T. M.

Layman

G. C.

(2004). Policy balancing and preferences for party control of government. Political Research Quarterly, 57(4), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700403.

27.

Coppock

Green

D. P.

(2021). Do Belief Systems Exhibit Dynamic Constraint?. The Journal of Politics.

28.

Coppock

McClellan

O. A.

(2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research and Politics, 6(1), 205316801882217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174.

29.

Davis

N. T.

Mason

(2016). Sorting and the split-ticket: Evidence from presidential and subpresidential elections. Political Behavior, 38(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9315-7.

30.

Edsall

T. B.

Edsall

M. D.

(1992). Chain reaction: The impact of race, rights, and taxes on American politics. Norton.

31.

Engstrom

R. L.

Engstrom

R. N.

(2008). The majority vote rule and runoff primaries in the United States. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.04.009.

32.

Erikson

R. S.

(2016). Congressional elections in presidential years: Presidential coattails and strategic voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12127.

33.

Fenno

R. F.

(1978). Home style: House members in their districts. : Longman.

34.

Fiorina

M. P.

(1988). The reagan years: Turning to the right or groping toward middle. Duke University Press.

35.

Fiorina

M. P.

(1989). “An Era of divided government.” center for American political studies. Harvard University. Occasional Paper 89-6).

36.

Fiorina

M. P.

(1996). Divided government. Allyn & Bacon.

37.

Fiorina

M. P.

(1992). Divided government. Macmillan.

38.

Fiorina

M. P.

Abrams

S. J.

(2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836.

39.

George

A. L

Bennett

(2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

40.

Gerring

(2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. : Cambridge University Press.

41.

Graham

M. H.

(2020). Self-awareness of political knowledge. Political Behavior, 42(1), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9499-8.

42.

Heckelman

J. C.

(2000). Sequential elections and overlapping terms: Voting for US Senate. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00076-7.

43.

Hetherington

M. J.

(2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401003045.

44.

Jacobson

G. C.

(1989). Strategic politicians and the dynamics of U.S. house elections, 1946-86. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 773–793. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962060.

45.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in US house elections. Journal of Politics, 77(3), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1086/681670.

46.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2017). The Triumph of polarized partisanship in 2016: Donald Trump’s improbable victory. Political Science Quarterly, 132(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12572.

47.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2019). Extreme referendum: Donald Trump and the 2018 midterm elections. Political Science Quarterly, 134(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12866.

48.

Kedar

(2009). Voting for policy, not parties: How voters compensate for power sharing. Cambridge University Press.

49.

Keith

B. E

Magleby

D. B

Nelson

C. J.

Orr

E. R.

Westlye

M. C

(1992). The myth of the independents voter. University of California Press.

50.

Lacy

Niou

E. M. S.

Paolino

Rein

R. A.

(2019). Measuring preferences for divided government: Some Americans want divided government and vote to create it. Political Behavior, 41(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9442-4.

51.

Lacy

Paolino

(1998). Downsian voting and the separation of powers. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1180–1199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991854.

52.

Layman

(2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. Columbia University Press.

53.

Levy

J. S.

(2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318.

54.

Lewis-beck

M. S.

Nadeau

(2004). Split-ticket voting: The effects of cognitive Madisonianism. Political Science, 66(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00143.x.

55.

Mayhew

D. R.

(1974). Congress: The electoral connection. Yale University Press.

56.

McCarty

Poole

K. T.

Rosenthal

(2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.

57.

Mebane

W. R.

(2000). Coordination, moderation, and institutional balancing in American Presidential and house elections. The American Political Science Review, 94(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586379.

58.

Morton

R. B.

Rietz

T. A.

(2006). Majority requirements and minority representation. New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 63(4), 691-726.

59.

Mulligan

(2011). Partisan ambivalence, split-ticket voting, and divided government. Political Psychology, 32(3), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00830.x.

60.

Munis

B. K.

(2020). Us over here versus them over there … literally: Measuring place resentment in American politics. Political Behavior.

61.

Peyton

Huber

G. A.

Coppock

(2021). The generalizability of online experiments conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2021.17.

62.

Saunders

K. L.

AbramowitzAbramowitz

A. I.

Williamson

(2005). A new kind of balancing act: Electoral certainty and ticket-splitting in the 1996 and 2000 elections. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800106.

63.

Scheve

Tomz

(1989). Electoral surprise and the midterm loss in U.S. congressional elections. British Journal of Political Science, 29(03), 507-521. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712349900023X.

64.

Segura

G. M.

Nicholson

S. P.

(1995). Sequential choices and partisan transitions in U.S. senate delegations: 1972-1988. The Journal of Politics, 57(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960272.

65.

Sigelman

Wahlbeck

P. J.

Buell

E. H.

Jr (1997). Vote choice and the preference for divided government: Lessons of 1992. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111678.

66.

Smidt

C. D.

(2017). Polarization and the decline of the American floating voter. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12218.

67.

Smith

C. E.

Brown

R. D.

Bruce

J. M.

Overby

L. M.

(1999). Party balancing and voting for congress in the 1996 national election. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 737. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991833.

68.

Stone

W. J.

(2017). Candidates and voters: Ideology, valence, and representation in US elections. Cambridge University Press.

69.

Valentino

N. A.

Sears

D. O.

(2005). Old times there are not forgotten: Race and partisan realignment in the contemporary south. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 672–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00136.x.

70.

Wolbrecht

(2000). The politics of women’s rights: Parties, positions, and change. Princeton University Press.

71.

Wright

S. G.

(1989). Voter turnout in runoff elections. The Journal of Politics, 51(2), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131348.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.70 MB