Several scholars investigate the link between news media and political attitudes of citizens, showing that media exposure affects confidence in political institutions. Beginning from this perspective, we analyze trust in government in twenty-seven European countries, testing the interactive relationship between citizens’ policy views and media slant. Under the assumption that news media bias content in the direction of their audiences or are compliant with potential influence exerted by the government, we use Eurobarometer survey data to measure the effects of the ideological slant of newspapers and public television on trust in government. Our results show that the pro- or antigovernment slant of media outlets interacts with the individual ideological views of each citizen and confirm that media act like “echo-chambers” that reinforce preexisting attitudes. Conversely, the consumption of counter-attitudinal information barely alters trust in government nor does it produce hostile media effects. We also find a slight difference between newspaper readers and public service broadcaster (PSB) users, which seems related to mechanisms of cognitive dissonance.
AartsKeesFladmoeAudunStrombackJesper. 2012. “Media, Political Trust, and Political Knowledge: A Comparative Perspective.” In How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach, ed. AalbergTorilCurranJames, 98–118. New York: Routledge.
2.
AartsKeesSemetkoHolli A.2003. “The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement.” Journal of Politics65:759–84.
3.
ArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartinMurphyChad. 2012. “Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure.” Journal of Politics74 (1): 174–86.
4.
ArmingeonKlausGuthmannKai. 2014. “Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007–2011.” European Journal of Political Research53:423–42.
5.
AveryJames M.2009. “Videomalaise or Virtuous Circle? The Influence of the News Media on Political Trust.” The International Journal of Press/Politics14 (4): 410–33.
6.
BaronDavid P.2006. “Persistent Media Bias.” Journal of Public Economics90 (1–2): 1–36.
7.
BenklerYochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks. New Haven: Yale University Press.
8.
BenoitKennethLaverMichael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
9.
BerryWilliam D.GolderMattMiltonDaniel. 2012. “Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction.” Journal of Politics74 (3): 653–71.
10.
BesleyTimPratAndrea. 2006. “Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability.” American Economic Review96 (3): 720–36.
11.
BryantJenningsMironDorina. 2004. “Theory and Research in Mass Communication.” Journal of Communication54:662–704.
12.
CappellaJoseph N.JamiesonKathleen Hall. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
CeronAndreaMemoliVincenzo. 2015. “Flames and debates: do social media affect satisfaction with democracy?” Social Indicators Research. Published electronicallyFebruary8. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0893-x.
14.
ChanleyVirginia A.RudolphThomas J.RahnWendy M.2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly64 (3): 239–56.
15.
CitrinJackLuksSamantha. 2001. “Political Trust Revisited: Déjà Vu All over Again?” In What Is It about Government That Americans Dislike? ed. HibbingJohn R.Theiss-MorseElizabeth, 9–27. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CookTimothy E.GronkePaul. 2005. “The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions.” Journal of Politics67 (3): 784–803.
17.
CurranJamesCoenSharonSorokaStuartAalbergTorilHayashiKaoriHichyZiraIyengarShantoJonesPaulMazzoleniGianpietroPapathanassopoulosStylianosRheeJune WoongRojasHernandoRoweDavidTiffenRod. 2014. “Reconsidering ‘Virtuous Circle’ and ‘Media Malaise’ Theories of the Media: An 11-Nation Study.” Journalism15 (7): 815–33.
DjankovSimeonMcLieshCarleeNenovaTatianaShleiferAndrei. 2003. “Who Owns the Media?”Journal of Law & Economics46 (2): 341–81.
20.
DuranteRubenKnightBrian. 2012. “Partisan Control, Media Bias and Viewer Responses: Evidence from Berlusconi’s Italy.” Journal of the European Economic Association10 (3): 451–81.
21.
FestingerLeon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.
22.
FestingerLeonCarlsmithJames M.1959. “Cognitive Consequence of Forced Compliance.” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology68:359–66.
23.
GarrettKelly R.2009. “Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate.” Journal of Communication59:676–99.
24.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2006. “Media Bias and Reputation.” Journal of Political Economy114:280–316.
25.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica78 (1): 35–71.
26.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics126 (4): 1799–839.
27.
GheorghiuMirona A.VignolesVivian L.SmithPeter B.2009. “Beyond the United States and Japan: Testing Yamagishi’s Emancipation Theory of Trust across 31 Nations.” Social Psychology Quarterly72 (4): 365–83.
28.
GrosecloseTimMilyoJeffrey. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Economics120 (4): 1191–237.
29.
HanitzschThomasBerganzaRosa. 2012. “Explaining Journalists’ Trust in Public Institutions across 20 Countries: Media Freedom, Corruption, and Ownership Matter Most.” Journal of Communication62:794–814.
30.
HanrettyChris. 2010. “Explaining the De Facto Independence of Public Broadcasters.” British Journal of Political Science40 (1): 75–89.
31.
HetheringtonMarc J.1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review92:791–808.
32.
HornseyMatthew J.OppesTinaSvenssonAlicia. 2002. “‘It’s OK If We Say It, but You Can’t’: Responses to Intergroup and Intragroup Criticism.” European Journal of Social Psychology32:293–307.
33.
InglehartRonald. 1999. “Postmodernization Erodes Respect for Authority, but Increases Support for Democracy.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. NorrisPippa, 236–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
IyengarShantoHahnKyu S.2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication59:19–39.
35.
JamiesonKathleen HallCappellaJoseph N.2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
KeeleLuke J.2005. “The Authorities Really Do Matter: Party Control and Trust in Government.” Journal of Politics67:445–56.
37.
KlingemannHans-DieterFuchsDieter, eds. 1995. Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Knobloch-WesterwickSilviaMengJingbo. 2009. “Looking the Other Way: Selective Exposure to Attitude-Consistent and Counter-Attitudinal Political Information.” Communication Research36 (3): 426–48.
39.
LevenduskyMatthew S.2013a. “Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes toward the Opposition.” Political Communication30 (4): 565-81.
40.
LevenduskyMatthew S.2013b. “Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers?”American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 611–23.
41.
MairPeter. 2006. Polity Scepticism, Party Failings, and the Challenge to European Democracy. Wassenaar, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study.
42.
MoyPatriciaPfauMichael. 2000. With Malice toward All: The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions. New York: Praeger.
43.
MoyPatriciaPfauMichaelKahlorLeeAnn. 1999. “Media Use and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media43 (2): 137–58.
44.
MullainathanSendhilShleiferAndrei. 2005. “The Market for News.” American Economic Review95 (4): 1031–53.
45.
MutzDiana C.ReevesByron. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review99:1–15.
46.
NorrisPippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PopescuMarinaGosselinTaniaPereiraJose Santana. 2010. “European Media Systems Survey 2010.” Data Set, Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. www.mediasystemsineurope.org.
48.
PriorMarkus. 2013. “Media and Political Polarization.” Annual Review of Political Science16:101–27.
49.
PuglisiRiccardo. 2011. “Being the New York Times: The Political Behaviour of a Newspaper.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy11 (1): 20.
50.
PuglisiRiccardoSnyderJames M.Jr.2014. “The Balanced U.S. Press.” Journal of the European Economic Association. Published electronically August6. doi:10.1111/jeea.12101
51.
RedlawskDavid P.CivettiniAndrew J. W.EmmersonKaren M.2010. “The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever ‘Get It?’”Political Psychology31 (4): 563–93.
52.
SobbrioFrancesco. 2011. “Indirect Lobbying and Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science6 (3–4): 235–74.
53.
SobbrioFrancesco. 2012. “A Citizen-Editors Model of News Media.” Working Paper RSCAS 2012/61, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
54.
StroudNatalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication60:556–76.
55.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.
56.
TsfatiYarivStroudNatalie JominiChotinerAdi. 2014. “Exposure to Ideological News and Perceived Opinion Climate: Testing the Media Effects Component of Spiral-of-Silence in a Fragmented Media Landscape.” The International Journal of Press/Politics19 (1): 3–23.
57.
TworzeckiHubertSemetkoHolli A.2012. “Media Use and Political Engagement in Three New Democracies: Malaise versus Mobilization in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland.” The International Journal of Press/Politics17 (4): 407–32.
58.
ValentinoNicholas A.BeckmannMatthew N.BuhrThomas A.2001. “A Spiral of Cynicism for Some.” Political Communication18:347–67.
59.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
