In this study, I examine whether the effect of biased media can be reduced when voters have an alternative source of political information. Specifically, I investigate whether the introduction of television mitigated the effect of partisan press on U.S. presidential elections from 1944 to 1964. I first show that newspaper coverage of presidential campaigns during this period was affected by newspapers’ party affiliations and their readers’ political preferences. The main finding of this study is that television decreased the correlation between the circulation of partisan newspapers and parties’ vote share. The results suggest that the existence of centrist media can make voters less susceptible to partisan media.
AndersonS.McLarenJ. (2012). Media mergers and media bias with rational consumers. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 831-859.
2.
AnsolabehereS.LessemR.SnyderJ. M.Jr. (2006). The orientation of newspaper endorsements in U.S. elections, 1940–2002. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 393-404.
3.
BaronD. P. (2006). Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1-36.
4.
BerelsonB.LazarsfeldP. F.McPheeW. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
BernhardtD.KrasaS.PolbornM. (2008). Political polarization and the electoral effects of media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1092-1104.
6.
BesleyT.PratA. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review, 96, 720-736.
7.
CampanteF. R.HojmanD. A. (2013). Media and polarization: Evidence from the introduction of broadcast TV in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 100, 79-92.
8.
ChiangC.-F.KnightB. (2011). Media bias and influence: Evidence from newspaper endorsements. Review of Economic Studies, 78, 795-820.
9.
de LeonL. L. F. (2013). The Tuesday advantage of politicians endorsed by American newspapers. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13, 865-886.
10.
DellaVignaS.KaplanE. (2007). The fox news effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1187-1234.
11.
DugganJ.MartinelliC. (2011). A spatial theory of media slant and voter choice. Review of Economic Studies, 78, 640-666.
12.
EriksonR. S. (1976). The influence of newspaper endorsements in presidential elections: The case of 1964. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 207-233.
13.
Federal Communications Commission. (1961). Survey of political broadcasting. Washington, D.C.
14.
GalvisA. F.SnyderJ. M.Jr.SongB. (2016). Newspaper market structure and behavior: Partisan coverage of political scandals in the united states from 1870 to 1910. Journal of Politics, 78, 368-381.
15.
GentzkowM. (2006). Television and voter turnout. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 931-972.
16.
GentzkowM.GlaeserE. L.GoldinC. (2006). The rise of the fourth estate: How newspapers became informative and why it mattered. In GlaeserE. L.GoldinC. (Eds.), Corruption and reform: Lessons from Americas economic history (pp. 187-230). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
17.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78, 35-71.
18.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1799-1839.
19.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M.SinkinsonM. (2011). The effect of newspaper entry and exit on electoral politics. American Economic Review, 101, 2980-3018.
20.
GroelingT. (2008). Who’s the fairest of them all? An empirical test for partisan bias on ABC, CBS, NBC, and fox news. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 38, 631-657.
21.
GrosecloseT.MilyoJ. (2005). A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1191-1237.
22.
HazlettT. W.SosaD. W. (1997). Was the fairness doctrine a “chilling effect”? Evidence from the postderegulation radio market. Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 279-301.
23.
HindmanD. B.WiegandK. (2008). The big three’s prime-time decline: A technological and social context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 119-135.
24.
HoD. E.QuinnK. M. (2008). Measuring explicit political positions of media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 353-377.
25.
LaddJ.LenzG. S. (2009). Exploiting a rare communication shift to document the persuasive power of the news media. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 394-410.
26.
LarcineseV.PuglisiR.SnyderJ. M.Jr. (2011). Partisan bias in economic news: Evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1178-1189.
27.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1948). The people’s choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
28.
MullainathanS.ShleiferA. (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95, 1031-1053.
29.
PetrovaM. (2011). Newspapers and parties: How advertising revenues created an independent press. American Political Science Review, 105, 790-808.
30.
PogorelskiyK.ShumM. (2018). News we like to share: How news sharing on social networks influences voting outcomes. SSRN Working Paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2972231.
31.
PratA.StrömbergD. (2013). The political economy of mass media. In AcemogluD.ArellanoM.DekelE. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometric: Tenth World Congress Volume II, Applied Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
PuglisiR.SnyderJ. M.Jr. (2011). Newspaper coverage of political scandals. Journal of Politics, 73, 931-950.
34.
SunsteinC. R. (2018). # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Van AelstP.StrömbackJ.AalbergT.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.. . . StanyerJ. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 3-27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
