Despite prevailing negative conditions, initial analyses of the 2008 presidential election, including this one, find significant but not particularly strong economic voting effects during the fall campaign. In this article, the authors pay special attention to how the economic information context changed during the campaign and how those changes affected the evolution of retrospective voting. The findings show that there were two distinct phases of the fall campaign, that retrospective voting was nonexistent prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers but was strong following the collapse. In effect, the collapse of Lehman Brothers turned the election into a referendum election.
CampbellJames E.2008. “The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics41:697-70.
2.
Delli CarpiniMichaelKeeterScott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
EdwardsGeorge C.MitchellWilliamWelchReed. 1995. “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Significance of Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science39:108-34.
4.
EriksonRobert S.2009. “The American Voter and the Economy, 2008.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:467-71.
5.
FiorinaMorris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
FriedrichRobert. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science26:797-833.
7.
HetheringtonMarc J.1996. “The Media’s Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science40:372-95.
8.
HolbrookThomas M.2002. “Forecasting with Mixed Economic Signals: A Cautionary Tale.” PS: Political Science & Politics34:39-44.
9.
HolbrookThomas M.2008. “Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2008 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics41:709-12.
10.
HolbrookThomas M.2009. “Economic Considerations and the 2008 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:473-78.
11.
HolbrookThomas M.2010. “Forecasting U.S. Presidential Elections.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, edited by Jan E. Leighley,. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
HutchingsVincent L.2009. “Change or More of the Same? Evaluating Racial Attitudes in the Obama Era.” Public Opinion Quarterly73:917-42.
13.
IyengarShantoKinderDonald R.1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
JamiesonKathleen Hall. 2009. Electing the President, 2008: The Insiders’ View. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.NadeauRichard. 2009. “Obama and the Economy in 2008.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:479-83.
16.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Election Outcomes.” In Annual Review of Political Science, edited by PolsbyNelson. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
17.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2007. “Economic Models of Voting.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by DaltonRussell J.KlingemannHans-Dieter. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
LinnSuzannaMoodyJonathanAsperStephanie. 2009. “Explaining the Horse Race of 2008.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:459-65.
19.
LockerbieBrad. 2008. “Election Forecasting: The Future of the Presidency and the House.” PS: Political Science & Politics41:713-16.
20.
LongJ. ScottFreeseJeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
21.
MalhotraNeilKrosnickJon A.2007. “Retrospective and Prospective Performance Assessments during the 2004 Election Campaign: Tests of Mediation and News Media Priming.” Political Behavior29:249-78.
22.
MalhotraNeilMargalitYotam. 2010. “Short-Term Communication Effects or Longstanding Dispositions? The Public’s Response to the Financial Crisis of 2008.” Journal of Politics72:852-67.
23.
MasketSeth E.2009. “Did Obama’s Ground Game Matter? The Influence of Local Field Offices during the 2008 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly73:1023-39.
24.
MillerJoanne M.KrosnickJon A.2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science44:295-309.
25.
NadeauRichardLewis-BeckMichael S.2001. “National Economic Voting in US Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics63:159-81.
26.
NadeauRichardNiemiRichard G.FanDavid P.AmatoTimothy. 1999. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics61:109-35.
OsbornTracyMcClurgScott D.KnollBenjamin. 2010. “Voter Mobilization and the Obama Victory.” American Politics Research38:211-23.
29.
PasekJoshTahkAlexanderLelkesYphtachKrosnickJon A.PayneB. KeithAkhtarOmairTompsonTrevor. 2009. “Determinants of Turnout and Candidate Choice in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election: Illuminating the Impact of Racial Prejudice and Other Considerations.” Public Opinion Quarterly73:943-94.
30.
PhilpotTasha S.ShawDaron R.McGowenErnest B.2009. “Winning the Race: Black Voter Turnout in the 2008 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly73:995-1022.
31.
PopkinSamuel. 1994. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
PowellG. BinghamJr.WhittenGuy D.1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37:391-414.
33.
RafteryAdrian S.1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology25:111-63.
34.
ShahDhavan V.WattsMark D.DomkeDavidFanDavid P.FibisonMichael. 1999. “News Coverage, Economic Cues, and the Public’s Presidential Preferences, 1984–1996.” Journal of Politics61:914-43.
35.
StevensonRandolph T.VavreckLynn. 2000. “Does Campaign Length Matter? Testing for Cross-National Effects.” British Journal of Political Science30:217-35.
36.
ValentinoNicholas A.HutchingsVincent L.WhiteIsmail K.2002. “Cues That Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns” American Political Science Review96:75-90.
37.
VavreckLynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ZallerJohnFeldmanStanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science36:579-616.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
