Since the 1970s, American politics has taken an impressive turn away from political dealignment and moved toward a more responsible party system. As a result, elections have become more nationalized, a process by which presidential and national politics exert greater influence over down-ballot contests. We evaluate nationalization in electoral contests for two high-profile offices—U.S. Senate and governor—that encompass the same constituencies but constitute markedly different job descriptions and mandated responsibilities. Our analysis utilizes both macro- and micro-level data (election returns and surveys, respectively) to assess patterns of nationalization in these elections. Although it is perhaps not surprising that the linkage between presidential and senatorial contests has tightened, it appears national political forces now also exert greater influence over gubernatorial contests. Nonetheless, we do find regional variation in the nationalization of senatorial and gubernatorial politics, which is more evident in the latter office.
AbramowitzA. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AbramowitzA. I.SaundersK. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634-652.
3.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12-22.
4.
AistrupJ. A. (1996). The southern strategy revisited: Republican top-down advancement in the south. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
5.
AnsolabehereS.SnyderJ. M.Jr. (2002). The incumbency advantage in U.S. elections: An analysis of state and federal offices, 1942-2000. Election Law Journal, 1, 315-338.
6.
AtkesonL. R.PartinR. W. (1995). Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 89, 99-107.
7.
BartelsL. M. (1998). Electoral continuity and change, 1868-1996. Electoral Studies, 17, 301-326.
8.
BartelsL. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35-50.
9.
BassJ.DeVriesW. (1976). The transformation of southern politics: Social change and political consequence since 1945. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BishopB.CushingR. G. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
BlackE.BlackM. (1987). Politics and society in the south. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BlackE.BlackM. (2002). The rise of southern republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BlackE.BlackM. (2007). Divided America: The ferocious power struggle in American politics. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
14.
BrownA. R.JacobsonG. C. (2008). Party, performance, and strategic politicians: The dynamics of elections for senator and governor in 2006. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8, 384-409.
15.
BullockC. S.III.HoffmanD. R.GaddieR. K. (2005). The consolidation of the white southern congressional vote. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 231-243.
16.
CainB.FerejohnJ.FiorinaM. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
CarseyT. M.LaymanG. C. (2004). Policy balancing and preferences for party control of government. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 541-550.
19.
CarseyT. M.WrightG. C. (1998a). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 994-1002.
20.
CarseyT. M.WrightG. C. (1998b). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections: A rejoinder. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1008-1011.
21.
CarsonJ. L.SievertJ. (2017). Congressional candidates in the era of party ballots. Journal of Politics, 79, 534-545.
22.
ClaggettW.FlaniganW.ZingaleN. (1984). Nationalization of the American electorate. American Political Science Review, 78, 77-91.
23.
CoxG. W.KatzJ. N. (1996). Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections grow?American Journal of Political Science, 40, 478-497.
24.
DavisN. T.MasonL. (2016). Sorting and the split-ticket: Evidence from presidential and subpresidential elections. Political Behavior, 38, 337-354.
25.
EngstromE. J.KernellS. (2014). Party ballots, reform, and the transformation of America’s electoral system. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
FennoR. F. (1978). Home style: House member in their districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
27.
FiorinaM. P. (1977). Congress: Keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
FlaniganW. H.ZingaleN. H.Theiss-MorseE. A.WagnerM. W. (2015). Political behavior of the American electorate. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
29.
FleisherR.BondJ. R. (2004). The shrinking middle in the US congress. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 429-451.
30.
GasperJ. T.ReevesA. (2011). Make it rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 340-355.
31.
GimpelJ. G.SchuknechtJ. E. (2004). Patchwork nation: Sectionalism and political change in American politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
HetheringtonM. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95, 619-631.
33.
HightonB. (2000). Senate elections in the United States, 1920–94. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 483-506.
34.
HolbrookT. M. (2016). Altered states: Changing populations, changing parties, and the transformation of the American political landscape. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
IyengarS.WestwoodS. J. (2014). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690-707.
36.
JacobsonG. C. (1993). Getting the details right: A comment on “changing meanings of electoral marginality in US house elections, 1824-1978.” Political Research Quarterly, 46, 49-54.
37.
JacobsonG. C. (2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
38.
JacobsonG. C. (2009). The 2008 presidential and congressional elections: Anti-bush referendum and prospects for the democratic majority. Political Science Quarterly, 124, 1-30.
39.
JacobsonG. C. (2011). The republican resurgence in 2010. Political Science Quarterly, 126, 27-52.
40.
JacobsonG. C. (2012). The president’s effect on partisan attitudes. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42, 683-718.
41.
JacobsonG. C. (2013). How the economy and partisanship shaped the 2012 presidential and congressional elections. Political Science Quarterly, 128, 1-38.
42.
JacobsonG. C. (2014). Congress: Partisanship and polarization. In NelsonM. (Ed.), The elections of 2012 (pp. 145-171). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
43.
JacobsonG. C. (2015a). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections. Journal of Politics, 77, 861-873.
44.
JacobsonG. C. (2015b). Obama and nationalized electoral politics in the 2014 midterm. Political Science Quarterly, 130, 1-26.
45.
JacobsonG. C.CarsonJ. L. (2016). The politics of congressional elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
46.
KawatoS. (1987). Nationalization and partisan realignment in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 81, 1235-1250.
47.
KoganV.LavertuS.PeskowitzZ. (2018). Election timing, electorate composition, and policy outcomes: Evidence from school districts. American Journal of Political Science, 62, 637-651.
48.
LangC.Pearson-MerkowitzS. (2015). Partisan sorting in the United States, 1972-2012: New evidence from a dynamic analysis. Political Geography, 48, 119-129.
49.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press.
50.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
MayhewD. R. (2002). Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
McKeeS. C. (2008). Rural voters and the polarization of American presidential elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41, 101-108.
53.
McKeeS. C. (2012). The past, present, and future of southern politics. Southern Cultures, 18, 95-117.
54.
McKeeS. C.TeigenJ. M. (2009). Probing the reds and blues: Sectionalism and voter location in the 2000 and 2004 U.S. presidential elections. Political Geography, 28, 484-495.
55.
McKeeS. C.YoshinakaA. (2015). Late to the parade: Party switchers in contemporary US southern legislatures. Party Politics, 21, 957-969.
56.
MorrillR. L.WebsterG. R. (2015). Spatial and political realignment of the U.S. electorate, 1988-2012. Political Geography, 48, 93-107.
57.
MyersA. (2013). Secular geographical polarization in the American south: The case of Texas, 1996-2010. Electoral Studies, 32, 38-62.
58.
NicholsonS. P. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections, and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
RuskJ. G. (1970). The effect of the Australian ballot reform on split ticket voting: 1876-1908. American Political Science Review, 64, 1220-1238.
60.
ShaferB. E. (2016). The American political pattern: Stability and change, 1932-2016. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
61.
SimonD. M. (1989). Presidents, governors, and electoral accountability. Journal of Politics, 51, 286-304.
62.
SmithD. A.TolbertC. J. (2010). Direct democracy, public opinion, and candidate choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 85-108.
63.
SquireP.FastnowC. (1994). Comparing gubernatorial and senate elections. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 705-720.
64.
StokesD. (1967). Parties and the nationalization of electoral forces. In ChambersW. N.BurnhamW. D. (Eds.), The American party systems (pp. 182-202). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
WattenbergM. P. (1998). The decline of American political parties, 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
WestD. M. (2013). Air wars: Television advertising and social media in election campaigns 1952-2012. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
67.
WrightG. C. (1989). Level-of-analysis effects on explanations of voting: The case of the 1982 US senate elections. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 381-398.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
