Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Parties need to win elections, but they also heed the policy preferences of activists to provide the incentive to mobilize. Moving beyond the debate as to whether parties as a whole are policy or office driven, we examine groups within parties and identify different factions that place differential emphasis on office-seeking versus policy-demanding. Using data from the 2012 Convention Delegate Study of Democratic and Republican Party national delegates, we identify distinct factional groups within each party. We map these factions within each party, finding policy-driven and office-driven factions of delegates in both Republican and Democratic parties. We evaluate each group’s response to political and party involvement, support for the larger party organization, and response to both intra- and interparty conflict. Finally, we make clear the picture of factional relationships within each party by accounting for how factional goals are integrated into the party organization over time.

Keywords

political parties convention delegates 2012 election

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

McGlennon

Rapoport

(1983). The party isn’t over: Incentives for activism in the 1980 presidential nominating campaign. The Journal of Politics, 45, 1006-1015.

Aldrich

J. H.

(2012). Why parties? A second look. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bawn

Cohen

Karol

Masket

Noel

Zaller

(2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10, 571-597.

Carsey

T. M.

Green

J. C.

Herrera

Layman

G. C.

(2003). The new party professionals? An initial look at national convention delegates in 2000 and over time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference, Society of Political Methodology annual meeting, July, Tallahassee, FL.

Carsey

T. M.

Green

J. C.

Herrera

Layman

G. C.

(2006). State party context and norms among delegates to the 2000 national party conventions. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 6, 247-271.

Cohen

Karol

Noel

Zaller

(2009). The party decides: Presidential nominations before and after reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Conger

K. H.

(2009). The Christian right in republican state politics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Conway

M. M.

Feigert

F. B.

(1968). Motivation, incentive systems, and the political party organization. American Political Science Review, 62, 1159-1173.

DiSalvo

(2012). Engines of change: Party factions in American politics, 1868-2010. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

10.

Downs

(1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper.

11.

Freeman

(1986). The political culture of the democratic and Republican parties. Political Science Quarterly, 101, 327-356.

12.

Galvin

D. J.

(2009). Presidential party building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

Green

J. C.

(2007). The faith factor: How religion influences American elections. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

14.

Green

J. C.

Guth

J. L.

(1988). The Christian right in the Republican Party: The case of Pat Robertson’s supporters. The Journal of Politics, 50, 150-165.

15.

Grossmann

Hopkins

D. A.

(2015). Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats: The asymmetry of American Party politics. Perspectives on Politics, 13, 119-139.

16.

Heaney

M. T.

Masket

S. E.

Miller

J. M.

Strolovitch

D. Z.

(2012). Polarized networks: The organizational affiliations of national party convention delegates. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 1654-1676.

17.

Herrera

(1992). The understanding of ideological labels by political elites: A research note. The Western Political Quarterly, 45, 1021-1035.

18.

Herrera

(1996). Understanding the language of politics: A study of elites and masses. Political Science Quarterly, 111, 619-637.

19.

Herrera

Taylor

M. K.

(1994). The structure of opinion in American political parties. Political Studies, 42, 676-689.

20.

Kirkpatrick

J. J.

(1975). The new presidential elite: Men and women in national politics. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

21.

Klinkner

P. A.

(1994). The losing parties: Out-party national committees, 1956-1993. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

22.

Koger

Masket

Noel

(2010). Cooperative party factions in American politics. American Politics Research, 38, 33-53.

23.

Layman

(2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

24.

Layman

Carsey

T. M.

Green

J. C.

Herrera

(2010). Activists and conflict extension in American party politics. The American Political Science Review, 104, 324-346.

25.

Makles

(2012). Stata tip 110: How to get the optimal k-means cluster solution. The State Journal, 12, 347-351.

26.

Miller

Jennings

M. K.

(1986). Parties in transition. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

27.

Roback

(1975). Amateurs and professionals: Delegates to the 1972 Republican National Convention. The Journal of Politics, 37, 436-468.

28.

Schickler

(2016). Racial realignment: The transformation of American liberalism, 1932-1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Schlesinger

J. A.

(1994). Political parties and the winning of office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

30.

Shufeldt

(2018). Party–group ambivalence and voter loyalty: Results from three experiments. American Politics Research, 46, 132-168.

31.

Soule

J. W.

Clarke

J. W.

(1975). A comparative study of presidential nominating conventions: The democrats 1968 and 1972. American Journal of Political Science, 19, 501-518.

32.

Soule

J. W.

McGrath

W. E.

(1975). A comparative study of presidential nomination conventions: The democrats 1968 and 1972. American Journal of Political Science, 19, 501-517.

33.

Stone

W. J.

Abramowitz

A. I.

(1983). Winning may not be everything, but it’s more than we thought: Presidential party activists in 1980. The American Political Science Review, 77, 945-956.

34.

Usher

(2000). Strategy, rules and participation: Issue activists in Republican national convention delegations, 1976-1996. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 887-903.

35.

Wilcox

Robinson

(2010). Onward Christian soldiers? The religious right in American politics (4th Rev. ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

36.

Wildavsky

(1965). The Goldwater phenomenon: Purists, politicians, and the two-party system. The Review of Politics, 27, 386-413.

37.

Williamson

Skocpol

Coggin

(2011). The tea party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 25-43.

38.

Wilson

J. Q.

(1962). The amateur Democrat: Club politics in three cities. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.52 MB

0.38 MB

Group Commitment Among U.S. Party Factions: A Perspective From Democratic and Republican National Convention Delegates

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material