Existing research debates the extent to which feminine and masculine stereotypes affect voters’ impressions of female candidates. Current approaches identify how descriptions of female candidates as having feminine or masculine qualities lead voters to rely on stereotypes. We argue that extant scholarship overlooks a critical source of stereotypic information about female candidates—the role of visual information. This manuscript explores the conditions under which voters use feminine and masculine visuals to evaluate female candidates. Drawing on theories of information processing and stereotype reliance, we develop a framework that explains when visual information will affect how voters evaluate female and male candidates. We argue that visual information that is incongruent with stereotypes about a candidate’s sex will affect candidate evaluations while visuals congruent with stereotypes about candidate sex will not. We test these dynamics with an original survey experiment. We find that gender incongruent masculine visuals negatively affect evaluations of a female candidate’s issue competencies and electoral viability.
AlexanderDeborahAndersonKristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 527–45.
2.
BanducciSusan A.KarpJeffrey A.ThrasherMichaelRallingsColin. 2008. “Ballot Photographs as Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Psychology29 (6): 903–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00672.x.
3.
BarryAnn M.2005. “Perception Theory.” In Handbook of Visual Communication, edited by SmithKennethMoriartySandraBarbatsisGretchenKenneyKeith, 45–62. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BauerNichole M.2015. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office: Gender Stereotype Activation and Support for Female Candidates.” Political Psychology36 (6): 691–708. doi:10.1111/pops.12186.
5.
BauerNichole M.2016. “Gender Stereotypes and Voter Evalua-tions of Female Candidates.” In The Political Psychology of Women in U.S. Politics, edited by BosAngela L.SchneiderMonica C.167–183. New York: Routledge.
6.
BauerNichole M.2017. “The Effects of Counter-Stereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology38 (2): 279–95. doi:10.1111/pops.12351.
7.
BauerNichole M. Forthcoming. “Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268875.
8.
BauerNichole M.Yong HarbridgeLaurelKrupnikovYanna. 2017. “Who Is Punished? How Voters Evaluate Male and Female Legislators Who Do Not Compromise.” Political Behavior39 (2): 379–400.
9.
BenjaminiYoavHochbergYosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B57 (1): 289–300.
10.
BenjaminiYoavHochbergYosef. 2000. “On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing with Independent Statistics.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics25 (1): 60–83.
11.
BerinskyAdam J.MargolisMichele FSancesMichael W.2014. “‘Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys.’” American Journal of Political Science, 58 (3): 739–753.
12.
BishinBenjamin G.StevensDanielWilsonChristian. 2006. “Character Counts: Honesty and Fairness in Election 2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly70 (2): 235–48.
13.
BlairIrene V.BanajiMahzarin R.1996. “Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotype Priming.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70 (6): 1142–63.
14.
BlairIrene V.MaJennifer E.LentonAlison P.2001. “Imagining Stereotypes Away: The Moderation of Implicit Stereotypes through Mental Imagery.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81 (5): 828–41.
15.
BosAngela L.2011. “Out of Control: Delegates’ Information Sources and Perceptions of Female Candidates.” Political Communication28 (1): 87–109.
16.
BosAngela L.SchneiderMonica C.Utz.Brittany L.
Forthcoming. “Gender Stereotypes and Prejudice in U.S. Elections.” In APA Handbook of the Psychology of Women, edited by TravisCherylWhiteJackie.
17.
BrooksDeborah Jordan. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” Journal of Politics73 (2): 597–615.
18.
BrooksDeborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
BystromDianne. 2010. “Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage: Gender and Communication along the Campaign Trail.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by CarrollSue J.FoxRichard L., 239–262. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
CarpinellaColleen M.HehmanEricFreemanJonathan B.JohnsonKerri L.2016. “The Gendered Face of Partisan Politics: Consequences of Facial Sex Typicality for Vote Choice.” Political Communication33 (1): 21–38.
21.
CarpinellaColleen M.JohnsonKerri L.2016. “Visual Political Communication: The Impact of Facial Cues from Social Constituencies to Personal Pocketbooks.” Social & Personality Psychology Compass10 (5): 281–97. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.958260.
22.
CarpinellaColleen M.JonhnsonL. Kerri. 2013. “Appearance-Based Politics: Sex-Typed Facial Cues Communicate Political Party Affiliation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology49 (1): 156–60. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.009.
23.
CaverleyJonathan D.KrupnikovYanna. 2017. “’Aiming at Doves: Experimental Evidence of Military Images’ Political Effects.”’Journal of Conflict Resolution61 (7): 1482–1509.
24.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2016. “Current Numbers of Women Officeholders.” Center for American Women in Politics., New Brunswick.
25.
ClaassenRyan L.Barry RyanJohn. 2016. “Social Desirability, Hidden Biases, and Support for Hillary Clinton.” PS: Political Science & Politics49 (4): 730–35.
26.
ConroyMeredith. 2015. Masculinity, Media, and the American Presidency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
DitontoTessa M.2017. “A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior39 (2): 301–25. doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5.
28.
DitontoTessa M.HamiltonAllison J.RedlawskDavid P.2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior36 (2): 335–58.
29.
DittmarKelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
DolanKathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates & Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
DrewDan G.GrimesThomas. 1987. “Audio-Visual Redundancy and TV News Recall.” Communication Research14 (4): 452–61. doi:10.1177/009365087014004005.
32.
DruckmanJames N.KiferMartin J.ParkinMichael. 2009. “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review103 (3): 343–66. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990037.
33.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteve J.2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review109 (3): 573–94. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.
34.
EverittJoannaBestLisa A.GaudentDerek. 2016. “Candidate Gender, Behavioral Style, and Willingness to Vote: Support for Female Candidates Depends on Conformity to Gender Norms.” American Behavioral Scientist60 (14): 1737–55.
35.
FridkinKim L.KenneyPatrick J.2015. The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of U.S. Senators and Constituent Communications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
FunkCarolyn L.1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation.” Journal of Politics61 (3): 700–20.
37.
GrabeMaria ElizabethBucyErik P.2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
GraberDoris. 1990. “Seeing Is Remembering: How Visuals Contribute to Learning from Televsion News.” Journal of Communication40 (3): 134–55. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02275.x.
39.
HayesDanny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 908–23.
40.
HayesDanny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender7 (2): 133–65. doi:10.1017/S1743923X11000055.
41.
HayesDannyLawlessJennifer L.2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HehmanEricCarpinellaColleen M.JohnsonKerri L.LeitnerJordan B.FreemanJonathan B.2014. “Early Processing of Gendered Facial Cues Predicts the Electoral Success of Female Politicians.” Social Psychological & Personality Science5 (7): 815–24. doi:10.1177/1948550614534701.
43.
HeilmanMadeline E.BlockCaryn J.Martell.Richard F.1995. “Sex Stereotypes: Do They Influence Perceptions of Managers.” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality10 (4): 237–252.
44.
HerrickRebekah. 2016. “Gender Themes in State Legislative Candidates’ Websites.” The Social Science Journal53: 282–90.
45.
HitchonJacqueline C.ChangChingching. 1995. “Effects of Gender Schematic Processing on the Reception of Political Commercials for Men and Women Candidates.” Communication Research22 (4): 430–58.
46.
HolmanMirya R.MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Crises on Assessments of Gender and Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy32 (3): 173–92.
47.
HolmanMirya R.MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 134–47.
48.
HolmanMirya R.MerollaJennifer L.Zechmeister.Elizabeth J.2017. “Can Experience Overcome Stereotypes in Times of Terror Threat?” Research & Politics4 (1): 1–7.
49.
HolmanMirya R.SchneiderMonica C.PondelKristen. 2015. “‘Gender Targeting in Political Advertisements.”’Political Research Quarterly68 (4): 816–829.
50.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–47.
51.
IyengarShantoValentinoNicholas A.AnsolabehereStephen. 1996. “Running as a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Political Campaigns.” In Women, the Media and Politics, edited by PippaNorris, 77–99. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
KoenigAnne M.EaglyAlice H.MitchellAbigail A.RistikariTiina. 2011. “Are Leader Stereotypes Masculine? A Meta-analysis of Three Research Paradigms.” Psychological Bulletin137 (4): 616–42.
53.
KrupnikovYannaBauerNichole M.2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior36 (1): 167–88.
54.
KrupnikovYannaPistonSpencerBauerNichole M.2016. “Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black and Female Candidates.” Political Psychology37 (2): 253–73. doi:10.1111/pops.12261.
55.
KundaZivaDaviesPaul G.AdamsBarbara D.SpencerSteven J.2002. “The Dynamic Time Course of Stereotype Activation: Activation, Dissipation, and Resurrection.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82:283–99.
56.
LauRichard R.RedlawskDavid P.2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
LaustsenLasseBang PetersonMichael. 2016. “Winning Faces Vary by Ideology: How Nonverbal Source Cues Influence Election and Communication Success in Politics.” Political Communication33 (2): 188–211. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1050565.
58.
LawlessJennifer L.2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 479–90.
59.
McDermottMonika L.2016. Masculinity, Feminity, and American Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
MillerArthur H.WattenbergMartin P.OksanaMalanchuk. 1986. “Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review80 (2): 521–40.
61.
MoHyunjung Cecilia. 2015. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior37 (2): 357–95.
62.
MortonRebecca B.WilliamsKeneth C.2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
MutzDiana C.2011. Population Based Survey Experiments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
64.
NicholsonStephen P.CoeChelsea M.EmoryJasonSongAnna V.2016. “‘The Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness.”’Political Behavior38 (4): 883–898.
65.
PaivioAllan. 1979. Imagery and Verbal Processes. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
PetrocikJohn R.1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 825–50.
67.
PrenticeDeborah A.CarranzaErica. 2002. “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn’t Be, Are Allowed to Be, and Don’t Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly26 (4): 269–91. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.
68.
PriorMarkus. 2014. “Visual Political Knowledge: A Different Road to Competence?” Journal of Politics76 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1017/S0022381613001096.
69.
RosenbergShawn W.KahnShulamitTranThuyLeMinh-Thu. 1991. “Creating a Political Image: Shaping Appearance and Manipulating the Vote.” Political Behavior13 (4): 345–67.
70.
SanbonmatsuKiraDolanKathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 485–94.
71.
SapiroVirginiaCramer WalshKatherineStrachPatriciaHenningsValerie. 2011. “Gender, Context, and Television Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis of 2000 and 2002 House Races.” Political Research Quarterly64 (1): 107–19.
72.
SchaffnerBrian F.2005. “Priming Gender: Campaigning on Women’s Issues in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 803–17.
73.
SchillDan. 2012. “The Visual Image and the Political Image: A Review of Visual Communication Research in the Field of Political Communication.” Review of Communication12 (2): 118–42. doi:10.1080/15358593.2011.653504.
74.
SchneiderMonica C.2014. “The Effects of Gender-Bending on Candidate Evaluations.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy35:55–77.
75.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology35 (2): 245–66.
76.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2016. “The Intersection of Party and Gender Stereotypes in Evaluating Political Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy37 (3): 274–94.
77.
SheaDaniel M.BurtonMichael J.2001. Campaign Craft: The Strategies, Tactics, and Art of Political Campagin Management. Wesport: Praeger.
78.
SorokaS.LoewenP.FournierP.RubensonD. 2016. “The Impact of News Photos on Support for Military Action.” Political Communication33 (4): 563–582.
79.
StrebMatthew J.BurrellBarbaraFrederickBrianGenoveseMichael A.2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (1): 76–89.
80.
SulkinTracySwiggerNathaniel. 2008. “Is There Truth in Advertising? Campaign Ad Images as Signals about Legislative Behavior.” Journal of Politics70 (1): 232–44.
81.
SwiggerNathaniel. 2012. “What You See Is What You Get: Drawing Inferences from Campaign Imagery.” Political Communication29 (4): 367–86.
82.
TodorovAlexanderMandisodzaAnesuGorenAmirHallCrystal C.2005. “Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes.” Science308:1623–26. doi:10.1126/science.1110589.
83.
VinkenburgClaartjevan EngenMarloes L.EaglyAlice H.Johannesen-SchmidtMary C.2011. “An Exploration of Stereotypical Beliefs about Leadership Styles: Is Transformational Leadership a Route to Women’s Promotion?” The Leadership Quarterly22 (1): 10–21.
84.
VragaEmily K.2017. “Which Candidates Can Be Mavericks? TheEffects of Issue Disagreement and Gender onCandidate Evaluations.” Politics & Policy45 (1): 4–30.
85.
WinterNicholas J. G.2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior32 (4): 587–618. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z.
86.
ZhouShuhua. 2004. “Effects of Visual Intensity and Audiovisual Redundancy in Bad News.” Media Psychology6 (3): 237–56. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0603_1.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
