Although most ballots in the United States have historically been cast in-person, Americans are increasingly voting by mail, a trend that accelerated in the 2020 General Election. Mail ballots can be rejected after being cast, and our analysis of the Florida general elections of 2016, 2018, and 2020 shows that voters inexperienced with mail voting disproportionately submit ballots that end up rejected due to (1) late arrival at elections offices or (2) signature defects on return envelopes. Inexperienced mail voters are up to three times more likely to have their ballots rejected compared to experienced mail voters, and this inexperience penalty varies by a voter’s party registration, race/ethnicity, and age. Our findings hold when controlling for additional voter characteristics and geographical fixed effects. The effect of inexperience on the likelihood of vote-by-mail ballot rejection risks exacerbating existing inequities in political representation already faced by younger and racial/ethnic minority voters.
AlvarezR. M.HallT. E.SinclairB. (2008). Whose absentee votes are returned and counted: The variety and use of absentee ballots in california. Electoral Studies, 27(4), 673–683.
2.
BarberM.HolbeinJ. B. (2020). The participatory and partisan impacts of mandatory vote-by-mail. Science Advances, 6(35), eabc7685.
3.
BaringerA.HerronM. C.SmithD. A. (2020). Voting by mail and ballot rejection: Lessons from florida for elections in the age of the coronavirus. Election Law Journal, 19 (3), 289–320.
4.
BeckerT. M.TrinkausK. M.BuckleyD. I. (1996). Tool-related injuries among amateur and professional woodworkers. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 38(10), 1032–1035.
5.
BrombergY. (2019). Youth voting rights and the unfulfilled promise of the twenty-sixth amendment. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 21, 1105–1166.
6.
ButlerD. M.BroockmanD. E. (2011). Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? a field experiment on state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477.
7.
CoppockA.GreenD. P. (2016). Is voting habit forming? New evidence from experiments and regression discontinuities. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 1044–1062.
CurryA. E.PfeifferM. R.DurbinD. R.ElliottM. R. (2015). Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 80, 243–250.
10.
FabianoB.CurròF.ReverberiA. P.PastorinoR. (2008). A statistical study on temporary work and occupational accidents: Specific risk factors and risk management strategies. Safety Science, 46(3), 535–544.
11.
FragaB. L. (2018). The turnout gap: Race, ethnicity, and political inequality in a diversifying America. Cambridge University Press.
12.
GerberA. S.GreenD. P.ShacharR. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550.
13.
GrofmanB.LijphartA. (1986). Electoral laws and their political consequences. Algora Publishing.
14.
HallT. E. (2014). Voting from abroad: Evaluating uocava voting. In BurdenB. C.Stewart IIIC. (Eds.), The measure of American elections (p. 141–165). Cambridge University Press.
15.
HanmerM. J.HerrnsonP. S. (2014). Provisional ballots. In BurdenB. C.StewartC. (Eds.), The measure of American elections (p. 91–112). Cambridge University Press.
16.
HanmerM. J.TraugottM. W. (2004). The impact of voting by mail on voter behavior. American Politics Research, 32(4), 375–405.
17.
HassellH. J. (2017).Teaching voters new tricks: The effect of partisan absentee vote-by-mail get-out-the-vote efforts. Research & Politics, 4(1), 1–6.
18.
HeinrichH. W. (1931). Industrial accident prevention. McGraw-Hill.
19.
HerronM. C.SmithD. A. (2021). Postal delivery disruptions and the fragility of voting by mail: Lessons from maine. Research & Politics, 8(1), 1–12.
20.
HerrnsonP. S.HanmerM. J.KohH. Y. (2019). Mobilization around new convenience voting methods: A field experiment to encourage voting by mail with a downloadable ballot and early voting. Political Behavior, 41(4), 871–895.
21.
HerrnsonP. S.NiemiR. G.HanmerM. J.BedersonB. B.ConradF. G.TraugottM. W. (2009). Voting technology: The not-so-simple act of casting a ballot. Brookings Institution Press.
22.
HoodM.IIIHaynesA. (June29–July2, 2020). Mail it in: An analysis of the peach state’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. In 4th annual ESRA conference, Gainesville, FL. June29, 2020–July2.
23.
HopkinsD. J.MeredithM.ChainaniA.OlinN.TseT. (2021). Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(4), e2021022118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021022118
24.
IssacharoffS. (2014). Ballot bedlam. Duke Law Journal, 64, 1363–1410.
25.
KatzR. S. (1997). Democracy and elections. Oxford University Press.
26.
KeyssarA. (2009). The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the united states. Basic Books.
27.
KimballD. C.KropfM. (2006). The street-level bureaucrats of elections: Selection methods for local election officials. Review of Policy Research, 23(6), 1257–1268.
28.
KingB. A.BarnesA. (2019). Descriptive representation in election administration: Poll workers and voter confidence. Election Law Journal, 18(1), 16–30.
29.
LeighleyJ. E.NaglerJ. (2013). Who votes now?Princeton University Press.
30.
LiQ.PomanteM. J.IISchraufnagelS. (2018). Cost of voting in the american states. Election Law Journal, 17(3), 234–247.
31.
MannC. B. (2014). Mail ballots in the united states: Policy choice and administrative challenges. In BurdenB. C.Stewart IIIC. (Eds.), The measure of american elections (p. 113–140). Cambridge University Press.
32.
MannC. B.MayhewG. (2015). Voter mobilization meets egovernment: Turnout and voting by mail from online or paper ballot request. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(4), 352–380.
33.
MengerA.SteinR. M. (2020). Choosing the less convenient way to vote: An anomaly in vote by mail elections. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919890009
34.
MeredithM. (2009). Persistence in political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4(3), 187–209.
35.
MerivakiT.SmithD. A. (2020). A failsafe for voters? cast and rejected provisional ballots in north carolina. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 65–78.
36.
MonroeN. W.SylvesterD. E. (2011). Who converts to vote-by-mail? Evidence from a field experiment. Election Law Journal, 10(1), 15–35.
37.
PlutzerE. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.
38.
ShinoE.MartinezM. D.McDonaldM. P.SmithD. A. (2020). Verifying voter registration records. American Politics Research, 48(6), 677–681.
39.
ShinoE.SmithD. A. (2018). Timing the habit: Voter registration and turnout. Electoral Studies, 51, 72–82.
40.
ShinoE.Suttmann-LeaM.SmithD. A. (2021). Determinants of rejected mail ballots in georgia’s 2018 general election. Political Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912921993537
41.
SpringerM. J. (2014). How the States Shaped the Nation % : American Electoral Institutions and Voter Turnout, 1920–2000. University of Chicago Press.
42.
SteinRobert M.VonnahmeG. (2010). Early, Absentee, and Mail-in Voting. In LeighleyJan E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior (p. 182–199). Oxford University Press.
Suttmann-LeaM. (2020). Poll worker decision making at the American ballot box. American Politics Research, 48(6), 714–718. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20920266
45.
ThompsonD. M.WuJ. A.YoderJ.HallA. B. (2020). Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(25), 14052–14056.
WhiteA. R.NathanN. L.FallerJ. K. (2014). What Do I Need to Vote? Bureaucratic discretion and discrimination by local election officials. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 129–142.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
