Celebrities saturate American culture and often become relevant in politics, yet political science has largely left unstudied how celebrities affect mass political behavior. We focus on the 2015 story of Caitlyn Jenner revealing her transgender identity. Using an original nationally representative survey from that summer, we examine whether following the Jenner story and evaluations of its social significance affected attitudes toward transgender rights policies. Specifically, we examine how age and transphobia interacted with engagement with the Jenner story to shape attitudes toward transgender rights. We find, counterintuitively, that older respondents who were more transphobic were less likely to see her story as representing negative social trends if they followed it in the media. Furthermore, more transphobic older respondents were more likely to support pro-transgender policies if they viewed Jenner’s story less negatively. We then discuss the implications of our findings for research on celebrity effects on politics and transgender rights.
ArmstrongG. B.NeuendorfK. A. (1992). TV entertainment, news, and racial perceptions of college students. Journal of Communication, 42(3), 153–176.
2.
AustinE. W.Van de VordR.PinkletonB. E.EpsteinE. (2008). Celebrity endorsements and their potential to motivate young voters. Mass Communication and Society, 11(4), 420–436.
BondB. J.ComptonB. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(4), 717–732.
5.
BuksaI.MitsisA. (2011). Generation Y’s athlete role model perceptions on PWOM behavior. Young Consumers, 12(4), 337–347.
6.
ChouH. (2015). Celebrity political endorsement effects: A perspective on the social distance of political parties. International Journal of Communication, 9, 523–546.
7.
CurrahP.JuangR.MinterS. (2006). Transgender rights. University of Minnesota Press.
8.
DixS.PhauI.PougnetS. (2010). “Bend It Like Beckham”: The influence of sports celebrities on young adult consumers. Young Consumers, 11(1), 36–46.
9.
FloresA. R. (2015). Attitudes toward transgender rights: Perceived knowledge and secondary interpersonal contact. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(3), 398–416.
10.
FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD. P.LewisD. C.MillerP. R.TadlockB. L.TaylorJ. K. (2018). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and Rights. Political Psychology, 39(1), 197–216.
11.
FujiokaY. (1999). Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: Examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 52–75.
12.
GalinecM.KorajlijaA. L. (2017). The effect of different ways of providing information about transsexualism on student attitudes. Psychology and Sexuality, 8(4), 280–290.
13.
GarretsonJ. J. (2015). Exposure to the lives of lesbians and gays and the origin of young people’s greater support for gay rights. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(2), 277–288.
14.
GideonL. (2012). Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. Springer.
15.
GilligT. K.RosenthalE. L.MurphyS. T.FolbK. L. (2018). More than a media moment: The influence of televised storylines on viewers’ attitudes toward transgender people and policies. Sex Roles, 78(7–8), 515–527.
16.
GunterB. (2014). Celebrity capital: Assessing the value of fame. Bloomsbury.
17.
Haider-MarkelD. P.MillerP. R.FloresA. R.LewisD. C.TadlockB. L.TaylorJ. K. (2017). Bringing “T” to the table: Understanding individual support for transgender candidates for public office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(3), 399–417.
18.
HarrisonB. F.MichelsonM. R. (2019). Gender, masculinity threat, and support for transgender rights: An experimental study. Sex Roles, 80(1–2), 63–75.
19.
HarveyM. (2017). Celebrity influence: Politics, persuasion, and issue-based advocacy. University of Kansas Press.
20.
HillD. B.WilloughbyB. L. B. (2005). The development and validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale. Sex Roles, 53(7–8), 531–544.
21.
HoffarthM. R.HodsonG. (2018). When intergroup contact is uncommon and bias is strong: The case of anti-transgender bias. Psychology and Sexuality, 9(3), 237–250.
InthornS.StreetJ. (2011). “Simon Cowell for prime minister”? Young citizens’ attitudes towards celebrity politics. Media, Culture, & Society, 33(3), 479–489.
25.
JacksonD. J. (2008). Selling politics: The impact of celebrities’ political beliefs on young Americans. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(4), 67–83.
26.
JacksonD. J.DarrowT. I. A. (2005). The influence of celebrity endorsements on young adults’ political opinions. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(3), 80–98.
27.
JonesP. E.BrewerP. R. (2018). Elite cues and public polarization on transgender rights. Politics, Groups, and Identities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1441722
28.
JonesP. E.BrewerP. R.YoungD. G.LambeJ. L.HoffmanL. H. (2018). Explaining public opinion toward transgender people, rights, and candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 252–278.
29.
KanazawaS. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 167–171.
30.
KleinbergK. B.FordhamB. O. (2017). Don’t know much about foreign policy: Assessing the impact of “don’t know” and “no opinion” responses on inferences about foreign policy attitudes. Foreign Policy Analysis, 14(3), 429–448.
31.
LaFerleC.ChanK. (2008). Determinants for materialism among adolescents in Singapore. Young Consumers, 9(3), 201–214.
32.
LewisD. C.FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD. P.MillerP. R.TadlockB. L.TaylorJ. K. (2017). Degrees of acceptance: Variation in public attitudes toward segments of the LGBT community. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 861–875.
33.
LovelockM. (2017). Call Me Caitlyn: Making and making over the “authentic” transgender body in Anglo-American popular culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(6), 675–687.
34.
MarwickA. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
35.
McClerkingH. K.LairdC. N.BlockR.Jr. (2019). The fragility of racial transcendence: An analysis of Oprah Winfrey’s endorsement of the Barack Obama 2008 presidential campaign. American Politics Research, 47(2), 304–328.
36.
McDermottD. T.BrooksA. S.RohlederP.BlairK.HoskinR. A.McDonaghL. K. (2018). Ameliorating transnegativity: Assessing the immediate and extended efficacy of a pedagogic prejudice reduction intervention. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(1), 69–85.
37.
MillerP. R.FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD. P.LewisD. C.TadlockB. L.TaylorJ. K. (2017). Transgender politics as body politics: Effects of disgust sensitivity and authoritarianism on transgender rights attitudes. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(1), 4–24.
38.
NortonA. T.HerekG. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753.
39.
NownesA. J. (2012). An experimental investigation of the effects of celebrity support for political parties in the United States. American Politics Research, 40(3), 476–500.
40.
PeaseA.BrewerP. R. (2008). The Oprah factor: The effects of a celebrity endorsement in a presidential primary campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4), 386–400.
41.
PerseE. M.RubinR. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77.
42.
ReevesB.NessC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
43.
RiggleE. D. B.EllisA. L.CrawfordA. M. (1996). The impact of “media contact” on attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 31(3), 55–69.
44.
RothbartM.JohnO. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 81–104.
45.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will and Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15–37.
46.
SolomonH. E.Kurtz-CostesB. (2018). Media’s influence on perceptions of trans women. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(1), 34–47.
47.
StevensJ. A.LathropA. H.BradishC. L. (2003). Who is your hero? Implications for athlete endorsement strategies. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 12(2), 103–110.
48.
StreetJ.HugueS.SavignyH. (2008). Playing to the crowd: The role of music and musicians in political participation. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10(2), 269–285.
49.
TadlockB. L.FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD. P.LewisD. C.MillerP. R.TaylorJ. K. (2017). Testing contact theory and attitudes on transgender rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(4), 956–972.
50.
TanA.FujiokaY.LuchtN. (1997). Native American stereotypes, TV portrayals, and personal contact. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 265–284.
51.
TaylorJ. K.LewisD. C.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2018). The remarkable rise of transgender rights. University of Michigan Press.
52.
WestD. M.OrmanJ. M. (2003). Celebrity politics. Prentice Hall.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
