Public opinion can permit or encourage retaliatory aggressive state policies against vulnerable but threatening out-groups. The authors present a model in which public support for such policies is determined by perceived threat from and dehumanization of the target group. This two-factor model predicts Israeli Jews' support for two retaliatory aggressive policies: the more hypothetical notion of Palestinian population transfer and concrete, coercive actions toward Palestinians. The authors find (1) that threat and dehumanization are distinct constructs, each having unique contributions to explaining support for aggressive retaliatory policies, (2) that threat and dehumanization significantly explain support for aggressive retaliatory policies when respondents' hawkishness, socioeconomic status (SES), and education level are taken into account, and (3) that the association of hawkishness and SES with support for aggressive retaliatory policies is largely mediated by threat perception. Results are highly consistent across two studies, suggesting the two-factor model may be useful for understanding support for aggressive action in situations of asymmetric conflict.
Arian, A.1989. A people apart: Coping with national security in problems in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution34 (4): 605-31.
3.
Arian, A.1996. Israeli security opinion, February 1996. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
4.
Arian, A.1998. Israeli public opinion on national security 1998. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
5.
Arian, A.2001. Israeli public opinion on national security 2001. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
6.
Arian, A.2003. Israeli public opinion on national security 2003. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
7.
Bar-On, D.1998. The Israeli society between the culture of death and the culture of life. Israel Studies2 (2): 88-112.
8.
Bar-On, D. forthcoming. The ``other'' within us: Changes in the Israeli identity from a psychosocial perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bar-On, D., and F. Kassem.2004. Storytelling as a way to work-through intractable conflicts: The TRT German-Jewish experience and its relevance to the Palestinian—Israeli context. Journal of Social Issues60 (2): 289-306.
10.
Baron, R., and D. Kenny.1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173-82.
11.
Bar-Tal, D.2000. Shared beliefs in society: Social psychological analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Bar-Tal, D.2001. Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society?Political Psychology22:601-27.
13.
Bar-Tal, D., A. Raviv, and T. Freund.1994. An anatomy of political beliefs: A study of their centrality, confidence contents and epistemic authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology24:849-72.
14.
Bar-Tal, D., and Y. Tiechman.2005. Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli-Jewish society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Chirot, D., and C. McCauley.2006. Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Cohrs, C., S. Kielman, J. Maes, and B. Moschner.2005. Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy5 (1): 263-76.
17.
Coleman, P.2003. Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Toward the development of a meta-framework-I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology9:1-37.
18.
Eidelson, R.J., and J.I. Eidelson.2003. Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist58:182-92.
19.
Fiske, S., A. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu.2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82:878-902.
20.
Friedman, G.2005. Commercial pacifism and protracted conflict: Models from the Palestinian-Israeli case. Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (3): 360-82.
21.
Gibson, J.1992. The political consequences of intolerance: Cultural conformity and political freedom. American Political Science Review86:338-56.
22.
Gordon, C., and A. Arian.2001. Threat and decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution45:196-215.
23.
Haslam, N.2006. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychological Review10 (3): 252-64.
24.
Hello, E., P. Scheepers, and P. Sleegers.2006. Why the more educated are less inclined to keep ethnic distance: An empirical test of four explanations. Ethnic and Racial Studies29 (5): 959-85.
25.
Hermann, R., P. Tetlock, and P. Visser.1999. Mass public decisions to go to war: A cognitiveinteractionist framework. American Political Science Review93 (3): 553-73.
26.
Huddy, L., S. Feldman, C. Taber, and G. Lahav.2005. Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science49:593-608.
27.
Huddy, L., N. Khatib, and T. Capelos.2002. The polls-trends: Reactions to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Public Opinion Quarterly66 (3): 418-50.
28.
Jervis, R.1976. Perception and misperception in international politics . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Kelman, H.1976. Violence without restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victim and victimizers. In Varieties of psychohistory, ed. G. M. Kren and L. H. Rappoport, 282-314. New York: Springer .
30.
Kelman, H.2005. The policy context of torture: A social-psychological analysis. International Review of the Red Cross87:123-34.
31.
Kline, R.2005. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling . New York: Guilford.
32.
Maoz, I.2006. Jewish-Israeli attitudes in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict [in Hebrew].
33.
Maoz, I., and R. Eidelson.2007. Psychological bases of extreme policy preferences: How the personal beliefs of Israeli-Jews predict their support for population transfer in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. American Behavior Scientist11:1476-97.
34.
Maoz, I., and R. McCauley.2005. Psychological correlates of support for compromise: A polling study of Jewish-Israeli attitudes towards solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology26:791-807
35.
Marcus, G., J. Sullivan, E. Theiss-Morse, and S. Wood.1995. With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
McFarland, S., and M. Mathews.2005. Who cares about human rights?Political Psychology26 (3): 365-85.
37.
Morris, B.1999. Righteous victims: A history of the Zionist-Arab conflict 1881-2001. New York: Random House .
38.
Nachtway, J., and M. Tessler.2002. The political economy of attitudes towards peace among Palestinians and Israelis. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (2): 260-85.
39.
Opotow, S.1990. Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues46:1-20.
40.
Poe, S., N. Rost, and S. Carey.2006. Assessing risk and opportunity in conflict studies: A human rights analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (40): 484-507.
41.
Preacher, K., and A. Hayes.2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers36 (4): 717-31.
42.
Rozin, P., L. Lowery, S. Imada, and J. Hadit.1999. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, and disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, and divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76:574-86.
43.
Salomon, G.2004. Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology10 (3): 257-74.
44.
Shamir, M., and T. Sagiv-Schifter .2006. Conflict, identity, and tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa intifada. Political Psychology27 (4): 569-95.
45.
Shamir, J., and M. Shamir.2000. The anatomy of public opinion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
Shapira, A.1992. Land and power: The Zionist resort to force 1881-1948 . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Skitka, L., C. Bauman, and E. Mullen.2004. Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11 2001 terrorist attacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30:743-56.
48.
Staub, E.1989. The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Staub, E.1990. Moral exclusion, personal goal theory, and extreme destructiveness . Journal of Social Issues46:47-64.
50.
Staub, E.2000. Genocide and mass killings: Origins, prevention, healing, and reconciliation. Political Psychology21:367-82.
51.
United Nations.2002. Human rights—A compilation of international instruments. New York: United Nations.
52.
Waltz, K.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
Yuchtman-Yaar, E., and T. Herman.1997. The Peace Index Project: Findings and analyses, June 1996-May 1997 [in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University, Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research .
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
