A Delicate Hand or Two-Fisted Aggression? How Gendered Language Influences Candidate Perceptions

Abstract

Gendered language is seemingly found everywhere in American politics. We test the impact that gendered language has on voter support for a candidate, using a validated dictionary of words rated as highly masculine or feminine. In three experimental studies, we find that the use of feminine language causes individuals to perceive political candidates as more liberal. Additionally, liberals tend to prefer candidates who use feminine language, and conservatives prefer candidates who use masculine language, regardless of the sex of the candidate. These effects are mostly mediated, however, by perceptions of candidate ideology caused by the use of language.

Keywords

gender language stereotypes experimental methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

Anderson

(1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 3527–3545. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600305.

Barabas

Jerit

Pollock

Rainey

(2014). The question(s) of political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 108(4), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000392.

Bauer

N. M.

(2015). Emotional, sensitive, and unfit for office? Gender stereotype activation and support female candidates. Political Psychology, 36(6), 6691–6708. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12186.

Bauer

N. M.

(2017). The effects of counterstereotypic gender strategies on candidate evaluations. Political Psychology, 38(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12351.

Bauer

N. M.

(2018). Untangling the relationship between partisanship, gender stereotypes, and support for female candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 39(1–25), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2016.1268875.

Bauer

N. M.

(2019). The effects of partisan trespassing strategies across candidate sex. Political Behavior, 41(4), 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9475-3.

Bauer

N. M.

(2020a). Running local: Gender stereotyping and female candidates in local elections. Urban Affairs Review, 56(1), 96–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418770807.

Bauer

N. M.

(2020b). Shifting standards: How voters evaluate the qualifications of female and male candidates. Journal of Politics, 82(1), 1–12. https://doi.og/10.1086/705817.

Bauer

N. M.

Carpinella

(2018). Visual information and candidate evaluations: The influence of feminine and masculine images on support for female candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917738579.

10.

Beckwith

(1986). American women and political participation. Greenwood Press.

11.

Berinsky

A. J.

Mendelberg

(2005). The indirect effects of discredited stereotypes in judgments of Jewish leaders. American Journal of Politics, 49(4), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00159.x.

12.

Bittner

Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinion. Political Behavior, 39(4), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9391-y.

13.

Bligh

M. C.

Schlehofer

M. M.

Casad

B. J.

Gaffney

A. M.

(2012). Competent enough, but would you vote for her? Gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(3), 560–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x.

14.

Bracic

Israel-

T. M.

Shortle

A. F.

(2018). Is sexism for white people? Stereotypes, race, and the 2016 presidential election. Political Behavior, 41(2), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9446-8.

15.

Burns

Schlozman

K. L.

Verba

(2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Harvard University Press.

16.

Butler

Geis

(1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(48–59), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.48.

17.

Carpenter

Preotiuc-Pietro

Flekova

Giorgi

Hagan

Margaret

L. K.

Anneke

E. K. B.

Lyle

Martin

E. P. S.

(2017). “Real men don’t say “cute”: Using automatic language analysis to isolate inaccurate aspects of stereotypes”. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 3310–3322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671998.

18.

Carroll

S. J.

(2009). Reflections on gender and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign: The good, the bad, and the misogynic. Politics & Gender, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x09000014.

19.

Clifford

Jewell

R. M.

Waggoner

P. D.

(2015). Are samples drawn from mechanical turk valid for research on political ideology? Research and Politics, 2(4), 1–9. https://doi.org10.1177/2053168015622072.

20.

Conover

P. J

(1988). Feminists and the gender gap. Journal of Politics, 50(4), 4985–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131388.

21.

Conroy

(2015). Masculinity, media and the American presidency. Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

Crowder-Meyer

(2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 390–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x13000391.

23.

Dittmar

(2015). Navigating gendered terrain: Stereotypes and strategy in political campaigns. Temple University Press.

24.

Dolan

Lynch

(2017). Do candidates run as women and men or democrats and republicans? The impact of party and sex on issue campaigns. Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy, 38(4), 522–546. htttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2016.1268876.

25.

Eagly

A. H.

Karau

S. J.

(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573.

26.

Everitt

Best

L. A.

Gaudet

(2016). Candidate gender, behavioral style, and willingness to vote: Support for female candidates depends on conformity to gender norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1737–1755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216676244.

27.

Fox

R. L.

Lawless

J. L.

(2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00069.x.

28.

Gastil

(1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23(11–12), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289252.

29.

Gaucher

Friesen

Kay

A. C.

(2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022530.

30.

Green

Bradley

Schickler

(2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.

31.

Haas

(1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616.

32.

Herrnson

P. S.

Lay

J. C.

Stokes

A. K.

Atiya

K. S.

(2003). Women running ‘as women’: Candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter-targeting strategies. Journal of Politics, 65(1), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00013.

33.

Hicks

Tingley

(2011). Mediation: Stata package for causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal, 11(4), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201100407.

34.

Huddy

Terkildsen

(1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111526.

35.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

(2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761.

36.

Jones

J. J.

(2016). Talk ‘like a man’: The linguistic styles of hillary clinton, 1992-2013. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592716001092.

37.

Karpowitz

C. F.

(2006). Having a say: Public hearings, deliberation, and democracy in America. PhD dissertation. Princeton University.

38.

Karpowitz

C. F.

Mendelberg

(2014). The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions. Princeton University Press.

39.

Kaufmann

K. M.

(2002). Culture wars, secular realignment, and the gender gap in party identification. Political Behavior, 24(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021824624892.

40.

Kaufmann

K. M.

Petrocik

J. R.

(1999). The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 18(2), 864–887. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991838.

41.

Kittilson

M. C.

Fridkin

(2008). Gender, candidate portrayals and election campaigns: A comparative perspective. Politics & Gender, 4(03), 3371–3392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X08000330.

42.

Klofstad

C. A.

Anderson

R. C.

Peters

(2012). Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in Both men and women. Proceedings Of the Royal Society Of London B: Biological Sciences, 279(1738), 2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311.

43.

Krupnikov

Bauer

N. M.

(2014). The relationship between campaign negativity, gender, and campaign context. Political Behavior, 36(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9221-9.

44.

Lawless

J. L.

Fox

R. L.

(2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. Cambridge University Press.

45.

McDermott

M. L.

(2016). Masculinity, femininity, and American political behavior. Oxford University Press.

46.

Mendelberg

Karpowitz

C. F.

Goedert

(2014). Does descriptive representation facilitate women’s distinctive voice? How gender composition and decision rules affect deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12077.

47.

Pearson

(2012). Congresswomen’s pursuit of power in a partisan environment. In Dodd

L. C.

Oppenheimer

B. I.

(Eds.), Congress reconsidered (10th ed.). CQ Press.

48.

Pérez

E. O.

Tavits

(2019). language influences public attitudes toward gender equality. Journal of Politics, 81(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/700004.

49.

Preece

J. R.

(2016). Mind the gender gap: An experiment on the influence of self-efficacy on political interest. Politics and Gender, 12(01), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x15000628.

50.

Roberts

D. C.

Utych

S. M.

(2020). Linking gender, language and partisanship: Developing a database of masculine and feminine words. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919874883.

51.

Sanbonmatsu

(2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46(20–34), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412.

52.

Sanbonmatsu

Dolan

(2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908322416.

53.

Schaffner

B. F.

(2005). Priming gender: Campaigning on women’s issues in U.S. senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00156.x.

54.

Schneider

M. C.

(2014). The effects of gender-bending on candidate evaluations. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 35(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2014.863697.

55.

Schreiber

(2008). Righting feminism. Oxford University Press.

56.

Trevor

M. C.

(1999). “Political socialization, party identification, and the gender gap”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(62–89), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/297703.

57.

Utych

S. M.

(2018). Negative affective language in politics. American Politics Research, 46(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x17693830.

58.

Welch

(1977). Women as political animals? A test of some explanations for male-female political participation differences. American journal of political science, 21(4), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110733.

59.

Winter

N. J. G.

(2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z.

60.

Wirls

(1986). Reinterpreting the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(3), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1086/268986.

61.

Wolbrecht

(2000). The politics of women’s rights. Princeton University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.38 MB