How does the extension of party conflict to a foreign policy issue affect the ability of Americans to form an opinion about the issue? We test this using elite references and longitudinal public opinion data about the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, a salient foreign policy issue in the United States that is increasingly characterized by partisan divisions. Our findings demonstrate that since the turn of the 21st century, the availability and clarity of party cues have increased, as well as the share of Americans who hold an opinion about the issue. Applying regression models to individual-level data, we reveal that the extension of party conflict to this issue has made it easier for more Americans to form an opinion.
AbramowitzA. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AlthausS. (1996). Opinion polls, information effects, and political equality: Exploring ideological biases in collective opinion. Political Communication, 13, 3-21.
3.
AtkesonL. R.RapoportR. B. (2003). The more things change the more they stay the same: Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952-2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 495-521.
4.
BaumM. A.GroelingT. (2009). Shot by the messenger: Partisan cues and public opinion regarding national security and war. Political Behavior, 31, 157-186.
5.
BaumM. A.PotterP. B. K. (2008). The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 39-65.
6.
BeinartP. (2008). When politics no longer stops at the water’s edge: Partisan polarization and foreign policy. In NivolaP. S.BradyD. W. (Eds.), Red and Blue Nation? (Vol. 2, pp. 151-184). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BerinskyA. J. (2004). Silent voices: Opinion polls and political participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BerinskyA. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.Lomax CookF. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36, 235-262.
10.
BoudreauC.MacKenzieS. A. (2014). Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 48-62.
11.
BullockJ. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105, 496-515.
12.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
CampbellJ. E. (2016). Polarized: Making sense of a divided America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
CavariA. (2012). Six decades of public affection: Trends in American public attitudes toward Israel. In FreedmanR. O. (Ed.), Israel and the United States: Six decades of US-Israeli relations (pp. 100-123). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
CavariA. (2013). Religious beliefs, elite polarization, and public opinion on foreign policy: The partisan gap in American public opinion toward Israel. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 1-22.
16.
CavariA. (2017). The party politics of presidential rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CavariA.FreedmanG. (2017). From bipartisan agreement to electoral contest: Israel in US elections. In CavariA.PowellRichard J.MayerK. R. (Eds.), The 2016 presidential election (pp. 77-96). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
18.
CavariA.NyerE. (2014). From bipartisanship to dysergia: Trends in congressional actions toward Israel. Israel Studies, 19(3), 1-28.
19.
CavariA.YarchiM.PindyckS. (2017). Foreign news on US media: A longitudinal analysis of news coverage of Israel. Israel Studies, 22(1), 24-49.
20.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
21.
CohenG. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822.
22.
ConverseJ. M. (1976). Predicting no-opinion in the polls. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 515-530.
23.
DardisF. E. (2006). Marginalization devices in U.S. press coverage of Iraq war protest: A content analysis. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 117-135.
24.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 57-79.
26.
EpsteinL.SegalJ. A. (2000). Measuring issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 66-83.
27.
FeuerwergerM. C. (1979). Congress and Israel: Foreign aid decision-making in the house of representatives, 1969-1976. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
28.
GarnhamD. (1977). Factors influencing congressional support for Israel during the 93rd congress. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 2, 23-45.
29.
GilboaE. (1987). American public opinion toward Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
30.
GuisingerA.SaundersE. N. (2017). Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: How elites shape mass opinion across international issues. International Studies Quarterly, 61, 425-441.
31.
HeerweghD.LoosveldtG. (2008). Face-to-face versus web surveying in a high-internet-coverage population: Differences in response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 836-846.
32.
HolbrookA. L.GreenM. C.KrosnickJ. A. (2003). Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: Comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 79-125.
33.
HolstiO. R. (2004). Public opinion and American foreign policy (Rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
34.
HolstiO. R. (2011). American public opinion on the Iraq war. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
35.
JamesG.WittenD.HastieT.TibshiraniR. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning (Vol. 112). New York, NY: Springer.
36.
JeongG.-Ho.QuirkP. J. (2017). Division at the water’s edge: The polarization of foreign policy. American Politics Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1532673X17719721.
37.
JohnsR. (2009). Tracing foreign policy decisions: A study of citizens’ use of heuristics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11, 574-592.
38.
KleinbergK. B.FordhamB. O. (2017). Don’t know much about foreign policy: Assessing the impact of “don’t know” and “no opinion” Responses on inferences about foreign policy attitudes. Foreign Policy Analysis, 14(3), 429-448. doi:10.1093/fpa/orw060
39.
KohaviR. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In international joint conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 1137-1145), Montreal, Canada: IJCAI Organization.
40.
KrosnickJ. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213-236.
41.
KrosnickJ. A. (2001). Experiments for evaluating survey questions. In MadansJ.MillerK.MaitlandA.WillisG. (Eds.), Question evaluation methods (pp. 215-238). New York, NY: Wiley.
42.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43.
LawrenceF. F. (1989). Latent class analysis of survey questions that include don’t know responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 525-547.
44.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M. (2002). Party polarization and party structuring of policy attitudes. Political Behavior, 24, 199-236.
45.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.HorowitzJ. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83-110.
46.
LenzG. S. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 821-837.
47.
LevenduskyM. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111-131.
48.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LuskinR. C.BullockJ. G. (2011). “Don’t know” means “don’t know”: DK responses and the public’s level of political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 73, 547-557.
50.
MayerJ. D. (2004). Christian fundamentalists and public opinion toward the Middle East: Israel’s new best friends?Social Science Quarterly, 85, 695-712.
51.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
52.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
53.
MondakJ. J. (1993). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior, 15, 167-192.
54.
MondakJ. J. (2001). Developing valid knowledge scales. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 224-238.
55.
MutzD. C. (2006). How the mass media divide us. In NivolaP. S.BradyD. W. (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics (pp. 223-248). Stanford CA: Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, Stanford University.
56.
NicholsonS. P. (2012). Polarizing cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 52-66.
57.
OldmixonE. A.RosensonB.WaldK. D. (2005). Conflict over Israel: The role of religion, race, party and ideology in the U.S. house of representatives, 1997–2002. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17, 407-426.
58.
PageB. I.BoutonM. M. (2006). The foreign policy dis*connect: What Americans want from our leaders but don’t get. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
59.
PetersenM. B.SkovM.SerritzlewS.RamseyT. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35, 831-854.
RahnW. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 472-496.
64.
RynholdJ. (2015). The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in American political culture. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
SaundersE. (2015). War and the inner circle: Democratic Elite and the politics of using force. Security Studies, 24, 466-501.
66.
SchumanH.PresserS. (1980). Public opinion and public ignorance: The fine line between attitudes and non-attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1214-1225.
67.
StoneM. (1977). Asymptotics for and against cross-validation. Biometrika, 64, 29-35.
68.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
69.
TragerR. A.VavreckL. (2011). The political cost of crisis bargaining: Presidential rhetoric and the role of party. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 526-545.
70.
TriceR. H. (1977). Congress and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Support for Israel in the U.S. Senate, 1970-1973. Political Science Quarterly, 92, 443-463.
71.
WattenbergM. P. (1998). The decline of American political parties 1952-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
